Channel
@pianzisiquanjia555
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
20,006subscribers
+597 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003692280075 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pianzisiquanjia555 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pianzisiquanjia555 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 20,006 | +597 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 19,409 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (13 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,940 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
188 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 61 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 30.9% | |
| 🖕 | 19 | 10.1% | |
| 👎 | 16 | 8.51% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 7.98% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 3.72% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.13% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.13% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@weiniangcdxianxia 分地区男娘交友聊天群 足控男娘群 @zukongnanniang55 郊狼群 @jiaolangplay XP交流群 @xpcdnanniang 媚黑 @loveneige 吃瓜频道 @xnnchigua 男娘帝国 @xnncdgroup —————————————— @xnnsearch 男娘搜索神器
❤6🔥2🥰2🤮1
Signed tg男娘群防走丢频道（原地区男娘交友频道）
此群永不启用 26.3.25-26.8.10 共计挂图757张，视频三个，846条消息 —————————————————
🤣44🖕19👎16❤15🤮6😁3👍1
草，足控群被pron-iOS了，大家加一下备用群 https://t.me/zukongsesequn
❤6🤯6
———————————————— 当然如果你想聊天吹水，广交好友，可以去 @weiniangcdxianxia 分地区男娘交友聊天群 如果你不喜欢分区群，并且带一点足控xp，那么可以去 @zukongnanniang55 聊天看玉足 如果你喜欢玩郊狼，喜欢电/被电的感觉，可以进 @jiaolangplay 如果你喜欢各种XP，你可以去全XP交流群寻找同好 @xpcdnanniang （此群管理非常少故广告可能较多请谅解，骗子也可能较多） 如果你是媚黑人士，可以去媚黑群聊天（新群刚建，百废待兴，如果有任何提议可以私聊@huahuo55555 ）群组用户名： @loveneige 如果你想吃瓜/有大瓜，可以去吃瓜频道 @xnnchigua 如果你只想去男娘聊天群，可以去男娘帝国群玩哦 @xnncdgroup 如果你喜欢纯男娘聊天群，看各种色图，和男娘交友，可以去 @xnnshenhe —————————————— @…
❤16🤣4😁1
被骗别找我哈！ 被骗别找我哈！ 被骗别找我哈！
🤣9❤4👍3
Signed 云云☁️-重庆
@zsaj521 盗图 p1 骗子账号主页截图。 p2 被盗图原主X发的声明。 p3,p4 26年3月和4月的赞赏截图。在25年10月和11月就已经发出来了。大姐，你会穿越呀？截个图穿越回去翻。 p5-p9 仔细看，每一条动态都是已编辑状态。 综上所述: 个人设置和频道照片应该是随时换的。被发现盗用了谁的照片之后，就马上重新编辑，换上另一套另一个人的照片所以每一条动态都有已编辑字样。正常情况，直接发的是没有已编辑的。
❤7🤣4
骗子公示（地区群分群） pinned a photo
也是“好起来了”。 你云都有高仿号了。 冒充我干中介，介绍。 图1是高仿号，跟我的用户名只相差一个数字 1 。 图2是他介绍的那一个男娘，应该就是他的另一个号。 再次在这里声明。我们所有群的所有管理员也好，群主也好。不给任何人担保。不做中介，不做介绍。 云唯一账号 @CD_xiaoyunyun 多一个标点符号，少一个标点符号都是假的。
❤2
根据直男举报，被害人被骗800多。 其中涉及订金和路费之类的，并且一再要求未见面付尾款。 被骗人说是在分地区北京板块儿被骗的。但是骗子已经删除了所有的聊天记录，并且在群聊里面也没有找到他。 所以这个挂人的记录里面没有电报账号截图。 根据这个支付宝和一些相关信息截图，如果有人知道这个是谁，可以提供相关信息，感谢大家一起抓骗子。
🤯9❤2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @pianzisiquanjia555. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“骗子公示（地区群分群）” (@pianzisiquanjia555), 20,006 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pianzisiquanjia555.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.