Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for eduard_ov

Channel

eduard_ov

@ov_eduard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,034subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001113541088
TypeChannel
Username@ov_eduard
Created14 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ov_eduard

Growth

3,0293,0363,032.56 August 2026 — 3,036 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,035 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,036 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,033 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,029 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,034 subscribers3,0346 August 202623 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,028–3,037 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 22:263,034+5
20 Aug 2026, 03:043,029-4
16 Aug 2026, 22:263,033-3
14 Aug 2026, 01:583,036+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:053,035-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:333,036first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 31 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 51s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

447 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30868.9%
❤‍🔥5111.4%
347.61%
custom 5326037211164978005245.37%
custom 5312359316580216113163.58%
custom 527391174859896397181.79%
💅51.12%
👀10.224%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ov_eduard. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC811 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Новий відоус, надобраніч

🔥47❤‍🔥62

7 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC797 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ой ой ой, красивіше ви сьогодні нічого не побачите, ну насолода для очей😍

🔥4custom 53123593165802161132

7 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC796 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Файна малинка

🔥11custom 53123593165802161133💅1

6 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC806 views35 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

ну наче нормас сітка для першої гри

19🔥7custom 53260372111649780057❤‍🔥2

26 Jun 2026, 10:46 UTC≈1,110 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salatpartyPhoto

APASHE повертається. SALATPARTY повертається. Велика EDM-сцена повертається в Київ! 28 серпня в Blockbuster Mall відбудеться подія, у яку ще нещодавно було важко повірити: APASHE x SALATPARTY. APASHE давно має особливий зв'язок з Україною. До повномасштабного вторгнення він тричі виступав на подіях SALATPARTY, під час війни публічно підтримав Україну і відвідав Київ для зйомок документальних матеріалів. 28 серпня

🔥18custom 53123593165802161133

23 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,150 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

why a u gae

❤‍🔥19🔥5custom 52739117485989639713👀1

17 Jun 2026, 20:08 UTC≈1,450 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Логотипчик❤️

🔥54custom 52739117485989639715custom 53123593165802161134❤‍🔥2

9 Jun 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,400 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥28❤‍🔥41

9 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,240 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Домалював нову анімацію в своєму стилі, скоро дропну

🔥19❤‍🔥6custom 53123593165802161134

9 Jun 2026, 07:29 UTC≈1,120 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Діжжжжжею тут, good morning ☀️

🔥3custom 53260372111649780051

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ov_eduard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 515,073 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“eduard_ov” (@ov_eduard), 3,034 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ov_eduard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.