Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for те самые плюс сайз подборки

Channel

те самые плюс сайз подборки

@plus_size_curvewb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

58,437subscribers

-1,854 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001880193845
TypeChannel
Username@plus_size_curvewb
Descriptionмаша, шмотки и 3 собаки. WB / OZON / Lamoda / вб 🦦связь @mariagreeeen канал ВК — vk.ru/im/channels/-233346513 канал MAX — max.ru/plus_size_curvewb https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=676f563740af125d6a98ff27&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/plus_size_curvewb

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

58,43760,29559,3667 August 2026 — 60,291 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,295 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,267 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,255 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,277 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,243 subscribers13 August 2026 — 60,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,206 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,180 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,135 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,090 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,077 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,060 subscribers21 August 2026 — 60,043 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,051 subscribers24 August 2026 — 60,006 subscribers25 August 2026 — 59,976 subscribers26 August 2026 — 59,949 subscribers27 August 2026 — 59,773 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,785 subscribers29 August 2026 — 59,675 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,645 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,604 subscribers1 September 2026 — 59,552 subscribers2 September 2026 — 59,538 subscribers4 September 2026 — 59,478 subscribers6 September 2026 — 59,442 subscribers9 September 2026 — 59,329 subscribers12 September 2026 — 59,247 subscribers13 September 2026 — 59,192 subscribers15 September 2026 — 59,123 subscribers17 September 2026 — 59,074 subscribers19 September 2026 — 59,027 subscribers26 September 2026 — 58,839 subscribers4 October 2026 — 58,591 subscribers9 October 2026 — 58,437 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
36 measurements spanning 63 days, net -1,854. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,158–60,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 04:3558,437-154
4 Oct 2026, 17:5958,591-248
26 Sept 2026, 21:2058,839-188
19 Sept 2026, 16:1959,027-47
17 Sept 2026, 06:5759,074-49
15 Sept 2026, 07:4259,123-69
13 Sept 2026, 18:4159,192-55
12 Sept 2026, 03:1859,247-82
9 Sept 2026, 16:5659,329-113
6 Sept 2026, 05:5859,442-36
4 Sept 2026, 02:5759,478-60
2 Sept 2026, 14:3559,538-14
1 Sept 2026, 17:3459,552-52
31 Aug 2026, 15:4459,604-41
30 Aug 2026, 16:0859,645-30
29 Aug 2026, 18:0459,675-110
28 Aug 2026, 14:5459,785+12
27 Aug 2026, 17:3659,773-176
26 Aug 2026, 15:1859,949-27
25 Aug 2026, 18:3959,976first reading

Engagement

286 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.47%
avg views ÷ 58,437 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,530
127 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
127
of 286 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 125 of 127 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held286 (31 July 2026 – 8 October 2026)
Views total702,596
Reactions total13,917
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Oct 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈21,500
Videos
≈92
Links
≈3,560

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 41s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

37,130 reactions across 280 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16,36244.1%
🔥6,57817.7%
❤‍🔥2,8627.71%
😁2,4676.64%
👍1,4213.83%
😍9802.64%
🤣9692.61%
💯9292.50%
💔9032.43%
💘3861.04%
🙈3530.951%
🤯3520.948%
🤝2330.628%
🤔2290.617%
😭2140.576%
🥰2120.571%
🤩2100.566%
👀2070.558%
😱1910.514%
😨1350.364%
25 further kinds9372.52%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 280 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 284 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @plus_size_curvewb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 286 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.35%
1 of 286 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
11,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,370
over 283 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxH1NaP113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Oct 2026, 18:27 UTC≈3,060 views120 reactionsread 9 October 2026

считаю, что видео визуальный отстой, но я договорилась с собой и с вами, что ниче не буду переделывать: лучше хоть как, чем никак

👍65❤39🔥14☃2

8 Oct 2026, 18:24 UTC≈3,180 views183 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Video

эх говорила классуха, что максимова закончит в подъезде… ловите прямое включение из падика, крошки✨✨ ну а что поделать, дома уже не было нужного света. там, впрочем, уже тоже #админ #журнал

❤98🔥40😁27😍5❤‍🔥4🤩4🍾3💘2

8 Oct 2026, 13:31 UTC≈3,700 views66 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤38😍25🤯3

8 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC≈3,510 views260 reactions2 Starsread 9 October 2026

если было полезно, лайк-поддержка, буду очень рада💕✨

❤169🔥49💘29👍9💯2⚡1😍1

8 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTC≈3,490 views165 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

в каждый из образов выше, кстати, можно ещё деталей накидать, и лишними они вообще не будут дофаминовый кодекс позволяет но что если… я не хочу ту мач. хочу простенько, слегка, чтобы детальку убрать и оп, я нормис? тогда не забивайте себе голову и обзаведитесь одной хитровыебанной вещью/деталью, которая будет переворачивать образ с ног на голову. с ней — дофамин, без неё — обычно но эта вещь должна быть настольк…

❤116👍26🔥23

8 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC≈3,310 views124 reactionsread 9 October 2026
Photo

быстренькое саммэри и ✨вдохновение✨ #журнал я хочу выглядеть дофаминово. что беру и проверяю: 1. два акцентных цвета 2. один принт 3. если хочу больше цветов и принтов, беру больше 4. прикидываю, есть ли у меня что-нибудь фактурное: ткань, которая будет выделяться или отличаться хоть как-нибудь 5. есть что-нибудь фигурное или форменное? оборка, волан, рюша, бантик, завязочка, кружево. что-нибудь, что выделяетс…

🔥89❤28😁5❤‍🔥2

8 Oct 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,210 views68 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

возвращаемся к дофамину💅🏻 наорать цветами и принтами на прохожих недостаточно. есть ещё пара деталей, которых нужно добавить: — разные фактуры гладко и плоско не надо, надо шероховато, пушисто, мято, глянцево, пайеточно выбиваться из привычного порядка вещей должны не только текстуры (принты и цвета), но и тактильные ощущения от тканей. образ должно хотеться не только рассмотреть, но и потрогать. контраст фактур,…

❤50🔥18

7 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈3,630 views53 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🤍 и шифоновые блузки в горошек романтичные полупрозрачные с шарфиком такие мне тоже очень нравятся с джинсами, можно нежные образы собрать 🔗ссылка размеры 50-68 — 3398₽

❤50👍3

7 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈3,350 views47 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🖤 блузки с кейпом до 68 размера такие блузочки со вшитым кейпом ещё не видела, мне кажется лайк сочетала бы с джинсами и туфлями, но с костюмными брюками/юбками тоже красиво и на праздник можно 🔗ссылка размеры 50-68 — 3398₽

❤36👍8💘2🤔1

7 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈3,650 views67 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Photo

🤎 подборка юбок 1 🔗ссылка размеры 42-58 — 1274₽ 2 🔗ссылка размеры 46-56 — 2134₽ 3 🔗ссылка размеры 52-62 — 4041₽ 4 🔗ссылка размеры 46-64 — 3992₽ 5 🔗ссылка размеры 42-58 — 2873₽

❤55🤔7🔥3👍2

7 Oct 2026, 09:59 UTC≈4,870 views62 reactionsread 8 October 2026

юбка не то, ща переоденусь и сдам заказала вслепую, тк нечем прикрыть ass буквально — кризис низов

❤52😍8👍2

7 Oct 2026, 09:58 UTC≈4,820 views116 reactionsread 8 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥72❤36🤣5👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @plus_size_curvewb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTCAnonymous Poll550 voters

ну что, носили бы такое?

  1. карди с мехом топ14%
  2. куртки с мехом база25%
  3. шарфы-боа роскошь13%
  4. бахромушки нормик21%
  5. шерлоко-кейпы вау22%
  6. дичь какая чур меня, чур42%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTCAnonymous Poll1,620 voters approx.

читали?

  1. да, интересно30%
  2. смотрю только образы и референсы37%
  3. читаю выборочно29%
  4. а о чем собсна речь?12%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll1,600 voters approx.

гирлз, где покупаем?

  1. сижу на вб72%
  2. выбираю озон51%
  3. ламода родненькая15%
  4. плюссайз магазы6%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“те самые плюс сайз подборки” (@plus_size_curvewb), 58,437 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plus_size_curvewb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.