Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Что понравилось в картинке

Channel

Что понравилось в картинке

@ponravu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,784subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090456563
TypeChannel
Username@ponravu
Created31 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ponravu

Growth

4,7834,7964,789.56 August 2026 — 4,795 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,795 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,796 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,792 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,789 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,784 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,783 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,784 subscribers4,7846 August 202624 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,781–4,798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 15:484,784+1
21 Aug 2026, 09:244,783-1
18 Aug 2026, 18:034,784-5
15 Aug 2026, 12:124,789-3
11 Aug 2026, 22:164,792-4
8 Aug 2026, 23:584,796+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:504,795no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:374,795first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,167 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
47941.0%
🔥25822.1%
👍25621.9%
🤨423.60%
🤣363.08%
🤔272.31%
🥴181.54%
👀121.03%
😁70.6%
🥰70.6%
🍌40.343%
🎃40.343%
😍40.343%
❤‍🔥30.257%
👎30.257%
🤮20.171%
10.086%
🏆10.086%
👌10.086%
💋10.086%
1 further kind10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2022 to 12 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ponravu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 April 2022 to 12 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2025, 11:34 UTC≈7,440 views56 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Уродливая герцогиня Сатирический собирательный портрет работы Квентина Массейса (Quinten Massijs). Есть отсылки к Маргарите Тирольской, но это не точно. Нравится, что груди напоминают больше ткань, чем кожу. А пальцы правой руки перепутаны так, что кажется, будто их шесть. Ну, и в целом, гениальная работа.

🤣19🔥129🥴6🎃4😁3👀2🏆1

9 Jun 2025, 12:36 UTC≈10,800 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Теория «просачивания» (trickle-down theory) — это экономическая концепция, согласно которой выгоды, предоставленные богатым (например, снижение налогов или дерегулирование), со временем «просочатся» к остальной части населения за счет создания рабочих мест, инвестиций и экономического роста. Данное изображение визуально критикует эту теорию, подразумевая, что богатство верхнего класса на самом деле не доходит до бед

56🥴11👀7🔥5😁4

23 May 2025, 08:13 UTC≈8,930 views109 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Классная находка, аж хочется прочесть

86🔥22👀1

8 Apr 2025, 18:00 UTC≈9,800 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Классно решен трафарет в литере «А». Напоминает молнию или разряд тока.

🤨42🤔25🤣15👍74🍌4

8 Apr 2025, 10:12 UTC≈8,230 views136 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Бесконечно крутое умение работать с планами, выбирать точку съемки и соотношения элементов. Нравится, как мелкие фигуры людей добавляют игрушечности самому шаттлу. Забавно, что горизонт полей приходится на срез рукавов, что добавляет поинтов находчивости фотографа. Автор — Joel Sternfeld

104👍23🥰3😍3👀2💋1

7 Oct 2024, 11:43 UTC≈12,100 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не забудьте посмотреть его инсту, там всегда много свежих классностей https://www.instagram.com/job_wouters

20👍7🔥6

7 Oct 2024, 11:41 UTC≈10,300 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Один из любимых каллиграфов — Letman. Впервые я познакомился с ним лично в 2014 году, а потом случайно еще раз пересекся в Амстердаме. Нравится, что у него относительно свободный стиль, очень узнаваемый, даже в паттерновой росписи. Отдельно понравились флюрограммные рыбы. https://bigactive.com/artists/letman/

🔥2811👍4

9 Aug 2024, 07:08 UTC≈11,000 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Извилистая дорога, Эстак» (Андре Дерен) The Turning Road, L´Estaque (André Derain) Фактически, картина стала последней в коротком направлении фовизма. Нравится выразительность цветов. Не смотря на преувеличенный антиреализм цветовых сочетаний, остается ощущение, что я видел подобные гаммы в жизни, когда свет преломляется странным образом. Вообще приемы фовизма часто используются в графическом дизайне. Например, ли

48🔥14👍2👌1

9 Jul 2024, 08:47 UTC≈11,200 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Непривычный Кандинский В Амстердаме сейчас проходит выставка Кандинского. Очень интересно посмотреть, как художник прошел путь к тому, каким мы его привыкли видеть. Особо понравились работы, вдохновленные экспрессионизмом.

🔥50👍1815

13 Dec 2022, 12:01 UTC≈27,200 views149 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Українська ніч. Побачення (1905). Николай Пимоненко. Это освещение настолько крутое, что зритель становится частью картины. Вот этот жесткий лунный свет можно иногда застать, и наблюдать, какой он графичный. Я вспоминаю, что застал его несколько раз в жизни. Еще бросается в глаза венок, который выглядит очень детализированным. Взор интересно перемещается через фигуры с яркой точки платья к яркой точке стены дома.

109👍30🥰4❤‍🔥3🤮2😍1

20 Nov 2022, 08:57 UTC≈22,200 views70 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обложка Funeral Diner — The Underdark. Автор хорошо чувствует композицию и светотень. Обратите внимание, что уход толпы влево добавляет какой-то обреченности: это больше изгнание прокаженных, чем собрание друидов на праздник. И на фоне вообще мрак и безысходность. Создается ощущение, что на часть монахов из толпы посветили спотлайтом. И именно они обернули лица на две фигуры. Намек на какую-то последнюю надежду не

👍606🤣2🤩1🥴1

9 Aug 2022, 06:01 UTC≈20,500 views125 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Моя любимая обложка — Judas Priest «British Steel», 1980. Гениально подобранный свет, который в темных местах скрывает соприкосновение пальцев с лезвием. Длинные тени как бы являются продолжением пальцев, и зритель сам дорисовывает картинку врезающихся в лезвие фаланг. Вот это ощущение «чуть-чуть» и запоминается. А потом еще начинаешь представлять лезвие таких размеров в реальности. Для чего его б можно было исполь

👍73🔥3811🤔21

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ponravu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,598,121 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Что понравилось в картинке” (@ponravu), 4,784 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ponravu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.