Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PENYUAR.uz_byUmida

Channel

PENYUAR.uz_byUmida

@penyuaruz01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,540subscribers

-1,233 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002121881584
TypeChannel
Username@penyuaruz01
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/penyuaruz01

Growth

9,54010,77310,156.57 August 2026 — 10,773 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,755 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,725 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,689 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,618 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,587 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,527 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,469 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,411 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,372 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,342 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,300 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,204 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,130 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,087 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,033 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,961 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,815 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,686 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,540 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 29 days, net -1,233. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,355–10,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 03:419,540-146
1 Sept 2026, 21:359,686-129
30 Aug 2026, 01:589,815-146
27 Aug 2026, 03:249,961-72
26 Aug 2026, 00:2610,033-54
25 Aug 2026, 03:4210,087-43
23 Aug 2026, 22:2410,130-74
22 Aug 2026, 09:1210,204-65
21 Aug 2026, 00:1710,269-31
19 Aug 2026, 23:2710,300-42
18 Aug 2026, 23:3710,342-30
17 Aug 2026, 20:4810,372-39
16 Aug 2026, 19:3710,411-58
15 Aug 2026, 10:4310,469-58
14 Aug 2026, 01:0510,527-60
12 Aug 2026, 20:1310,587-31
11 Aug 2026, 18:1210,618-71
10 Aug 2026, 14:5510,689-36
9 Aug 2026, 12:3210,725-30
8 Aug 2026, 11:3610,755first reading

Engagement

123 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 9,540 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.451%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 123 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 70 of 100 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held123 (1 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total108,473
Reactions total339
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

568 reactions across 84 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30653.9%
👍6210.9%
🔥6010.6%
🥰447.75%
😁213.70%
💘172.99%
142.46%
🕊132.29%
👏101.76%
❤‍🔥81.41%
😎50.88%
🗿30.528%
💯20.352%
10.176%
🦄10.176%
🫡10.176%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 123 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 568 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 123 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC664 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Baza ishlamayapti 7 dan beri Ishlasa ovoz olaman. Ohirida doim shunaqa ishlamiy qoladi bu baza

👏3

28 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC885 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Qizlaa olyapman ovoz Ovozi òtganlarga pul tashab beraman sekin asta @BenUmida

5

28 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 29 August 2026

Ovoz narxi 30 min uji tugaydi open ulgurib qolinglar @BenUmida

28 Aug 2026, 02:52 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 29 August 2026

3 kundan sòng open ham tugaydi,ohirgi kunlari sayt ishlamay muammo qiladi. Yoziyla olyapman hozir.Narxni kòtarilishidan boshqa umid qilmanglar. Gapimga javob boshqa aniq kòtarilmaydi.Sizlardan ovoz olish uchun aytmayapman bu gapni kecha baza ishlamay qolganidan bir ikkita gapla bòldi shu uchun aytyapman,buni hammaga aytib bòlmaydi. Lichkam @BenUmida

28 Aug 2026, 02:41 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 29 August 2026

Assalomu aleykum hammaga ovoz bermoqchi bóganla yozinglar Lichkamga @BenUmida Orada kechagi ovoz berganlarga tólov qilaman

27 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈1,170 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Uxlamagan bòsayla singlimga beriyla ovoz pulini vaqtida tashiydi 30 mingdan Ertaga kuduz kuni yana sayt ishlamiy qolishi mumkin @Bibish0429

2

27 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 29 August 2026

Qizlaa hozir ovozni singlim oladi lichkasi mana. @Bibish0429 Man ovoz berganlaga pul tashayapman.Ertalab olaman.Hozir odam kam payti ham sayt yaxshi ishlayapti bemalol bersangiz bòladi.

27 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,170 views0 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Qizlaa kunduz kuni bugungiday baza ishlamay qolishi mumkin hozir beriyla ovozni @BenUmida

27 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 29 August 2026

Pullarini beryapman hammani havotir olmanglar Ovozi borlar yozinglar @BenUmida

27 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,200 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Bazi odamla shunchalik bòp ketganki 30 ming sòm uchun har xil gaplarni yozishadi. Yana mani bilib,kanalimda bir yildan beri borda òshalar tovba.Qandaydir bot yoki nomeri,ismni bilmaydigan odmalarga berib,aldanib qolsa kòtini qisib jim ketadi,sababi ulani na ismni na nòmerini biladida.😅😂 Kulgim keladi man nòmerim ,ismim hamma adreslarim bilan kanalga qòyganmanda shu orqali òzida bir joylaga yozaman,bir nimala qilama

😁207🗿2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 123 posts we hold for @penyuaruz01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PENYUAR.uz_byUmida” (@penyuaruz01), 9,540 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/penyuaruz01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.