Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 42 days, net +160. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,859–2,070 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 20:18
2,043
-3
5 Oct 2026, 08:19
2,046
+2
26 Sept 2026, 17:40
2,044
+8
17 Sept 2026, 19:55
2,036
+5
13 Sept 2026, 15:00
2,031
+11
10 Sept 2026, 04:39
2,020
+65
4 Sept 2026, 15:22
1,955
+63
1 Sept 2026, 03:18
1,892
+9
31 Aug 2026, 03:45
1,883
no change
31 Aug 2026, 03:35
1,883
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
329 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
160
48.6%
custom 5422622594631243960
49
14.9%
custom 5422365446349294841
42
12.8%
❤🔥
25
7.60%
🔥
19
5.78%
😍
19
5.78%
🎉
12
3.65%
👏
1
0.304%
💯
1
0.304%
🥰
1
0.304%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 329 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По пидорам не горюют. Горюют по людям.
#экзистенциальный_лонгрид
вчера была просто разъёбная сессия с психологиней.
я пришла к ней с тем, что меня мучают мысли. история о том, как несправедливо со мной обошлось руководство школы была ВЕЗДЕ: в моей голове, когда я мою посуду; в моих диалогах внутри головы; в моих страхах; даже читая книгу, я перескакивала мыслями в ситуацию с ТЕМИ людьми и снова крутила по кругу.
м…
про откат
#экзистенциальный_лонгрид
сначала хотела написать просто о событиях жизни, а потом поняла, что все эти события — это единая ткань проживания отката. И постараюсь описать, из чего складывается мой откат.
➡️ Я замедлилась окончательно. На прошлой неделе ощущала себя в потоке бравады и разноса, из разряда «я сейчас пойду, разнесу, создам!!!!» 😤
А эту неделю я себя обнаруживаю где-то в постели, пересматриваю…
ребятааааа, сегодня завершился 5-ый поток «Чему не учат на педфаке». все 27 человек дошли до конца, ходили почти полным составом, реально смотрели записи и делали домашки 😎🔥
и узнала, что сегодня подписали моё заявление на увольнение без 2-недельной отработки. ура!
до конца августа даю себе время просто прийти в себя. абсолютное ничегонеделание.
я вообще в шоке, как открылись возможности. за последние пару дней ко…
Приходите на консультацию по образовательным или блогерским вопросам ❤️❤️
это стратегический созвон, где я буквально говорю что и как делать, отталкиваясь от вас, ваших запросов, ресурсов и желаний
Я могу помочь в 3 аспектах: методика преподавания, образовательный продукт или блогинг.
📌 Прийти можно с любым уровнем
Методика преподавания
— если только начинаешь и нужна база: как ставить цели, выстраивать структуру…
❤28😍18🎉11❤🔥3custom 54226225946312439603
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @pedagoginya_renata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Педагогиня Рената | Чему не учат на педфаке” (@pedagoginya_renata), 2,043 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pedagoginya_renata.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
