Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for parkers calls💎

Channel

parkers calls💎

@parkersinsiders

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,655subscribers

+2,849 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002468812130
TypeChannel
Username@parkersinsiders
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/parkersinsiders

Previous handles

@parkersinsiders was previously reachable at these 2 handles, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@parkersinsiders
held 27 August 202627 August 2026
@parkerscalls
held 7 August 20267 August 2026

Growth

316,6608,331.57 August 2026 — 13,806 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,806 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,857 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,021 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,104 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,143 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,187 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,242 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,346 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,611 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,611 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,908 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,302 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,614 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,660 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,587 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,606 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,638 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,655 subscribers16,6557 August 20264 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 28 days, net +2,849. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 15:1816,655+17
2 Sept 2026, 23:0716,638+32
1 Sept 2026, 22:1816,606+19
31 Aug 2026, 21:0416,587-73
30 Aug 2026, 17:5516,660+46
29 Aug 2026, 16:5716,614+312
28 Aug 2026, 20:0316,302+394
27 Aug 2026, 21:4315,908+297
27 Aug 2026, 05:3015,611no change
27 Aug 2026, 05:1515,611+15,608
17 Aug 2026, 15:383-14,343
16 Aug 2026, 07:3414,346+104
14 Aug 2026, 21:4414,242+55
13 Aug 2026, 10:1314,187+44
12 Aug 2026, 08:0814,143+39
11 Aug 2026, 08:4614,104+83
10 Aug 2026, 07:4714,021+70
9 Aug 2026, 08:5113,951+94
8 Aug 2026, 05:1613,857+51
7 Aug 2026, 16:0013,806first reading

Engagement

169 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.16%
avg views ÷ 16,655 subscribers
Avg views / post
859
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
141
of 169 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 131 of 136 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held169 (7 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total116,825
Reactions total3,152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
33s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,323 reactions across 153 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,16673.2%
🔥3919.04%
👍3508.10%
🥰741.71%
👀721.67%
👏641.48%
🐳491.13%
🙏290.671%
❤‍🔥250.578%
🫡180.416%
😍160.37%
🍾150.347%
💯150.347%
140.324%
110.254%
🏆110.254%
🤝30.069%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 153 of the 169 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 169 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
36
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 158 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @parkersinsiders. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 169 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:17 UTC≈1,040 views156 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

MASSIVE ANNOUNCEMENT INCOMING ⚠️ Hope everybody is having an amazing week! We are the #1 insider group on Solana, and there’s a reason we only drop calls once every few weeks or so. EVERY single one of the callouts is documented here in this Telegram, not a single deleted message or faked callout, check the timestamps for yourself! $PASSROO went 40x $Dege went 90x $PegeCoin WENT 144x $SHEGE went 20x $GIGATROL

111🔥24👍9👀7🙏3🥰2

31 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC≈2,130 views216 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @solanastackrsPhoto

$cat RECAP 🔔 We first sent the link in here to buy at 45k market cap, and ran it all the way to 729k all time high! That's an 18x call 🚀 We bought $28.9k into the chart on the DEV wallet, spent near 10k on DEX boosts, bought over 14k combined on our public fomo wallets on top of everyone (which we held to 0) and spent 5 figs in other marketing This was a successful project but we would've sent MUCH higher if wall

132👍32🐳18👀18🔥10🏆5🥰1

30 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC≈2,770 views128 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Looks like our best account's live access is removed for a month we are trying to get it fixed but it is not appealing yet You can check solscan links up in chat for yourself to see the 11k top holder sell that was caused by a drainer link dm'd to our top holder Everyone started to panic resulting in multiple other 5k+ fullclips aswell We bought so fucking much into the chart on that downtrend and throughout this

81🐳14👏13👀10🔥8👍2

30 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC≈2,400 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Yo can all of you fucking stop fudding in my chat and shut up while I try to fix this Thanks

36👀9🐳6👍4🥰3🫡32🍾2

30 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC≈3,720 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Are you fucking serious

13👏4🙏3

30 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC≈1,870 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @solanastackrs

Parker's live got banned tryna fix rn

4

30 Aug 2026, 02:37 UTC≈1,740 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @solanastackrsPhoto

Holding everything btw

8👍1

30 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @solanastackrs

I am about to blast even more in on my fomo wallet.

30 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC≈1,510 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @solanastackrs

MORE DEV BUYS

8

Showing the 12 most recent of 169 posts we hold for @parkersinsiders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“parkers calls💎” (@parkersinsiders), 16,655 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parkersinsiders.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.