Channel
@oralpath_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,506subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001433356059 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oralpath_ru |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oralpath_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 6,506 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 6,504 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (17 February 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,150 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🔺История о том, когда диагноз очевиден, а причина — нет 👆Пациент обратился с довольно яркой клинической картиной: множественные болезненные эрозивно-язвенные элементы на слизистой оболочке полости рта, характерные для многоформной экссудативной эритемы. 🔬Диагноз мы поставили достаточно уверенно — клиническая картина позволяла. ❔Но дальше возник самый интересный вопрос: а что стало триггером? И вот здесь начинается…
🔺История о том, что не нужно ничего плохого брать в рот. А только проверенное))) 🧑🧒🧒Нам с детства говорят, что не нужно ничего плохого брать в рот. Но становясь взрослыми, мы часто нарушаем это правило. А иногда это может привезти к тяжелым последствиям. ✅На прием пришел молодой мужчина. Жалобы самые обычные: уже около двух недель беспокоит дискомфорт при глотании справа, ощущение, что «что-то мешает». Температур…
❤️🔥Когда стресс становится триггером начала заболевания. На фото — клинический случай молодого мужчины с типичной формой красного плоского лишая слизистой оболочки полости рта. Характерный признак — белые кружевные полосы (сетки Уикхема), расположенные симметрично на слизистой щек. Несмотря на отсутствие выраженной боли у многих пациентов, заболевание требует наблюдения и комплексного подхода. Что известно о КПЛ? …
🔬 Amivantamab: новая надежда для пациентов с рецидивирующим и метастатическим плоскоклеточным раком головы и шеи На конференции ASCO 2026 были представлены результаты исследования амивантамаба (amivantamab) у пациентов с рецидивирующим/метастатическим плоскоклеточным раком головы и шеи, прогрессировавшим после стандартной терапии. Полученные данные привлекли значительное внимание онкологического сообщества благодаря…
🩸 ТРОМБОЦИТОПЕНИЯ: ОПАСНЫЕ СИГНАЛЫ ВО РТУ, КОТОРЫЕ НЕЛЬЗЯ ИГНОРИРОВАТЬ Вы привыкли, что кровоточивость дёсен — это стоматология? А вот и нет. Иногда ротовая полость становится зеркалом смертельно опасного состояния — тромбоцитопении. ⚠️ Что это такое? Тромбоцитопения — критическое снижение уровня тромбоцитов (клеток, отвечающих за свёртывание крови). Норма — от 150 до 400×10⁹/л. При уровне ниже 30×10⁹/л любое, даже с…
🔬 ПИОГЕННАЯ ГРАНУЛЕМА vs ПЕРИФЕРИЧЕСКАЯ ГИГАНТОКЛЕТОЧНАЯ ГРАНУЛЕМА: где грань? Две нозологии, которые в клинической практике нередко объединяют термином «эпулис», требуют принципиально разного подхода к лечению. Ошибочная верификация — прямой путь к рецидиву. Разбираем ключевые критерии. 🩸 КЛИНИЧЕСКАЯ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКА Пиогенная гранулема (granuloma pyogenicum) Реактивная пролиферация соединительной ткани в ответ на хр…
Photo, posted without a caption
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @oralpath_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой диагноз?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Патология слизистой рта” (@oralpath_ru), 6,506 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oralpath_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.