Channel
@pcjianghu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
720subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003921707606 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pcjianghu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pcjianghu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 720 | +10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 710 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 710 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (27 July 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,056 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 03:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 61.9% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 33.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最近圈子里人心惶惶，索隆、启航、灰姑娘、聚宝盆、太平洋、汇旺、海外、君赢、姐姐、永盛担保接连爆雷跑路。 不少人曾经对这些担保深信不疑，用了很长一段时间，以为足够稳当，结果说崩就崩。大量用户资金被套，出事之后维权无门，求助无门。接连这么多担保翻车，大伙都陷入迷茫，如今到底还有哪些担保能够真正让人放心？ 眼见一家又一家平台倒下，所有人心里都捏着一把汗，谁也猜不到下一个暴雷跑路的会是谁。谁都不想踩坑，更不想自己辛苦挣来的血汗钱白白打了水漂。 市面上各类担保鱼龙混杂，表面看着光鲜亮丽，背后暗藏重重风险。有踩过坑的、看透门道的朋友，欢迎畅所欲言实话实说，一起扒内幕、避大坑！ ❗️吹水唠瓜、分享亲身踩坑经历直接 @pcjianghu ❗️想进交流群唠嗑、一起预判风险找 @pcgou 🔥分享真实故事即可参与活动，赢猪脚饭福利，最低38.88红包奖励！
❤1
澳门“黑盒子”风波闹得挺大。现场玩家高呼“打开黑盒”，工作人员硬撑着，一直等到保安和司法人员赶到。 当时牌桌一下子围了不少人，玩家情绪激动，不停喊着“打开黑盒子！”一边是围观的人要求打开看看，一边是工作人员拼命维持秩序。 围观的想搞清楚里面到底有什么，但工作人员没马上打开，而是把现场围住，硬是撑到保安和司法人员到场。人一多，围观玩家就被挡在外面，想靠近看看根本不容易。还有人想拍摄，相关拍摄的也被工作人员处理了。 到了关键时刻才发现，过江龙再猛，也终究难敌坐地炮。玩家一盘散沙，输的从来不只是牌局，而是澳门人的团结。
【二狗pc江湖 ｜行业新闻】 顶尖担保，26.4万U也被转走了，还剩0.8U……（感觉是叔叔转走的） 就在刚刚，顶尖担保上押地址转出 264372 U，上押地址还有余额0.8U！ 顶尖这边本来就负责人长期失联、客服停摆、上下押无法正常处理，现在又来一笔大额资金异动，风险等级继续往上拉。 虽然，我说的是虽然链上转账不等于已经跑路。 但失联、业务停摆、资金转出三件套都凑齐了，哪个头铁的还敢上押？ 不过顶尖担保上押才26万u，确实有点……如果是我转账，0.8u都不留，毕竟5块钱也可以吃顿猪脚饭了。 转账详情 点击查看 转出地址：TCpu1AsL4v2WeDaw88EoCQgfMDWdquHqcE 接收地址：TLyfMiC9gT8LBnwLSb1ssFPbiXjknM5RCU
❤3
【二狗PC江湖｜赌友心声】 我十五岁接触PG，三年后才明白：所谓最后一舞，从来不会是最后一次 大家好，我是纵横四海。 我十五岁开始接触PG，到现在已经三年了。 那时候我还在读初二，班里有几个同学经常玩PG。他们一爆奖，就会在教室里炫耀自己赢了多少钱。最开始我觉得这些东西都是骗人的，可他们一直跟我说，钱是真的能提现，也真的可以赚钱。 后来，他们把链接发给了我。 当时的我懵懵懂懂，只想着随便试一试，于是充值了50块钱。他们教我怎么操作，让我打开PG电子，又帮我选了“麻将胡了”。 我用1.2元一枪开始玩，没想到进洞后直接爆了500多块钱。 那一刻，我特别开心。 我马上申请了提现，原本以为钱不可能到账，结果真的收到了。正是这一次成功提现，让我彻底相信，这不是游戏，而是一条所谓的“赚钱捷径”。 后来，我又充值了100块钱，可这次没有爆奖。我以为只是自己运气不好，等了两三天，又充进去200块钱。 那一次，我玩的是四块多…
👍4❤3
【二狗PC江湖｜赌友心声】 我曾一夜从600C打到7000C，也是在那一晚，掉进了最深的陷阱 兄弟们好，我是梨花心。 可能很多人没有听说过我，但应该多少听说过一些关于我的战绩。那些事情听起来确实有点离谱，但都是我真实经历过的。 今天，我决定从头说起。 我记得那是今年二三月份，我第一次接触“飞机”。 当时，我经常在快手上刷到一些作品，说飞机上做业务很赚钱，来钱特别快。那时候的我很天真，真的相信了。 于是，我找人买了一个飞机号，开始研究所谓的业务。 刚接触的时候，我什么都不懂，也不知道还有假担保、假公群这些套路。我当时想得很简单，一个群和频道里有那么多人，对方总不至于为了我这点钱跑路。 我在快手上刷到最多的业务，就是手机口、跑分和洗资。前两种看起来风险太高，我就想先试试小额洗资。 我找了一个看起来比较靠谱的公群。 可没想到，前前后后，我被假担保和假公群骗了两三千块钱。等我真正反应过来的时候，一切都已经晚了。 …
【二狗PC江湖｜赌友心声】 | 白凝冰：初二那年，我尝到了“快钱”的味道】 大家好，我叫白凝冰，今年读初二，接触加拿大PC28已经半年了。 刚开学的时候，我成绩不太好，被分到了差班。晚上宿舍里经常有人偷偷玩手机，有一次还有人在旁边放小电影。我觉得没什么意思，就先睡觉了。 第二天，朋友告诉我，那个看小电影的人还在赌博，几十块钱投进去，最后可能只赢几毛钱。 我当时听完还嘲笑他说： “这不就是傻子吗？有钱不买点东西吃，拿去赌干什么？” 现在回头想想，我当时骂的人，好像就是后来的自己。 第一次接触加拿大PC28，是师兄带着我玩的。刚开始下注不大，只玩了一千多K豆。我觉得这东西好像也没多难，后来还赢了两百多。 尝到甜头以后，我又跑去玩电子。 那次用8块钱爆了200多，我高兴得不得了，感觉赚钱原来可以这么快。可没过多久，我就开始上头，陆陆续续又充了几百块进去，最后全部输光，血本无归。 我开始觉得电子有内幕、不靠谱，于是又回去玩加拿大。 刚开…
👍1👏1
Posted without readable text
【二狗PC江湖｜赌友心声】 大家好，这次选择匿名分享我的经历。 我是小葡萄 我接触PC差不多两年了。 最开始，是因为身边不少朋友都在玩，我心里也有些好奇。刚好自己有Telegram，就在上面搜索相关软件，后来下载了一个平台，用卡密充了20块钱，第一次玩的是PP电子。 没想到刚开始没多久，就爆了300块钱。 现在回头看，那300块钱并不算多，却成了我走上赌博这条路的开始。因为第一次赢钱来得太容易，我慢慢产生了一种错觉，觉得这种钱似乎很好挣，只要继续玩，总还能遇到下一次。 后来玩得久了，我开始觉得电子太假，就转去玩PC。 刚接触PC的时候，我什么都不懂，也不会计算，基本上都是想到什么就下什么。那段时间输了不少，但我总觉得，不是游戏有问题，而是自己还没有找到方法。 有一次，我感觉自己好像发现了某种规律，于是开始按照自己的想法去打。可结果还是一直输。 后来我甚至认真研究过算法，想着只要把开奖规律弄明白，也许就能把以前输掉的钱赢回来。但研…
👍1
【二狗PC江湖｜赌友心声】 大家好，我叫阿土，湖南人，今年31岁。 前些年我做建材生意，手里攒下了一些家底。那时候生意做得还不错，人也慢慢有些飘了，后来开始接触赌博。 最早玩的是时时彩。 刚开始输赢不大，下注金额也能控制。可玩久了以后，胆子越来越大，下注也越来越重。后来时时彩停了，我又转去玩真人百家乐。 前前后后算下来，百家乐让我输了四十多万。 后来看到不少关于百家乐可能存在换牌、控牌的说法，心里越来越没底，也就不敢继续玩了。 今年6月份，经朋友介绍，我接触到了TG，也第一次开始玩PC28。 当时觉得这边有担保、有公开群，心里相对踏实一些，于是就在某宫娱乐平台充值了8000U，开始了自己的PC28之路。 可能真的是新人运气。 我清楚地记得，那天晚上我一直在看遗漏值，感觉极大、极小可能快要出了，于是押了： 数字26：50U 数字3：50U 结果那一期真的开出了26。 数字26是320倍赔率，50U直接中了16000U。看到账户余额…
【二狗PC江湖｜赌友故事征稿】 稿件一经采纳，即可获得38.8C起红包奖励。 每一个接触PC的人，背后可能都有一段不愿轻易说出口的故事。 有人曾经一夜高光，也有人因为上头输掉积蓄；有人把赢钱当作荣耀，也有人在失控以后，才真正明白及时停手的重要。 二狗PC江湖现面向所有赌友长期征稿。 我们想收集的不是包装出来的神话，而是真实发生过的经历： 第一次接触PC的故事 印象最深的一次输赢 上头、追损或翻本失败的经历 高光战绩与真实复盘 因赌博影响感情、家庭或生活的故事 及时收手、重新开始的经历 预测员、群管理和老玩家的江湖往事 那些一直想说，却没有地方说的赌友心声 投稿有奖励 稿件一经采纳，即可获得38.8C起红包奖励。 内容越真实、故事越完整、越有共鸣，奖励越高。优质稿件还会收录进频道长期栏目，并获得额外奖励。 投稿可以实名，也可以匿名。涉及用户名、余额、聊天记录和个人隐私，我们会按照投稿人的要求进行打码处理。 投稿格式 你的称呼…
❤3👍1
【二狗江湖人物志｜阿信】 大家好，我叫阿信。 我第一次接触PC28，是在半年前。 当时有个朋友一晚上输了15万U。听到这个数字以后，我对这个游戏产生了好奇：到底是什么玩法，能让一个人在这么短的时间里输掉这么多？ 刚开始接触的时候，我只会最基础的大小单双。后来玩得多了，慢慢开始研究组合、单挑，再到网盘2.0、2.8和单挑数字，各种玩法基本都尝试过。 我平时主要在腾博会的 @PK28 合集机器人上玩。除了玩法比较多以外，还有一点很吸引我，就是邀请好友可以获得千分之一的 返利。朋友产生流水后，自己也能获得一定返利，对经常玩的玩家来说，算是一项比较实在的福利。 有一天状态特别顺，我连续打中了几波。 从一开始盈利一万多，慢慢打到了六万多U。当天流水超过了二十二万U，账户余额最高的时候也到了十万U以上。 这六万多U虽然不足以改变我的人生，但确实给我的生活带来了一些改善。我也拿出一部分钱，给家里添置了不少东西。 赢钱的时候当然开心，但回过头来…
❤3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pcjianghu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“二狗PC28江湖” (@pcjianghu), 720 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pcjianghu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.