Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for osho.original

Channel

osho.original

@oshooriginal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,017subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166708246
TypeChannel
Username@oshooriginal
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 31 July 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/oshooriginal

Growth

1,0161,0171,016.528 August 2026 — 1,017 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,017 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,016 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,017 subscribers28 August 20264 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,016–1,017 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 21:171,017+1
1 Sept 2026, 14:431,016-1
28 Aug 2026, 23:151,017no change
28 Aug 2026, 23:011,017first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 13s
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

340 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20760.9%
👍5616.5%
❤‍🔥185.29%
😭185.29%
🔥123.53%
😐72.06%
🤬72.06%
🌚41.18%
🙈30.882%
😁20.588%
🙏20.588%
👎10.294%
👏10.294%
💔10.294%
🥰10.294%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2024 to 4 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Oct 2024, 13:20 UTC≈3,570 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/ashvan.sa?igsh=MWo3am9vNnRkcnF1Yg== پیج اینستاگرام

16 Aug 2024, 14:17 UTC≈4,770 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔻 مدیتیشن هاله مراقبتی زمان این مراقبه هر شب قبل از خواب و صبحها اولین کار بعد از بیدار شدن از خواب مدت زمان چهار تا پنج دقیقه . مرحله اول یک هاله تصور کنید. روی تخت خود بنشینید و یک هاله حفاظتی اطراف بدن خود در نظر بگیرید. این لایه باید چیزی حدود ده تا بیست سانت با بدن فاصله داشته باشد. شکل آن مثل بدن خودتان است و به همان صورت بدن شما را در بر گرفته است و آن را حفاظت میکند درست مانند یک غلاف بعد در حالی که این حس را

38👍4🔥4

16 Aug 2024, 13:37 UTC≈3,230 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

20👍2🔥2

16 Aug 2024, 13:34 UTC≈3,020 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔻تو باید خودت را به یک جشن تبدیل کنی. . اُشو 📕 کتـاب Gold Nuggets قطعات طلایی ترجمه https://t.me/oshooriginal

❤‍🔥111

16 Aug 2024, 13:33 UTC≈2,960 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026

نکته دوم که باید به خاطر داشت: برخی افراد ممکن است متوجه شده باشند که حیوانات هرگز از عمل جنسی لذت نمی‌برند. در آمیزش جنسی حیوانات، هیچ لذتی ندارند. به بابون‌ها، میمون‌ها، سگ‌ها یا هر نوع حیوانی نگاه کنید. در عمل جنسی آنها نمی‌توان فهمید که لذت می‌برند یا خیر. به نظر می‌رسد که این یک عمل کاملاً مکانیکی است، یک نیروی طبیعی که آنها را به سوی آن می‌کشد. اگر کسی تا به حال آمیزش جنسی میمون‌ها را دیده باشد، باید متوجه شده

👍2014😁2❤‍🔥1👎1

16 Aug 2024, 13:33 UTC≈2,430 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026

اُشو عزیز تفاوت بین رابطه جنسی معمولی و رابطه جنسی تانترایی چیست؟ . رابطه جنسی معمولی و رابطه جنسی تانترایی کاملا متفاوت هستند. عمل جنسی معمولی فقط یک تخلیه انرژی است، شبیه به یک عطسه - انرژی تخلیه می‌شود و فرد احساس راحتی می‌کند. این عملی خلاقانه نیست بلکه مخرب است. فقط یک درمان لحظه ای است. کمک می‌کند فرد آرام شود، نه بیشتر. . رابطه جنسی تانترایی اساساً متفاوت است. این برای تخلیه نیست، برای پرتاب انرژی نیست. این بر

👍2317❤‍🔥1👏1

13 Aug 2024, 08:02 UTC≈2,070 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

12🔥2👍1

12 Aug 2024, 06:33 UTC≈2,040 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026

همانطور که پیش بینی میشد حساب اینستاگرام osho.original برای بار دوم توسط اینستاگرام و بخاطر ریپورت زیاد از دسترس خارج شد.

😭18🤬7😐75🌚4🙈3💔1

1 Aug 2024, 06:37 UTC≈2,510 views26 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

20❤‍🔥5👍1

31 Jul 2024, 07:23 UTC≈2,470 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔻در عادت ماندن، آسان اَست هوشیاری، دشوار خواهد بود - ولی فقط در ابتدا. . اُشـــو 📕 کتـاب Gold Nuggets قطعات طلایی ترجمه: https://t.me/oshooriginal

4🔥4👍2

31 Jul 2024, 07:22 UTC≈2,700 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔻اشو محبوب در کارهایی مثل نظافت و تمیزکاری که به نظر می‌رسد هیچ فضایی برای خلاقیت باقی نمی‌گذارند، چگونه می توانیم خلاق باشیم؟ . 🔻 پاسخ: سال‌ها کار به عنوان یک مامور پُست - به همان اندازه زیباست که نوشتن یک کتاب یا یک نمایشنامه - زندگی از چیزهای کوچک تشکیل شده است، آنها به شرطی با عظمت می شوند که عاشق باشید. بنابراین هر چیزی میتواند فوق العاده و با عظمت باشد. اما اگر عشقی در میان نباشد، آنوقت نفس Ego شما مدام می‌گوید

17👍2🙏2

31 Jul 2024, 07:18 UTC≈1,990 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🔻افکار، جایگزین آگاهی هستند. . اُشـــو 📕 کتـاب Gold Nuggets قطعات طلایی ترجمه: https://t.me/oshooriginal

13

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @oshooriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mazdafar.Momeni
@Mazdafar · 43,043
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“osho.original” (@oshooriginal), 1,017 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oshooriginal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.