Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PawnStars Community

Channel

PawnStars Community

@pawnstarstg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,601subscribers

-177 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003189163476
TypeChannel
Username@pawnstarstg
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 26 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pawnstarstg

Growth

16,60116,77816,689.57 August 2026 — 16,778 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,778 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,770 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,752 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,727 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,713 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,698 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,679 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,648 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,601 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net -177. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,574–16,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:5816,601-47
14 Aug 2026, 16:2416,648-31
13 Aug 2026, 04:2716,679-19
12 Aug 2026, 06:4416,698-15
11 Aug 2026, 05:1816,713-14
10 Aug 2026, 03:2116,727-25
9 Aug 2026, 00:5816,752-18
8 Aug 2026, 00:2116,770-8
7 Aug 2026, 14:1616,778no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:0316,778first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 26 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.61%
avg views ÷ 16,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
434
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.691%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held7 (26 November 202514 August 2026)
Views total434
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,217 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 604176107115538626971158.4%
custom 534593503014319649712210.0%
custom 54249147113029246581199.78%
custom 6017157771907045891806.57%
custom 6021412890496473421746.08%
custom 5936138290519349485383.12%
custom 5244710862953941180292.38%
custom 6021755538692380189201.64%
custom 5280511481245361900171.40%
custom 530545642796223810440.329%
custom 519952820643198112130.247%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,217reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 7 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pawnstarstg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 November 2025 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC434 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 51995282064319811213

5 May 2026, 10:19 UTC≈5,380 views29 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 604176107115538626917custom 59361382905193494856custom 60214128904964734216

25 Dec 2025, 09:06 UTC≈19,800 views220 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎄 Merry Christmas & Happy Year-End from PawnStars! As the year comes to a close, we’re excited to celebrate an important milestone — PawnStars has officially launched, and we’ve already built an amazing, strong, and passionate community. Thank you for being part of this journey from the very beginning. 2026 is just around the corner, and it’s going to be big. 🚀 New features 🎮 New games ✨ Even more ways to have fun

custom 5345935030143196497122custom 604176107115538626949custom 542491471130292465830custom 60214128904964734217custom 52447108629539411804custom 53054564279622381044custom 60217555386923801894

1 Dec 2025, 12:20 UTC≈8,760 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations 🎉 @pawnstars_bot

custom 604176107115538626927custom 601715777190704589110custom 52447108629539411808custom 54249147113029246582custom 52805114812453619001

29 Nov 2025, 22:15 UTC≈8,610 views69 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations 🎉 @pawnstars_bot

custom 604176107115538626936custom 602141289049647342112custom 60217555386923801897custom 54249147113029246585custom 52447108629539411804custom 60171577719070458913custom 59361382905193494852

28 Nov 2025, 16:25 UTC≈10,400 views751 reactions10 Starsread 15 August 2026

500 🚀 on this post and we will giveaway 50 Rocket-Gifts to online random users in @pawnstars_bot

custom 6041761071155386269567custom 542491471130292465876custom 601715777190704589162custom 528051148124536190015custom 602141289049647342111custom 59361382905193494859custom 52447108629539411807custom 60217555386923801894

26 Nov 2025, 11:33 UTC≈11,800 views97 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Congratulations to the Winners Mode: Trade Up! @pawnstars_bot

custom 602141289049647342138custom 593613829051934948521custom 604176107115538626915custom 52447108629539411806custom 54249147113029246586custom 60171577719070458915custom 60217555386923801895custom 52805114812453619001

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pawnstarstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,212,511 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PawnStars Community” (@pawnstarstg), 16,601 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pawnstarstg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.