19 measurements spanning 20 days, net -175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,051–24,278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 06:18
24,077
-1
26 Aug 2026, 03:43
24,078
-1
25 Aug 2026, 06:33
24,079
-22
24 Aug 2026, 03:15
24,101
-19
22 Aug 2026, 09:15
24,120
-26
21 Aug 2026, 01:03
24,146
-9
19 Aug 2026, 22:38
24,155
-10
18 Aug 2026, 23:42
24,165
-21
17 Aug 2026, 22:45
24,186
+1
16 Aug 2026, 22:15
24,185
-17
15 Aug 2026, 14:56
24,202
-11
14 Aug 2026, 02:18
24,213
+4
12 Aug 2026, 22:17
24,209
-11
11 Aug 2026, 21:08
24,220
+4
10 Aug 2026, 23:02
24,216
-11
9 Aug 2026, 20:51
24,227
-5
8 Aug 2026, 18:27
24,232
-20
7 Aug 2026, 14:30
24,252
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:21
24,252
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.58%
avg views ÷ 24,077 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held
27 (19 June 2026 – 25 August 2026)
Views total
11,035
Reactions total
312
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
743 reactions across 27 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
325
43.7%
🔥
158
21.3%
🥰
147
19.8%
👍
40
5.38%
👏
32
4.31%
❤🔥
7
0.942%
💯
7
0.942%
🤔
7
0.942%
🆒
3
0.404%
👌
3
0.404%
🤩
3
0.404%
💋
2
0.269%
😍
2
0.269%
😘
2
0.269%
⚡
1
0.135%
✍
1
0.135%
🙉
1
0.135%
🤗
1
0.135%
🤝
1
0.135%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 743reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔄 BIG UPDATE IS LIVE
We’ve just rolled out several important improvements to Polynetica:
💬Updated Notify Bot
Smarter and more useful notifications
🔴User Errors
All common user errors are now displayed and explained
💬Online Support
Get help directly when you need it
More improvements. Smoother experience. More to come.
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE
🔥 WEEKLY REWARD IN POLYNETICA
POLLY is distributed every Monday and the next payout is coming soon.
🕤 Distribution time: 16:00 UTC
🔎 Tokens distributed: POLLY
Join us and earn rewards with us every week!
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE
🔎 Two ways to grow with Polynetica
Choose between two Social Mining Programs:
➡️ DUO
• Cycle ROI: +200%
• Up to +6,000% monthly
• Faster cycles, teamwork matters
➡️QUATTRO
• Cycle ROI: +300%
• Up to +9,000% monthly
• Can work without personal partners
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE | PITCHDECK
🌐 Keep your Telegram safe
A new type of malware PowerShell can steal Telegram session data from Windows devices and give attackers access to your account - even without your password or SMS code
A few simple rules can help:
• Don’t run unknown scripts
• Download apps only from trusted sources
• Be careful with links and files
• Keep Telegram and Windows updated
• Check Settings → Devices from time to time
• Enable…
🔥 WEEKLY REWARD IN POLYNETICA
$POLLY rewards go out every Monday, and the next one is just around the corner.
🕤 Distribution time: 16:00 UTC
🔎 Tokens distributed: POLLY
Join us and earn rewards with us every week!
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE
🚀 How to Get Started with Polynetica
First, top up your wallet with $POL on the Polygon network. The required amount depends on the package you choose.
Important: keep around 3 extra POL in your wallet to cover network fees. Otherwise, the activation transaction may fail.
To connect your wallet:
1) Go to polynetica.com
2) Click Connect Wallet
3) Choose your wallet, for example MetaMask.
Make sure the Polygon netwo…
🔥 WEEKLY REWARD IN POLYNETICA
Every Monday, $POLLY rewards are distributed to our community and the next payout is just around the corner.
🕤 Distribution time: 16:00 UTC
🔎 Tokens distributed: POLLY
Join us and earn rewards with us every week!
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE
🔥 How much you can earn | Up to 9,000%
At Polynetica, you can use two Social Mining Programs to grow your income: Duo & Quattro.
Your results will depend on your activity and the program you activate. Here are the numbers for both programs:
➡️ DUO | Cycle ROI: +200%
→ Expected Monthly Earnings: +6,000%
→ In DUO, cycles complete faster, but partner collaboration is essential.
➡️ QUATTRO | Cycle ROI: +300%
→ Expect…
🔥 WEEKLY REWARD IN POLYNETICA
POLLY is distributed every Monday and the next payout is coming soon.
🕤 Distribution time: 16:00 UTC
🔎 Tokens distributed: POLLY
Join us and earn rewards with us every week!
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE
Polynetica Social Mining | Introduction + Links 😊
Welcome to Polynetica Social Mining!
WHAT IS IT?
Polynetica Social Mining revolves around two powerful programs: DUO and QUATTRO.
🥸 DUO Program
• Each level has 2 places.
• Total profit per cycle: 200%
🥸 QUATTRO Program
• Each level has 6 places in 2 lines:
• Total profit per cycle: 300%
🔗 PITCH DECK (PDF DOC)
🔗 FULL REGISTRATION TUTORIAL
🔗 POLYNETICA REGISTRATI
🔥 WEEKLY REWARD IN POLYNETICA
$POLLY rewards go out every Monday, and the next one is just around the corner.
🕤 Distribution time: 16:00 UTC
🔎 Tokens distributed: POLLY
Join us and earn rewards with us every week!
🙂 POLYNETICA | GUIDE
💰 Temporary Issues with the Polygon Network
Dear community,
We’re currently experiencing temporary issues caused by the Polygon network itself, not the Polynetics platform. Due to the low POL token price, some validators have reduced node support, affecting network stability.
We’ve already prepared a solution that requires updating how Polynetics interacts with the Polygon network.
The implementation will begin s…
❤15🥰6🔥5🤔3💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @polynetica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 133,543 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Polynetica” (@polynetica), 24,077 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polynetica.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.