Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Нарочито спокойно

@ofisny_klerk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,175subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001816470985
TypeChannel
Username@ofisny_klerk
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ofisny_klerk

Growth

1,1751,1801,177.57 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,175 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,174–1,181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:281,175-3
10 Aug 2026, 23:011,178-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:401,179-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:011,180no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:481,180first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.7%
avg views ÷ 1,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (13 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,331
Reactions total220
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

315 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15950.5%
custom 52088847411466976164514.3%
🔥299.21%
❤‍🔥247.62%
custom 5348417993686676514237.30%
💘237.30%
custom 5354940970972510201123.81%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ofisny_klerk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC113 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Возобновила силовые тренировки с моим мастером Ощущаю себя как котёнок на розовом коврике на фото 1 🥰 Весь июль жёстко тренили и включали разные мышцы моего тела. Я вновь почувствовала себя сильной, подтянутой и красивой! Пока я не в городе, не хожу на групповые занятия офлайн, поэтому такие онлайн-тренировки очень спасают 🧘 А меняется ли у вас спортивная активность летом?

14custom 52088847411466976167🔥4❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC263 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мамы не знают, что делать со временем, которое у них появляется внезапно Вот вдруг случилось чудо — муж приехал из командировки раньше или бабушка забрала малыша погулять. У мамы появился свободный час, а то и полтора. Она хватается за голову, не понимая, что же делать с этим счастьем. Перебирая возможные варианты, у неё не находится сил, чтобы выбрать то, что она действительно сейчас хочет: прибраться, попить кофе

26custom 534841799368667651412❤‍🔥10💘2custom 52088847411466976161custom 53549409709725102011

31 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC315 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Надо быть открытым людям, терпимым к людям, искать в них прежде всего лучшее. Умение искать и находить лучшее, просто хорошее, «заслоненную красоту» обогащает человека духовно. Заметить красоту в природе, в поселке, городе, не говоря уже — в человеке, сквозь все заслоны мелочей — это значит расширить сферу жизни, сферу того жизненного простора, в которой живет человек». Дмитрий Лихачёв, «Письма о добром» ❤️

37custom 520888474114669761613💘7custom 53484179936866765143custom 53549409709725102011

29 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC324 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥2514custom 53484179936866765148custom 53549409709725102012❤‍🔥1💘1

29 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC316 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не забывайте улыбаться Сегодня делала тренировку Animal Flow. Классная практика, я уже через 30 минут удохлась. Вся мокрая была. И вот в середине практики, когда ты скрючен и замучен, тренер говорит: «не забывайте улыбаться». Я решила, что это хороший совет. Даже в самые трудные и потные моменты не забывать улыбаться. Мозгу это даёт сигнал, что всё хорошо, ведь в конце нас ждёт поза «счастливого ребёнка», а после

💘13custom 53549409709725102018custom 520888474114669761672

13 Jul 2026, 07:08 UTC513 views95 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Выращивать младенца гораздо легче общиной Я убеждена, что мама не должна сидеть одна с ребёнком в четырёх стенах. Ей нужна помощь и свобода в пространстве. Ощутила такой контраст, когда приехали с Аглаей к моим родителям в дом. Тут ещё моя 8-летняя сестра и младший брат. Все водятся по мере своих сил. Во-первых, я могу спокойно есть, ходить в душ, на спорт и даже в баню. Зная, что с ребёнком посидят 15–30–60 минут

66custom 520888474114669761617❤‍🔥12

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ofisny_klerk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,160,725 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нарочито спокойно” (@ofisny_klerk), 1,175 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ofisny_klerk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.