Помните этот момент? Легендарный образ, который спустя 10 лет вновь вызвал настоящую бурю эмоций у поклонников и не только…) А ведь с тех пор прошло уже почти два года💔
🔥30❤9🥰6😁2🤗1

Channel
@nv_poklonskayaFAN
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,443subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002056797746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nv_poklonskayaFAN |
| Created | 25 March 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nv_poklonskayaFAN |
@nv_poklonskayaFAN was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 1,443 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 1,449 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 1,450 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 1,451 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 1,452 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,462 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 1,462 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
796 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 366 | 46.0% | |
| 🥰 | 126 | 15.8% | |
| 😁 | 125 | 15.7% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 6.91% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 4.77% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 3.77% | |
| 😱 | 30 | 3.77% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 1.88% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.503% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.377% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 0.251% | |
| custom 5328171071176713918 | 1 | 0.126% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.126% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 796 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Помните этот момент? Легендарный образ, который спустя 10 лет вновь вызвал настоящую бурю эмоций у поклонников и не только…) А ведь с тех пор прошло уже почти два года💔
🔥30❤9🥰6😁2🤗1
Говорят, итальянцы очень любят это фото🤭 Интересно, почему?😄 p.s. вопрос риторический
🥰26❤17😁5🤗2
Успех — это когда в санкционный список ЕС тебя внесли еще в 2014 году, а твоего начальника только в 2026-м😁
😁26🥰10💯8❤5
Фейки вышли на новый уровень… Пока одна в Крыму записывает «кружочки» с берега Черного моря, в Крыму. «Вторая» ходит по Москве, раздаёт интервью🫠 А мы всё ещё удивляемся интернет-разводилам. И дипфейкам… Тут вот человек воочию не разобрался: Wer ist diese Frau? P. S. Автор, если ты не шутишь и реально думаешь что это Поклонская, то у меня для тебя плохие новости. А если ты вот с этой «Натальей Поклонской» — юристо…
👍9😁4😱4❤3🥰2
«Та часть тебя, что видима для глаз, Всеобщего достойна восхищенья; Немолчной похвалы правдивый глас И у врагов находит одобренье. Увенчан лик твой внешней похвалой; Но те же судьи, до хулы охочи, Всё то в тебе, что связано с душой И глазу не доступное, порочат. Им кажется, что суть души твоей Худыми проявляется делами; Послушать этих праведных судей, - Цветок твой дивный пахнет сорняками; Прекрасный, стал он жерт…
❤29🥰5👏1😁1
Нас ждет что-то интересненькое☺️ От Натальи Владимировны кружок в студию, а от нас – бекстейдж со съемок♥️
❤30🥰8🔥6
Глядя на это фото, сделанное сегодня во время открытого заседания дискуссионного клуба на тему «Референдум или государственный переворот», проведённого со студентами, ловишь себя на одной мысли. Похоже, в зале был тот, кто очень сильно топил за госпереворот. Если посмотреть на взгляд Натальи Владимировны, как думаете, сколько лет строгого режима она ему насчитала? 😅🙈
❤27😁12🔥4🥰4💔2
«Несмотря на внешнюю хрупкость и мягкость, женщины разных стран и многих поколений не раз доказывали свою силу. Женский характер делает их непобедимыми — они просто не сдаются»
❤20🥰7👍5😁1
FAN Натальи Поклонской заблокировал(-а) Вас
😁41😱23👍8🔥5👏2💯1🙏1
Переиграл, получается?😁 p.s. публикация носит исключительно юмористический характер
😁22🥰15❤6custom 53281710711767139181
«… К кому ещё не обращался, ни у кого не было такого сопереживания и вдумчивого желания реально помочь. Были потом проверки, ей инициированные... Но не всем чиновникам это нравилось. Вот такие люди, как Наталья Владимировна, должны быть во власти!» , – и в чем он неправ!?👏🤝
❤28🥰9👍3👏1
Мы тут забыли про одну немаловажную дату… 21 марта нашему сообществу ВКонтакте исполнилось 12 лет! Группа чуть младше возвращённого в состав России Крыма☺️ 12 лет — это огромный срок. За это время менялись события, люди, обстоятельства, но многие из тех, кто пришел к нам в 2014 году остались. Я хочу сказать «спасибо» каждому из вас. И тем «старожилам», кто помнит первые посты и первые победы, и тем, кто пришел к на…
❤39🥰10👏5😱3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @nv_poklonskayaFAN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы думаете, подошла бы кандидатура Натальи Поклонской на должность Уполномоченного по правам человека в России?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FAN Натальи Поклонской” (@nv_poklonskayaFAN), 1,443 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nv_poklonskayaFAN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.