Posted without readable text

Channel
๐ข๐จ๐๐ โผ๏ธ
@ooouuuuch
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
15,419subscribers
-284 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001821174245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ooouuuuch |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ooouuuuch |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 15,419 | -25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 15,444 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 15,454 | -17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 15,471 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 15,484 | -27 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 15,511 | -25 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 15,536 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 15,552 | -24 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 15,576 | -37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 15,613 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 15,624 | -19 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 15,643 | -19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 15,662 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 15,684 | -19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 15,703 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 15,703 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 February 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 51s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
795 reactions across 14 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐คฃ | 353 | 44.4% | |
| ๐ | 104 | 13.1% | |
| ๐ | 74 | 9.31% | |
| ๐ฑ | 58 | 7.30% | |
| ๐คฎ | 38 | 4.78% | |
| ๐ค | 29 | 3.65% | |
| โค | 23 | 2.89% | |
| ๐คฌ | 23 | 2.89% | |
| ๐คก | 19 | 2.39% | |
| ๐คฏ | 15 | 1.89% | |
| ๐ | 14 | 1.76% | |
| ๐ | 11 | 1.38% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 1.13% | |
| ๐ค | 8 | 1.01% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 5 | 0.629% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.377% | |
| ๐ฅ | 3 | 0.377% | |
| ๐ข | 2 | 0.252% | |
| ๐คฉ | 2 | 0.252% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 0.126% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.126% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 795reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2025 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Tenรญa prisa por llegar al trabajo. https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh https://t.me/ObservadorDJSincensura
๐ฑ33๐คฌ11โค3๐2๐คฉ1
ยฟQuรฉ tipo de juegos tienen? https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh https://t.me/ObservadorDJSincensura
๐คฃ66๐12๐ค3๐ข2๐1
ยกUn verdadero caballero! ๐ https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh https://t.me/ObservadorDJSincensura
๐คฃ75๐3๐ฅฐ3๐คก2โค1
ยกBuen deporte fรบtbol! https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh https://t.me/ObservadorDJSincensura
๐24๐คฃ17โค6๐ฅ3
Mecรกnico en el trabajo ๐ https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh https://t.me/ObservadorDJSincensura
๐31๐6๐3๐2๐ฅฐ2๐จ1
Entonces ยฟpor quรฉ? Abuela al viento... https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh
๐ค21๐10
Aquรญ ando experimentando una estrategia ๐ฉธ https://t.me/ooouuuuch https://t.me/+cZdgMf9kdiw2Mjhh
๐คฃ54๐3๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ooouuuuch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 1,552,937 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ooouuuuch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
named in 34 posts, 8 August 2026 โ 18 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ข๐จ๐๐ โผ๏ธโ (@ooouuuuch), 15,419 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ooouuuuch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.