6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,165–1,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 02:19
1,190
+7
15 Aug 2026, 02:43
1,183
+13
11 Aug 2026, 18:22
1,170
+2
8 Aug 2026, 15:17
1,168
-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:33
1,169
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:35
1,169
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 1,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
172
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
9 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,547
Reactions total
76
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 35s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5375091686215014974
59
77.6%
custom 5359821608598929297
9
11.8%
custom 5377463302731348558
5
6.58%
custom 5422681027661289804
2
2.63%
custom 5422640307076355401
1
1.32%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ПРОКАЧАЛИ ОПЫТ
6–7 августа в ПАНЭМ прошел обучающий тренинг «Технолог на пищевом предприятии: задачи, обязанности и стандарты» для технологов хлебопекарных, кондитерских и пищевых производств
Вместе с Еленой Самсоновой участники разобрали ключевые задачи современного технолога
Два дня были наполнены практическими кейсами и профессиональными обсуждениями
На обучение к нам приехали специалисты из разных городов. Чт…
ПАНЭМ СНОВА ПУТЕШЕСТВУЕТ ✈️
На этот раз наша команда побывала в Москве у нашего партнера – ГК Омега
🤩 В первый день мы посетили производство, познакомились с технологическими процессами и увидели, как обеспечивается высокое качество продукции
🤩 Во второй день нас ждали экскурсия по офису, лекция о специях и практический мастер-класс по приготовлению мясных блюд
Такие поездки – это не только новые знания и практич…
СЕЗОН ДЛЯ РАЗВИТИЯ ВАШЕГО ПРОИЗВОДСТВА
Совсем скоро стартует осенняя серия технологических семинаров и бизнес-мероприятий Панэм ↗️
🔗 Практика, новые технологии, актуальные решения и инструменты, которые можно внедрить в работу сразу после обучения!
▶️ Следите за нашими новостями и анонсами
Стоит ли вводить осеннее меню уже сейчас? 🍂
Именно в августе многие ждут начало осени, чтобы обновить меню. Но есть один нюанс: если начать готовиться только с приходом нового сезона, можно потерять первые продажи
Что можно сделать уже сейчас:
🟡добавить 2–3 сезонные новинки, не меняя все меню сразу
🟡 протестировать новые вкусы и собрать обратную связь от гостей
🟡 обучить персонал рассказывать о новинках
🟡 заранее…
ВТОРОЙ ДЕНЬ ТРЕНИНГА
Вчера прошел заключительный день тренинга «Управляющий розницей: стандарты, команда, продажи»
🤩 Сфокусировались на управлении персоналом: авторитет руководителя, стандарты продавца, подбор сотрудников, наставничество и мотивация
Участники разобрали реальные кейсы и получили готовые инструменты для работы:
— чек-лист руководителя
— стандарт продавца
— план 7-дневной стажировки
— алгоритмы для …
КАК ПРОШЕЛ ПЕРВЫЙ ДЕНЬ ТРЕНИНГА
«Управляющий розницей: стандарты, команда, продажи» от Светланы Курсовой
Говорили о главном: роли управляющего, приоритетах, делегировании и контроле, развитии продавцов и коммуникации с другими службами
Разобрали конкретные инструменты: матрицу Эйзенхауэра, правило 3 раз, алгоритм «Факт → Последствия → Договорённость → Контроль» и систему развития сотрудников за 15 минут в день
Гл…
custom 537509168621501497411
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @panem63. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 49,516 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Компания ПАНЭМ” (@panem63), 1,190 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panem63.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
