Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Nutriló

Channel

Nutriló

@nutriloca

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

2,686subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001505100830
TypeChannel
Username@nutriloca
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 15 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nutriloca

Growth

2,6862,7372,711.57 August 2026 — 2,737 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,722 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,715 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,709 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,701 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,692 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,686 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,678–2,745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 18:172,686-6
24 Aug 2026, 11:392,692-9
20 Aug 2026, 21:552,701-8
18 Aug 2026, 04:142,709-6
15 Aug 2026, 01:542,715-7
11 Aug 2026, 17:112,722-13
8 Aug 2026, 20:022,735-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:462,737first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,113 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
80272.1%
👍22520.2%
🔥665.93%
😁131.17%
🎉70.629%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2022 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Feb 2026, 17:29 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

1 Oct 2022, 11:58 UTC≈8,530 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Y para quien quiera leer más un poco de la historia del mundo veg contada por determinadas personas (supremacía blanca check) https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/100/suppl_1/496S/4576707?login=false

49👍13🎉2

1 Oct 2022, 11:54 UTC≈8,210 views103 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bueeeen día! Hoy es el día del vegetarianismo a nivel mundial. Y si bien no soy fan de los día de tal cosa, a veces resultan importantes como enganche para hablar de otras cositas jajaja. Así que quizás es un mes (justo culmina o quizás empieza con el 1ro de noviembre que es el día del veganismo) para tomarlo como invitación a repensar todos nuestros hábitos de consumo, incluido el alimentario. Les dejo un pequeño es

87👍11🎉5

26 Sept 2022, 21:01 UTC≈8,330 views84 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bueno, ahora si. Espero que les sirva. Reitero: tarea: leer de falacias argumentativa! En redes sociales ABUNDAN. Jaja. Les tkm. Nutriló ❤️

67👍13🔥4

26 Sept 2022, 21:01 UTC≈7,650 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Dialnet-LaFalaciaDelPuntoMedioEnElDebatePublico-7434667.pdf

34👍1

26 Sept 2022, 20:59 UTC≈5,230 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A modo de discusión/conclusión: Estar posicionados no necesariamente implica ser extremista, inflexible o fundamentalista y si así lo fuera, ¿Quién define los extremos?. Estar posicionados es dar cuenta desde qué lugar hablamos, desde qué marco teórico operamos y por sobre todas las cosas desde dónde vemos la realidad. Ni más ni menos. En los tiempos que corren, "moderación" no es solo una falacia argumentativa sino

33👍8🔥6

26 Sept 2022, 20:59 UTC≈4,400 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Entonces, en este sentido aludir al punto medio es como decir la verdad que todo el mundo considera evidente: que es BUENO ser alguien moderado, alejarse del extremismo y sostener lo que dicta el sentido común de la mayoría de la gente.

👍8

26 Sept 2022, 20:59 UTC≈4,390 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(*) Una "falacia argumentativa" es una afirmación que parece ser valida pero no lo es. Existen muchos tipos de falacias y a mi modo de entender, resulta imprescindibles conocerlas para no incurrir en alguna de ellas cuando estamos o nos están argumentando algo en algún debate/discusión. La falacia ad hominem es de las mas conocidas. pero hay muchas (TAREA: LEER SOBRE FALACIAS). La cual consiste en introducir alguna c

20👍6

26 Sept 2022, 20:59 UTC≈4,060 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Y aunque el punto medio produce una muy buena impresión, principalmente en el debate publico, situarse aquí no garantiza ni por joda estar del lado de la justicia ehh jajaaj

🔥9👍6

26 Sept 2022, 20:59 UTC≈4,110 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

El punto medio puede resultar ser un lugar común, que puede establecerse arbitrariamente para JUSTIFICAR CUALQUIER POSICION y en algunos casos constituye una falacia argumentativa (*). No es un evento meramente matemático, es decir que sabemos que el 3 esta entre el 2 y el 4, pero el asunto es sobrevalorar el 3 argumentando que 2 y 4 son extremos y conferirles a estos dos números (muy arbitrariamente) cualidades nega

20👍4

26 Sept 2022, 20:59 UTC≈4,260 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Según Aranguez Sanchez (2010) -les dejo articulo adjunto- "para Aristóteles la virtud se encuentra en el punto medio entre dos extremos, que son dos vicios: uno por exceso y el otro por defecto". El punto medio representado como algo justo y hoy en día como "moderación". Sin embargo, la teoría del punto medio es un tópico que puede constituir una falacia argumentativa.

16👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nutriloca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nutriló” (@nutriloca), 2,686 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nutriloca.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.