Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ололош

Channel

Ололош

@ololosh_ololoev228

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

4,874subscribers

-267 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002644425398
TypeChannel
Username@ololosh_ololoev228
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/ololosh_ololoev228

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,8745,1415,007.57 August 2026 — 5,141 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,140 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,095 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,988 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,963 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,943 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,923 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,919 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,961 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,976 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,982 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,984 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,981 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,954 subscribers29 September 2026 — 4,914 subscribers6 October 2026 — 4,930 subscribers12 October 2026 — 4,874 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net -267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,834–5,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 20:184,874-56
6 Oct 2026, 14:394,930+16
29 Sept 2026, 17:004,914-40
19 Sept 2026, 10:594,954-27
14 Sept 2026, 13:404,981-3
11 Sept 2026, 09:224,984+2
6 Sept 2026, 22:594,982+6
2 Sept 2026, 02:074,976+15
30 Aug 2026, 07:094,961+42
27 Aug 2026, 10:434,919-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:574,923-20
20 Aug 2026, 16:474,943-20
17 Aug 2026, 15:064,963-25
14 Aug 2026, 15:254,988-107
11 Aug 2026, 07:515,095-45
8 Aug 2026, 07:355,140-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:185,141first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,050 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 545872486995067706222321.2%
custom 521987256456997216617716.9%
custom 540219490124274840515114.4%
custom 542014707426604426011611.0%
custom 5276468628529620368918.67%
custom 5469780081410853646817.71%
custom 5375403694114218373625.90%
custom 5467696051609687946403.81%
custom 5276182884355432775323.05%
custom 5240143925443837064312.95%
custom 5204422132687186887171.62%
custom 5267501290866363272161.52%
custom 538427754322435317360.571%
custom 538183822084356592940.381%
custom 535040013397867131730.286%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,050 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ololosh_ololoev228. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC843 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026

План такой: находим казахские корни у тех, кто насиловал ее без гандона, а затем преподносим это так, что она убивала казахов (зиготку с казахской кровью) по этническому признаку. Работаем, братья

custom 542014707426604426039custom 52198725645699721665custom 52764686285296203684

9 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,250 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В день, когда сдохнет эта тварь, Россия и Украина заключат мир

custom 527646862852962036869custom 52198725645699721668custom 54697800814108536468custom 52044221326871868874

3 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈2,170 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сделайте такой же гиф с Кашей

custom 521987256456997216640custom 52764686285296203683custom 54587248699506770623

2 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,320 views88 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Video

Хейтишь Зио = хохол Хейтишь Братишкина = соя Хейтишь Айшоуспида Аслана Шукаша = а у него нет хейтеров🤣

custom 545872486995067706270custom 521987256456997216610custom 52764686285296203685custom 52044221326871868873

25 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC≈3,320 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Я после чм когда Аргентина проиграла😭🤬

custom 545872486995067706231custom 54021949012427484057custom 52044221326871868874custom 52198725645699721662custom 54201470742660442602

10 Jul 2026, 04:41 UTC≈4,390 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 546769605160968794636custom 52198725645699721668custom 52401439254438370645custom 53754036941142183731custom 54201470742660442601

27 Jun 2026, 05:19 UTC≈5,610 views83 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Он реален..😱

custom 546978008141085364667custom 54587248699506770625custom 52198725645699721663custom 52764686285296203683custom 54201470742660442602custom 52675012908663632721custom 53754036941142183731custom 53842775432243531731

25 Jun 2026, 11:57 UTC≈4,840 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026

посмотрел слив Лизы Василенко,а у неё щавель. День испорчен

custom 540219490124274840578custom 52401439254438370647custom 52675012908663632725custom 54676960516096879464

23 Jun 2026, 05:22 UTC≈4,950 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ларп-ютуберы. Недавно расфоршенный тренд, где чуваки пародируют популярных ютуберов со времён 2016-го, делая похожие каналы, с добавлением слова «ларп» в ник. Может про них сделать ролик?

custom 545872486995067706237custom 521987256456997216615custom 52401439254438370646

20 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC≈4,560 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

В такого бы сразу с яйцами вошёл

custom 545872486995067706263custom 542014707426604426014custom 52198725645699721668custom 52675012908663632727

18 Jun 2026, 00:03 UTC≈5,060 views68 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тикток-мем Костя Волков поймал головой ВОГ, но выжил, сильно обгорел и был эвакуирован. Костя Волков снова доказал что бессмертный, выжил с шансом <1%.

custom 542014707426604426053custom 53842775432243531735custom 52198725645699721663custom 52764686285296203683custom 52401439254438370642custom 53754036941142183731custom 54587248699506770621

16 Jun 2026, 23:58 UTC≈4,350 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 545872486995067706211custom 52764686285296203682custom 54697800814108536462

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ololosh_ololoev228. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ололош” (@ololosh_ololoev228), 4,874 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ololosh_ololoev228.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.