Channel
@ossevc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,921subscribers
+671 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003053911236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ossevc @TMTT6 |
| Description | My silence says more than my words ever could @BVywbot |
| Created | 17 September 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ossevc |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 15:22 | 3,921 | +3,920 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 1 | -4,586 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 4,587 | +50 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 4,537 | +30 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 4,507 | -173 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 4,680 | -64 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 4,744 | +272 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 4,472 | +63 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 4,409 | +58 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 4,351 | +514 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 3,837 | +168 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 3,669 | +388 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 3,281 | -114 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 3,395 | +145 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 3,250 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 3,250 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 17 September 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (17 September 2025 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,295 |
| Reactions total | 533 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3,152 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 450 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5220087458963692225 | 366 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5886465533452229734 | 329 | 10.4% | |
| custom 5381889468393344022 | 308 | 9.77% | |
| custom 5922653055282585496 | 292 | 9.26% | |
| custom 5397802837621103073 | 281 | 8.91% | |
| 👻 | 260 | 8.25% | |
| custom 5922242361919809673 | 247 | 7.84% | |
| custom 5922552677601910696 | 233 | 7.39% | |
| custom 5334849796861619558 | 220 | 6.98% | |
| custom 5373099392620339270 | 80 | 2.54% | |
| custom 5467577557756975627 | 54 | 1.71% | |
| 🙏 | 32 | 1.02% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ossevc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 September 2025 to 4 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
"There are moments in life when the quiet around you becomes louder than any sound, forcing you to look inside yourself and face the truths you have been running from; it is in those silent, heavy hours that you realize true strength isn't about never falling down, but about finding the courage to pick up the broken pieces and keep walking forward into the unknown."
🙏32
It is a heartbreaking kind of pain when you realize that you can miss someone who is still alive, that you can grieve a person who hasn't died, but has simply chosen a life where you no longer exist; you are left standing in the wreckage of promises that were never meant to be kept, holding onto memories of a person who no longer exists, while forced to watch the rest of the world move forward as if your entire heart…
😭88
Signed محمد
Never regret loving someone, even if it ended in heartbreak, because a pure heart that loved sincerely is never a failure; the sadness you feel now is just the echo of how deeply you were capable of caring in a world that often forgets how to.
😭153
The most exhausting part of a broken heart isn't the initial shock of losing them, but the slow, daily agony of realizing how deeply they were woven into your routine. You catch yourself wanting to tell them about your day, only to remember that you no longer have the right to call them; you are left with a heart full of unspoken words and a soul tied to someone who has already found peace in your absence.
👻260
📬 حشة جماعية سرية للجميع اضغط لعرضها
custom 537309939262033927010
1:24 هَوِيتُ محبوبةً كأنّها استثناءٌ في هذا العالم، لا تشبه العابرين ولا تُشبه الحكايات المكرّرة. أحببتُها كما يُحبّ الإنسانُ قدَره، لا يسأل لماذا، ولا يملك أن يتراجع، لأنّ القلب حين يجد ما خُلق له لا يعودُ قادرًا على الإنكار. لم تكن مجرّد وجهٍ جميلٍ يُفتن النظر، بل كانت معنىً كاملًا يوقظ الروح. كانت حضورًا يبعث الطمأنينة في أكثر أيّامي اضطرابًا، وصوتًا يخفّف ثقل الأشياء دون أن يعد بشيء. معها بدا العالم أقلّ قسوة، و…
custom 537309939262033927070
الي يحب يوجهلي، اردها بالأفراح .
custom 54675775577569756271
Signed موساشي .
للمشاركة ب اي صورة @TSTT8Bot
Signed موساشي .
Musashi pinned «مسابقة صور راقيه يم موساشي الأول : 350ن رشق = طرد النجوم عالأسم 2* بالخاص3* اقبل مطورات بالخاص احسبهن *2 للمشاركة : @TSTT8Bot تبدأ الساعة 6:40 تتنتهي الساعة 8:12 ماكو شد الغي تعويض مركز اول بسيط قناة المسابقة : @TMTT6»
مسابقة صور راقيه يم موساشي الأول : 350ن رشق = طرد النجوم عالأسم 2* بالخاص3* اقبل مطورات بالخاص احسبهن *2 للمشاركة : @TSTT8Bot تبدأ الساعة 6:40 تتنتهي الساعة 8:12 ماكو شد الغي تعويض مركز اول بسيط قناة المسابقة : @TMTT6
Signed موساشي .
Sticker, posted without a caption
دقايق
custom 54675775577569756278
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @ossevc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ossevc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nothing” (@ossevc), 3,921 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ossevc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.