Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Your Daily Wager

Channel

Your Daily Wager

@play_7bitcasino

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

53,060subscribers

-6,917 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001625512813
TypeChannel
Username@play_7bitcasino
DescriptionJust a little patience, and you'll be rewarded with some great updates!
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/play_7bitcasino

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

53,06059,97756,518.57 August 2026 — 59,977 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,926 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,816 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59,739 subscribers11 August 2026 — 59,668 subscribers12 August 2026 — 59,522 subscribers13 August 2026 — 59,421 subscribers14 August 2026 — 59,308 subscribers16 August 2026 — 59,142 subscribers17 August 2026 — 59,005 subscribers18 August 2026 — 58,899 subscribers19 August 2026 — 58,801 subscribers20 August 2026 — 58,726 subscribers21 August 2026 — 58,641 subscribers22 August 2026 — 58,480 subscribers24 August 2026 — 58,323 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58,226 subscribers26 August 2026 — 58,126 subscribers27 August 2026 — 58,083 subscribers28 August 2026 — 58,014 subscribers29 August 2026 — 57,932 subscribers30 August 2026 — 57,840 subscribers31 August 2026 — 57,714 subscribers1 September 2026 — 57,598 subscribers3 September 2026 — 57,505 subscribers4 September 2026 — 57,424 subscribers6 September 2026 — 57,215 subscribers10 September 2026 — 56,902 subscribers12 September 2026 — 56,721 subscribers14 September 2026 — 56,550 subscribers15 September 2026 — 56,359 subscribers18 September 2026 — 56,204 subscribers30 September 2026 — 55,186 subscribers5 October 2026 — 54,734 subscribers10 October 2026 — 54,346 subscribers13 October 2026 — 54,081 subscribers15 October 2026 — 53,980 subscribers16 October 2026 — 53,887 subscribers17 October 2026 — 53,814 subscribers18 October 2026 — 53,714 subscribers19 October 2026 — 53,626 subscribers20 October 2026 — 53,589 subscribers21 October 2026 — 53,515 subscribers22 October 2026 — 53,404 subscribers23 October 2026 — 53,331 subscribers24 October 2026 — 53,228 subscribers25 October 2026 — 53,129 subscribers26 October 2026 — 53,060 subscribers7 August 202626 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 80 days, net -6,917. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,022–61,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 14:2853,060-69
25 Oct 2026, 17:1053,129-99
24 Oct 2026, 15:4453,228-103
23 Oct 2026, 12:2753,331-73
22 Oct 2026, 14:1853,404-111
21 Oct 2026, 05:3853,515-74
20 Oct 2026, 05:2053,589-37
19 Oct 2026, 07:4553,626-88
18 Oct 2026, 06:5853,714-100
17 Oct 2026, 04:5753,814-73
16 Oct 2026, 03:0653,887-93
15 Oct 2026, 00:5953,980-101
13 Oct 2026, 17:5754,081-265
10 Oct 2026, 04:0154,346-388
5 Oct 2026, 22:5954,734-452
30 Sept 2026, 14:3755,186-1,018
18 Sept 2026, 04:1556,204-155
15 Sept 2026, 23:3856,359-191
14 Sept 2026, 03:3656,550-171
12 Sept 2026, 07:5956,721first reading

Engagement

360 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.427%
avg views ÷ 53,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
227
140 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.515%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
145
of 360 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 39 of 140 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held360 (3 August 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total31,741
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Oct 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,360
Videos
≈72
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 111 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14582.9%
👍169.14%
🔥84.57%
🏆21.14%
🤯21.14%
😎10.571%
🤝10.571%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 360 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 360 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 350 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @play_7bitcasino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 360 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Oct 2026, 17:48 UTC54 viewsread 26 October 2026

😎 And only one smart guy knew the right answer, which is 1️⃣ Casino A — $300 Explanation: Casino A: $20 × 15 = $300 ; Casino B: ($20 deposit + $20 bonus) × 10 = $400. 👉 Casino A requires $100 less wagering. 🎯 RULE TO FOLLOW: Compare the actual wagering amounts—not just the multipliers.

26 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC82 viewsread 26 October 2026
Photo

👉 And now, for your convenience, let's merge 🎃 Top Halloween Casino Promotions and 👻 Best Crypto-Friendly Bonus Deals in one post and pin it for a while 📌 1️⃣ Halloween Casino Promos 🎰 1. BETMGM — UP TO 1,000 BONUS SPINS A Halloween promotion for eligible US players, with promo code BOOKIESCAS. 👉 Check the offer 🎁 2. FANDUEL CASINO — 1,000 BONUS SPINS + $25 BONUS The advertised deal requires a $5 deposit. Availabl…

26 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC56 viewsread 26 October 2026

❗️ For all our crypto-lovers out here! ☝️ We've got an extra list of Halloween bonuses for those who prefer BTC, ETH, or other crypto payments! These Halloween promotions are worth a closer look before they end. 🌍👻s 👻 1. WILD.IO — WILD HALLOWEEN 📅 Runs through November 1, 2026 Daily Trick or Treat rewards: make a qualifying $30 deposit to unlock the daily offer. Ghost Hunt: discover hidden ghosts and find reload …

26 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC69 viewsread 26 October 2026

Good job, and happy Monday! ✅ Correct answer is 1️⃣ - $400 WHY: The bonus is 50% of $100 = $50. Then $50 × 8 = $400. 🎯 RULE TO FOLLOW: Calculate the bonus amount first, then apply the multiplier.

25 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC113 viewsread 26 October 2026

✅ Correct answer: 3️⃣ 500 spins. Nice Job 52%! 🥳 💡 Explanation: $40 × 25 = $1,000 total wagering. $1,000 ÷ $2 per spin = 500 spins. 🎯 RULE TO FOLLOW: Convert the wagering target into spins only after calculating the full requirement.

25 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC123 viewsread 26 October 2026
Photo

Happy Sunday!🙌 A couple of weeks ago, we offered you the most promising Halloween bonus deals.🎃 But time flies, and Halloween is just around the corner! 👻 So, now is the time for us to update our information and offer you the list of the BEST and MOST TRUSTED upcoming Halloween deals. 🎰 1. BETMGM — UP TO 1,000 BONUS SPINS A Halloween promotion for eligible US players, with promo code BOOKIESCAS. 👉 Check the offer …

25 Oct 2026, 06:12 UTC157 viewsread 26 October 2026

✅ Correct answer is 3️⃣ $3,500 💡 Explanation: $700 × 5 = $3,500. 🎯 RULE TO FOLLOW: The stated wagering base matters more than the headline bonus.

Showing the 12 most recent of 360 posts we hold for @play_7bitcasino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2026, 16:47 UTCFinal Results8 voters

A casino advertises: 🎁 “UP TO 500 FREE SPINS!” What does “up to” actually mean?

  1. Every player gets 500 spins13%
  2. You get at least 500 spins13%
  3. 500 spins is the maximum advertised amount, but the actual amount may be lower63%
  4. The spins are automatically credited without any conditions.25%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Sept 2026, 17:31 UTCFinal Results7 voters

💪 Well, mates, the long-awaited Friday night is finally here! 🥳 😎 Considering the subject of the last few posts, we just have to ask you: how do you prefer to top up your balance?🔝

  1. Visa /Mastercard29%
  2. PayPal, Payoneer, etc..43%
  3. Cryptocurrency43%
  4. Cash, baby. Our private speakeasy place accepts only cash. And no refunds14%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Sept 2026, 13:44 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

💡 Almost forgot about traditional “How was your weekend spins” quiz So, how was it?😎

  1. Great50%
  2. Terrible17%
  3. Not great, not terrible33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 07:23 UTCFinal Results6 voters

🚀 Which strategy actually changes the mathematical house edge?

  1. Cashing out at 1.50×0%
  2. Cashing out at 10×17%
  3. Increasing your stake50%
  4. None of the above33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTCFinal Results7 voters

🚀 A Crash game has a 2% house edge. Which theoretical RTP does that correspond to?

  1. 1️⃣ 96%0%
  2. 2️⃣ 97%14%
  3. 3️⃣ 98%71%
  4. 4️⃣ 102%14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 360 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

BitStarz Community
@bitstarzcasino · 49,143
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
MilkyWay Casino
@MilkywayCasinoOfficial · 38,778
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 September 2026
WEISS.Bet
@weissbet_official · 19,729
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 29 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Your Daily Wager” (@play_7bitcasino), 53,060 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/play_7bitcasino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.