Channel
@ozenx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,650subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001161826846 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ozenx |
| Created | 2 May 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ozenx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 6,650 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 6,658 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 6,662 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 6,669 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 6,672 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 6,672 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 2 May 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,014 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5368420833205173059 | 1,014 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,014reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2018 to 20 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ozenx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 May 2018 to 20 August 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Hi, Early Adopters! 👨💻 We’re giving out 1 invite for every 1 hour of music you’ve listened to! For example: if you’ve listened to 5 hours in total, you’ll receive 5 invites Additionally, every 1 hour of music you listen to in the future will also earn you 1 invite 🚀 Thank you for supporting us! ōzen 📷 Instagram | 🐣 X | 💬 Chat
custom 536842083320517305980
ozen vO.1.13-beta To access the player, go to @ozenexebot If you haven’t used a referral link to enter before, you can get one in the @ozenexecommunity Chat in order to be eligable to enter. From here you should check the pinned topic "Invites / Referrals 🎟" and choose an available link. If a page with "Find another link" appears - you should look for another link from a user with available invites. After access…
custom 536842083320517305967
Any Questions?
custom 536842083320517305924
Video, posted without a caption
custom 536842083320517305922
This Week #1 🏆 De Lacure - dál solai
custom 536842083320517305950
🚀 @ozenexebot
custom 536842083320517305958
That's everything we are, Ye! And they can't tell us nothing. #saveye
custom 536842083320517305959
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 536842083320517305952
(перевод в комментариях) Art is an authentic reflection of the creator - raw and unfiltered. But when labels step in to moderate your individuality, should it even be considered art? This is the dilemma Frank Ocean embodies, as he believed that - "It's about freedom of growth and making something on your own terms" And in accordance to that belief in 2016, Ocean - instead of conforming to his labels demands, chose…
custom 536842083320517305951
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 536842083320517305932
(перевод в комментариях) To every Working Class Hero: They exploit you when you’re young, They break you when you’re clever, They twist your dreams, and use them to own you forever. Imagine a world acknowledging their crimes. Imagine a world where decentralization shatters their lies ✊ Where everyone's freedom is the ultimate goal, And the power’s in your hands, not in their control. No more insignificance, no l…
custom 536842083320517305953
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 536842083320517305933
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ozenx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“õzen” (@ozenx), 6,650 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozenx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.