Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Пидарков. Слиться

@pidarkov_sliv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,659subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002676613963
TypeChannel
Username@pidarkov_sliv
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 10 May 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pidarkov_sliv

Growth

1,6581,6671,662.57 August 2026 — 1,667 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,658 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,659 subscribers1,6597 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,657–1,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:171,659+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:081,658-8
8 Aug 2026, 08:311,666-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:031,667no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:361,667first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 10 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,491 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣53936.2%
😁38525.8%
👍34723.3%
😭956.37%
🥰523.49%
473.15%
🤡110.738%
❤‍🔥30.201%
🍾20.134%
🐳20.134%
👎20.134%
🙈20.134%
10.067%
😍10.067%
😢10.067%
🤯10.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 13:57 UTC≈4,080 views85 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#админ Кроме Петушкова, ко мне так же пришел самоопускаться Дэвид - та самая "криптоакула", которую бесконечно рекламит Поздняк в основных каналах. Вообще, такое было уже около года назад, однако история не сохранилась - как оказалось, Чуркадэвид всегда после позорного слива бежит и банит все каналы и чаты, чтобы никаких доказательств не осталось, но в этот раз я предусмотрительно всё сохранил, поэтому читайте - @d

😁65🤣113❤‍🔥3🍾2😢1

10 May 2025, 11:27 UTC≈30,300 views290 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#админ Перезалил посты с переписками в петушковым из предыдущего забаненного канала сети сливов приватки. Теперь весь кринж, который он высирает, будет тут - так сказать, мемуары клоуна Кстати, даже этот канал забанили за нарушение АП, хотя тут ни один пост АП не нарушает, вот так вот работает техподдержка в говнограме)

👍185🤣8311🤡7🥰2🤯1😍1

10 May 2025, 11:26 UTC≈29,200 views262 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#админ скрин прислан подписчиком Получается, обоссал …

👍140🥰50😁40🤣1810🤡31

10 May 2025, 11:26 UTC≈26,100 views252 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#админ Владик проснулся утром в своей вонючей Азии (так как его не пускают в Европу) и решил снова навалить кринжа мне в личку. Интересно, когда он поймет, что самоутверждение и попытки кому-то что-то доказать просто так - это синдром нищих из Балаково? У админа с четкостью всё алмазно, и пока Петушков не согласится на нормального гаранта с внесением значительной суммы с обеих сторон, я и пальцем не шевельну, чтобы

😁177🤣58👍104👎2🤡1

10 May 2025, 11:26 UTC≈21,100 views100 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Поздняков походу не хочет дарить 100к админу((

😭955

10 May 2025, 11:26 UTC≈19,400 views124 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Побежал уточнять у шарящих, так ли это... Сам ведь в крипте не разбирается

😁102🤣192👍1

10 May 2025, 11:25 UTC≈18,200 views124 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скоро кошелечек админа пополнится еще на 100к

🤣1202🐳2

10 May 2025, 11:25 UTC≈20,000 views254 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Порвался маленький... Не может принять, что в реальности админ слива богаче его и сидит кайфует, пока Поздняков прячется по разным странам с эскортницами и женой-трансом... Грустно наверное

🤣230👍1110🙈2😁1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pidarkov_sliv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,109,595 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пидарков. Слиться” (@pidarkov_sliv), 1,659 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pidarkov_sliv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.