Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @pif112 пиши в тг, новый курс

Channel

@pif112 пиши в тг, новый курс

@pifagor_1_chast

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,831subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001542101023
TypeChannel
Username@pifagor_1_chast
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pifagor_1_chast

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8311,8731,85213 August 2026 — 1,873 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,870 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,869 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,866 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,862 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,859 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,856 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,850 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,845 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,842 subscribers22 September 2026 — 1,842 subscribers27 September 2026 — 1,836 subscribers5 October 2026 — 1,833 subscribers12 October 2026 — 1,831 subscribers13 August 202612 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 60 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,825–1,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 12:371,831-2
5 Oct 2026, 16:361,833-3
27 Sept 2026, 22:561,836-6
22 Sept 2026, 23:361,842no change
18 Sept 2026, 01:011,842-3
14 Sept 2026, 00:581,845-5
5 Sept 2026, 02:201,850-6
1 Sept 2026, 12:431,856-3
29 Aug 2026, 12:121,859-3
26 Aug 2026, 09:241,862-4
23 Aug 2026, 10:141,866-3
20 Aug 2026, 07:341,869-1
17 Aug 2026, 17:551,870-3
13 Aug 2026, 12:301,873first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@pif112 пиши в тг, новый курс” (@pifagor_1_chast), 1,831 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pifagor_1_chast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.