Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

Channel

ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

@oro_barca_fans2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,637subscribers

+10,498 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002164484556
TypeChannel
Username@oro_barca_fans2
Description🔵🔴 ORO BARCA FANS 💙❤️ Latest Barça transfer news, match updates, player reactions & rumors in Afan Oromo! 🚨 Real-time news 📸 Training pics & behind the scenes 🔥 Rashford, Yamal, Pedri & more 📲 Stay updated – share with Culers!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held41
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/oro_barca_fans2

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

42,13957,14749,64315 August 2026 — 42,139 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,222 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,305 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,310 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,380 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,424 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,513 subscribers23 August 2026 — 42,644 subscribers24 August 2026 — 42,806 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,896 subscribers26 August 2026 — 43,058 subscribers27 August 2026 — 43,150 subscribers28 August 2026 — 43,254 subscribers29 August 2026 — 43,373 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,464 subscribers31 August 2026 — 43,552 subscribers1 September 2026 — 43,598 subscribers2 September 2026 — 43,673 subscribers4 September 2026 — 43,762 subscribers6 September 2026 — 43,935 subscribers9 September 2026 — 44,120 subscribers12 September 2026 — 43,998 subscribers13 September 2026 — 43,726 subscribers15 September 2026 — 43,637 subscribers17 September 2026 — 44,373 subscribers27 September 2026 — 48,288 subscribers4 October 2026 — 48,383 subscribers9 October 2026 — 51,830 subscribers13 October 2026 — 56,956 subscribers14 October 2026 — 57,147 subscribers15 October 2026 — 56,021 subscribers16 October 2026 — 54,725 subscribers17 October 2026 — 54,332 subscribers18 October 2026 — 53,882 subscribers19 October 2026 — 53,622 subscribers20 October 2026 — 53,353 subscribers21 October 2026 — 52,873 subscribers22 October 2026 — 52,493 subscribers23 October 2026 — 52,442 subscribers24 October 2026 — 52,375 subscribers25 October 2026 — 52,637 subscribers52,63715 August 202625 October 2026
41 measurements spanning 71 days, net +10,498. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,888–59,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 10:4652,637+262
24 Oct 2026, 10:3052,375-67
23 Oct 2026, 10:4652,442-51
22 Oct 2026, 11:5652,493-380
21 Oct 2026, 05:4152,873-480
20 Oct 2026, 06:5053,353-269
19 Oct 2026, 05:3653,622-260
18 Oct 2026, 06:1953,882-450
17 Oct 2026, 09:3754,332-393
16 Oct 2026, 12:4454,725-1,296
15 Oct 2026, 16:1656,021-1,126
14 Oct 2026, 19:1757,147+191
13 Oct 2026, 07:0656,956+5,126
9 Oct 2026, 05:2051,830+3,447
4 Oct 2026, 20:1648,383+95
27 Sept 2026, 09:2048,288+3,915
17 Sept 2026, 16:4244,373+736
15 Sept 2026, 13:5843,637-89
13 Sept 2026, 20:3843,726-272
12 Sept 2026, 00:1943,998first reading

Engagement

2,429 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 136 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.46%
avg views ÷ 52,637 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
1,119 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.257%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,119
of 2,429 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 821 of 1,119 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held2,429 (13 August 2026 – 25 October 2026)
Views total1,446,155
Reactions total3,128
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Oct 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈17,700
Videos
≈35
Links
≈14,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,716 reactions across 710 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.19% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1415.19%
👍1354.97%
🤗1314.82%
😇1244.57%
🙏1234.53%
🍾1174.31%
⚡1094.01%
😁1094.01%
🤣1073.94%
🤩1073.94%
🎉1013.72%
🔥993.65%
🏆953.50%
🤝923.39%
🎄883.24%
😍863.17%
😡853.13%
🥰853.13%
👏802.95%
🙊792.91%
15 further kinds62322.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 712 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,716 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 29 September 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Oct 2026, 22:35 UTC308 views4 reactionsread 26 October 2026
Photo

🎙 Do you think your second-half performance is the kind of football Barcelona should be aiming for? 👤 Pedri González: 🔴 Yes. I think we were much better after the break and clearly had control of the game. 🔵 But we need to be more alert to sudden shifts in momentum and the opposition’s counterattacks. 🔴 We conceded from a counterattack, and that’s one of Real Madrid’s main strengths. We expected it before the game…

🤔4

25 Oct 2026, 22:29 UTC285 views2 reactionsread 26 October 2026

🎙 A strong start and a run of consecutive wins made the team look unstoppable. Did that affect you? 👤 Pedri González: 🔴 No. We have to understand that what we were doing was incredibly difficult. 🔵 It’s impossible to win the league by winning every single game. 🔴 Now we need to focus on the next match and remember that there’s still a long way to go. The title won’t be decided here. ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

🎉1🤝1

25 Oct 2026, 22:22 UTC256 viewsread 26 October 2026
Photo

👤 Pedri González: 🔴 I don’t think we played well overall. 🔵 We weren’t ourselves in the first half, and we were missing a lot of things we could have done better. 🔴 We managed to level the game in the second half and improved our performance, but then Real Madrid scored on a counterattack—the kind of move we expected from them. 🔵 We didn’t defend that attack well. Real have quality players up front, and they made…

25 Oct 2026, 22:16 UTC210 viewsread 26 October 2026

🔴 Second straight defeat of the season ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

25 Oct 2026, 22:09 UTC199 viewsread 26 October 2026

What a frustrating loss. We controlled the game from start to finish, but individual mistakes cost us the win. ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

25 Oct 2026, 21:56 UTC242 views1 reactionsread 26 October 2026

Real Madrid’s goal video ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

🥰1

25 Oct 2026, 21:56 UTC222 viewsread 26 October 2026

⏺ Barcelona 1–2 Real Madrid ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

25 Oct 2026, 21:30 UTC313 views2 reactionsread 26 October 2026

⏺ Raphinha! Barcelona 1–1 Real Madrid ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™

🤗1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,429 posts we hold for @oro_barca_fans2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dhugaawwan Dinqisiisoo
@Amazing_facts33 · 66,362
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 August 2026
BIROO BARNOOTA OROMIYAA (BBO)
@BirooBarnotaaOromiya1 · 117,798
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 15 August 2026
ORO SPORT
@Liveisporti · 54,320
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 25 August 2026
𝐎𝐑𝐎 𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘™
@Oromanchestercity · 59,768
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ORO BARCA FANS💙❤️™” (@oro_barca_fans2), 52,637 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oro_barca_fans2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.