_

Channel
ㅤ𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗎𝗇𝖾
@oxozn3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,787subscribers
-450 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003653026813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oxozn3 |
| Created | 1 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oxozn3 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 9,787 | -152 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 9,939 | -192 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 10,131 | -106 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 10,237 | first reading |
Engagement
135 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.86%
- avg views ÷ 9,787 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 182
- 130 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 134
- of 135 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 135 (1 January 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,683 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 130 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oxozn3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 135 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
⛓ 𝖤𝗅𝗂𖹭𝗍 ⛓ #Alla 𝒹ℯ𝓁 🌟 Ak 💘 Alla 𝓊𝓃 Mood
Sticker, posted without a caption
⛓ 𝖤𝗅𝗂𖹭𝗍 ⛓ #WillemDafoe 𝒹ℯ𝓁 🌟 Ak 💘 Willem Dafoe 𝓊𝓃 Kinds of Kindness
Sticker, posted without a caption
⛓ 𝖤𝗅𝗂𖹭𝗍 ⛓ #YeoJingoo 𝒹ℯ𝓁 🌟 SV 💘 Yeo Jingoo 𝓊𝓃 Link
Sticker, posted without a caption
این لطفا
╭࣭╼ׄ ﹙𖹭﹚ #kimhyejun ⭒ 𝗍 . 𝗆𝗒 𝖻𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗒 𝖻𝗈𝗌𝗌 ᭢᜴꤬
Sticker, posted without a caption
╭࣭╼ׄ ﹙𖹭﹚ #kanghoon ⭒ 𝗍 . 𝗆𝗒 𝖻𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗒 𝖻𝗈𝗌𝗌 ᭢᜴꤬
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @oxozn3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 77,457 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@oueni · 13,81316 postsㅤㅤ𝗘𝗹𝗶𝗼𝘁ㅤㅤ🖤برای ایران
@Sticker_Eliot · 5,21616 posts𝁘D𝖾𝗐P𝖺𝖼𝗄
@Dew_Pack · 34,16912 posts𝗗𝗥𝗔𝗚𝗢𝗡 | پک استیکـر
@Dragonmutu · 11,4358 posts‣ 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 پک استیکر ؛
@Unince · 14,8338 postsㅤ𝗆𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗒'𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗒 🆕
@GisellePack · 2,7594 postsㅤяхонт.ㅤ
@jxnerby · 1,0194 posts^᪲ 𝚴𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄 استیکر کیدراما
@nabikdrama · 10,4854 postsrose doll ♡ رزي
@r1sxo · 334 posts 𝐶𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇́𝖾
@starvoil · 11,6104 postsㅤchae ‘s data
@ci1ev · 1302 postsㅤangelisa لیسا 🆕️
@cuulisa · 7322 posts white petal
@flkjer · 612 posts 𝗆︎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖻︎𝖾𝗅︎𝗅︎𝖾 پك جني
@jenstarl · 82 posts podong ’s
@jigoopack · 4272 poststeddy ’s home
@juh1n · 232 posts 𝖯︎𝖾𝗀︎𝗀︎𝗒 𝗉𝖺𝖼︎𝗄︎ 🖤
@peggypack · 4202 posts sui ‘z status.
@u1cie · 4722 postsㅤ𝓈 𝖾𝗆𝗋𝗒𝗌ㅤپک جدید !
@vteor · 592 postsangel cake
@winangl · 5832 postsㅤ𝖺𝗑ı𝗌ㅤ
@xtris · 1,2342 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ ㅤ𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗎𝗇𝖾” (@oxozn3), 9,787 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oxozn3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.