10 Nov 2022, 11:25 UTC31 viewsread 22 August 2026
Большое спасибо ребятам за оперативные и точные решения! Всегда на связи и в любой момент готовы помочь с решениями. Обращаюсь уже не первый раз
Channel
Отзывы
@otzivise
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
—subscribers
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001897882320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otzivise |
| Created | 25 October 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otzivise |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 25 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
8 Nov 2022, 19:52 UTC32 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
25 Oct 2022, 19:19 UTC35 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
25 Oct 2022, 19:18 UTC34 viewsread 22 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC28 viewsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @otzivi991Photo
выполняем дз и не только
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC24 viewsread 22 August 2026
Презентация была выполнена качественно и в короткие сроки. Спасибо! Анти-плагиат прошла на 90 процентов!!!
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC25 viewsread 22 August 2026
Так, ну сам отзыв. Ребята провели огромную работу, помогли полностью. До самой сдачи курировали мой проект, делали правки и недочёты, которые мне не нравились. Вообщем, респект👍
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC24 viewsread 22 August 2026
Спасибо, прекрасные люди, вы делаете такое полезное дело
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC29 viewsread 22 August 2026
Спасибо большое за поддержку! Все очень быстро и без всякого промедления. Очень рекомендую в таких ситуациях. Осталась очень довольна. Буду обращаться ещё.
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC29 viewsread 22 August 2026
спасибо вам огромное за сделанный проект, просто лучшие! 🥰
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC32 viewsread 22 August 2026
Всё отлично, очень понравилось, что работа согласовывается по этапно с заказчиком, обслуживание тоже отличное, человек приятный в общении. Оплата возможна по частям, это тоже радует, так как внушает доверие, кто покупает услуги в первый раз. В общем, все понравилось, если ещё что-то надо будет, теперь буду знать к кому обратиться.
25 Oct 2022, 18:29 UTC22 viewsread 22 August 2026
@OpenProject1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @otzivise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 657,446 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“Отзывы” (@otzivise). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzivise.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.