Photo, posted without a caption
β€16π₯4β‘2

Channel
@patwerrr
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
3,464subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002608878615 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @patwerrr |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/patwerrr |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 3,464 | -3 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 3,467 | -6 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 16:40 | 3,473 | -7 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 3,480 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 3,481 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 3,488 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 3,494 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:05 | 3,500 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 3,503 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 3,509 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 3,512 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 3,517 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 3,513 | +5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 3,508 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 3,509 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 3,510 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 3,510 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
423 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 208 | 49.2% | |
| π₯ | 133 | 31.4% | |
| β‘ | 41 | 9.69% | |
| π | 15 | 3.55% | |
| π― | 15 | 3.55% | |
| π³ | 6 | 1.42% | |
| π€ | 4 | 0.946% | |
| π₯° | 1 | 0.236% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @patwerrr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Photo, posted without a caption
β€16π₯4β‘2
Focused concentrated attention is significantly more powerful than scattered, unconcentrated attention. Outcomes follow attention: 1) Scattered attention leads to random, ordinary outcomes. 2) Concentrated attention leads to focused, extraordinary outcomes.
β‘15β€8
NYC. July 27th. DM me on X to connect in person.
β€6β‘2π₯2
You think youβll be happy once youβre married, make more money, pay off the house, reach the next level in business or finally solve the problem in front of you. But once one problem is solved, the next one is already waiting. Life is a never ending series of problems. Happiness is a mental habit. If you donβt practice it in the present, no future achievement will suddenly bring it to you. If you want to be happy,β¦
β€45π―12
If we do something, we do it right π«‘
β€7π₯2
Photo, posted without a caption
β€7π₯3
Join here: patwer.com/access
β€6π₯3
Keep getting messages asking if it's still worth joining. If you join through me you'll get access to my personal Telegram and can reach out whenever you have questions. I'll also share a full breakdown of my organic affiliate sauce that I've never shared publicly and never will. Why do I do that? Because when I promote something, I personally make sure it's 100% worth joining. See you at the top. Sooner or later β¦
π³6π―3
Sometimes you gotta take a risk in order to get rewarded.
β€9π₯2
The average fiat currency dies in 27 years.
π₯16β€1
Limited spots are being taken. If you have any questions DM me on X. Reading it π€
π₯11π€4
Here it is. The private network I've been talking about is The Foundation. It was built by my friend Tuan and I've personally been a member for the last few years. Inside are operators from affiliate, e-commerce, SaaS, AI, crypto, media buying and several other industries. A lot of the killers online are already inside. You'll recognize more names than you expect. This is not a course. It is not another public groβ¦
β€15π₯7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @patwerrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βPatrick Werner π¦ β (@patwerrr), 3,464 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/patwerrr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.