Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

plavix.ir

@plavix_ir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,567subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002812989563
TypeChannel
Username@plavix_ir
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/plavix_ir

Growth

1,5231,5671,5456 August 2026 — 1,523 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,523 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,533 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,558 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,516–1,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:121,567+9
9 Aug 2026, 14:161,558+25
6 Aug 2026, 21:051,533+10
6 Aug 2026, 07:351,523no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:341,523first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 1,567 subscribers
Avg views / post
442
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total8,392
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

116 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7161.2%
🔥2723.3%
👍86.90%
😍65.17%
🙏32.59%
👎10.862%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC195 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅🛜 آرشیو ECG پلاویکس 🛜✅ 📣New case 🔜 #Case_52 🔻Case 1 (Digital effects) 🔻Case 2 (SVT with aberrancy) 🔻Case 3 (Inferior RV MI with wencheback) 🔻Case 4 (Infero-posterior RV MI) 🔻Case 5 (LBBB / Heart failure) 🔻Case 6 (STEMI/NSTEMI + Myocardial Inj&PulmED (Plus Follow/Up) 🔻Case 7 (Heart failure) 🔻Case 8 (Heart failure) 🔻Case 9 (Heart failure) 🔻Case 10 (Left main/proximal LAD stenosis or 3VD) 🔻Case 11 (Ischemic C

3🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Case 52 📜آقای ۷۰ ساله Head trauma که دچار سرگیجه سرش و فالینگ شده و سلیقه تعویض دریچه و مصرف وارفارین داره ، توسط EMS با فشار سیستولی 140mmHg به اورژانس آورده شده است . ➖🟰➖🟰➖🟰➖🟰➖🟰➖🟰 ✅تحلیل و تفسیر ✅ Regularity : Regular Rhythm : Atrial Tachycardia Rate : 176bpm P wave : P on T in v1 PR interval : Normal Axis : Normal QRS complex : Normal ST-T : T invert in II , III , aVF QTc : Normal 🔰Summary 🔰 نوارقلب یک Regular Na

4

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC190 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اما نکته آموزنده این کیس چی بود ؟🧐 1⃣اهمیت رخ دادن آریتمی های دهلیزی در بیماران تعویض دریچه بروز آریتمی‌های دهلیزی مثل Af و AFL و AT در بیماران با سابقه تعویض دریچه قلب، علاوه بر یک اختلال ریتم، میتونه نشان‌دهنده تغییرات ساختاری یا همودینامیک مرتبط با دریچه پروتزی باشه و نیازمند ارزیابی دقیق‌تر قلبی هستش . این آریتمی‌ها ممکنه در اثر افزایش فشار دهلیز چپ، اتساع و ریمودلینگ دهلیزی، اختلال عملکرد دریچه مصنوعی، تنگی یا

🔥32

6 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC342 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

فردا یه کیس آریتمی خوب میزارم نکات آموزشی خوبی داره هم توی شرح حال هم توی منیج و انتخاب داروی مناسب 🫀@Plavix_ir

🔥123🙏2

6 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC458 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📰یک مقاله در نوامبر ۲۰۲۲ منتشر شده که مربوط به مجله NEJM هست ، خلاصه ش به این صورته که در بیماران VF مقاوم به درمان (یعنی مریض VF در حال CPR هستش و ۳ بار شوک دادیم درمان نشده) ، یک روش وجود داره که به مقدار قابل ملاحظه ای باعث درمان VF شده و با افزایش بقا و پیامد های نورولوژیک مطلوب همراه بوده . ✅اسم روش اینه ------» Double sequential external defibrilation 📨یعنی چی⁉️ یعنی شما میای از دوتا دستگاه الکتروشوک استفاده

14🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC489 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ترجمه فارسی کتاب های هاریسون 2025

17

5 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC482 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Left-sided 3rd-7th rib fractures with 6th and 8th rib fractures displaced. No pneumothorax or pleural fluid collection. 🔘〰〰〰〰〰〰〰〰🔘 🌀 Telegram : @Plavix_ir

👍4👎1

4 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC592 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅🛜 آرشیو ECG پلاویکس 🛜✅ 📣New case 🔜 #Case_51 🔻Case 1 (Digital effects) 🔻Case 2 (SVT with aberrancy) 🔻Case 3 (Inferior RV MI with wencheback) 🔻Case 4 (Infero-posterior RV MI) 🔻Case 5 (LBBB / Heart failure) 🔻Case 6 (STEMI/NSTEMI + Myocardial Inj&PulmED (Plus Follow/Up) 🔻Case 7 (Heart failure) 🔻Case 8 (Heart failure) 🔻Case 9 (Heart failure) 🔻Case 10 (Left main/proximal LAD stenosis or 3VD) 🔻Case 11 (Ischemic C

3👍3

3 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC611 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر یک Wellens Syndrome دیدم ، چکار کنم ؟؟!!! 🔰اگر توی مرکز بهداشت یا درمانگاه یا بیمارستانی هستی که آنکال قلب و CCU نداره : استت های ACS رو بده و فوراً بیمار رو اعزام کن به مرکز بهتر با آمبولانس (اگر کت لب نزدیکه ، اعزام کن به مرکز دارای کت لب ، اگر نه اعزام کن به بیمارستانی که آنکال قلب داره) 🔰اگر توی بیمارستان کار میکنی که آنکال قلب یا CCU داره ، استت های ACS رو بده و حتما به آنکال قلب اطلاع بده ، میاد تصمیم میگی

10👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @plavix_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,311 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“plavix.ir” (@plavix_ir), 1,567 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plavix_ir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.