4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,967–2,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 00:14
2,970
-9
11 Aug 2026, 01:02
2,979
-8
7 Aug 2026, 17:25
2,987
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:18
2,987
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.41%
avg views ÷ 2,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
9.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 August 2025 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
42
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
368 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
177
48.1%
❤
146
39.7%
👍
38
10.3%
🎉
2
0.543%
🤝
2
0.543%
🤩
2
0.543%
⚡
1
0.272%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 RICHIE RICH GIVEAWAY ALERT! 🚨
Richie Rich is dropping rich vibes and rewards 💰
✨ Total Prize Pool:
$250 USDT + 1,500 RRR tokens
🏆 10 Winners
🎁 First 5 winners will receive:
- $50 USDT
- 200 RRR tokens each
Other 5 winners: 100 RRR tokens each
🗓 Giveaway Period:
Start: December 17, 2025
End: December 20, 2025
This giveaway is all about celebrating the community!
Winners will be selected fairly, and rewards wil…
🎉 ATHLETECOIN & P2B: Community Event Results Are In! 🎉
The exclusive campaign by ATHLETECOIN and P2B has officially wrapped up!
10 participants will each receive 100 $ATHX after ATHLETECOIN listing on P2B (admin will write to collect wallets after listing), with a total of 1000 $ATHX shared 💸
📬 The ATHLETECOIN team is fully responsible for managing the distribution.
Stay tuned for more exciting activities coming …
🔥 AthleteCoin and P2B Launch an Exclusive Event! 🔥
To celebrate the rise of AthleteCoin, we’re giving the community a massive reward boost - $2,000 worth of $ATHX is up for grabs! 💪
🏆 Rewards:
Total Prize Pool - 1,000 $ATHX (~$2,000)
10 winners - 100 $ATHX each
📅 Event Period:
Start: November 25, 2025
End: December 02, 2025
Complete the steps via the link and secure your chance to win rewards.
After giveaway, th…
💎 $MFG EVENTS on P2B! 🎯
🔥 Total Reward Pool: 888 USDT + $MFG bonuses!
Join the #ReferralGame and #HoldingCompetition with #MFG on #P2B!
🎁 Referral Game
👉 http://p2pb2b.com/referral-game/
🔗 Get your personal referral link.
👥 Invite friends to join and deposit $MFG.
💰 Earn points for every successful referral!
🏆 Top 5 participants will share 444 USDT, plus small automatic rewards in $MFG!
💎 Holding Competition
👉 h…
🔥 AERE Launches an Exclusive IEO - Giveaway! 🔥
👉 Join the Event: sweepwidget.com/c/94029-m9ebgf76
AERE is launching a massive community giveaway - featuring a dynamic prize pool of up to $30,000 USDT! 🚀
🎯 IEO Soft Cap: $300,000 USDT
🏆 Rewards:
10 winners will get 1% of the total IEO Soft Cap - up to $3,000 USDT each!
The higher the raise - the bigger the rewards!
📅 Event Period:
Start: October 15
End: November 28…
🎉 Salute & P2B: Community Event Results Are In! 🎉
The exclusive campaign by Salute and P2B has officially wrapped up! 5 participants will each receive $200 of SLT, with a total of $1,000 of SLT shared 💸
📬 The Salute team is fully responsible for managing the distribution.
Stay tuned for more exciting activities coming your way! 🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @p2blivecrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“P2B Live Crypto” (@p2blivecrypto), 2,970 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p2blivecrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.