Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
4,100 average views per post against 2,467 subscribers — an engagement rate of 166.4%. Across the 54,164 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 10.5% and 35.6%, with a median of 20.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
18 of 18 published in the window (9 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
73,870
Mature posts only
186.7% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,460–2,468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:38
2,467
+4
9 Aug 2026, 20:21
2,463
+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:08
2,461
no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:02
2,461
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
166.4%
avg views ÷ 2,467 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,100
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.076%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
18 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
73,870
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
27m 45s
Average length
2m 31s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7
20.6%
🤬
6
17.6%
😱
5
14.7%
👍
4
11.8%
🔥
3
8.82%
🙈
3
8.82%
🤯
2
5.88%
🦄
2
5.88%
🏆
1
2.94%
😭
1
2.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Верховный суд признал незаконным лишение водительских прав в ситуации, когда личность водителя установили только с его собственных слов.
Поводов для рассмотрения этого вопроса стала ситуация с новосибирцем Дмитрием Шелухиным. Все началось с того, что инспекторы остановили Toyota, мужчина за рулем был явно пьян, никаких документов не предъявил, но назвался владельцем машины — Дмитрием Шелухиным. Полицейские сверили е…
Многие водители недолюбливают велосипедистов — носятся они как угорелые где попало, выскакивают на дорогу в самых неожиданных местах и вообще всячески попирают ПДД и нормы поведения. А случись что, отвечать перед законом придется водителю, который управляет источником повышенной опасности.
Почему так происходит и можно ли избежать беды? Об этом смотрите в нашем видео.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
В Омске водитель «Лады» сбил семь человек, которые ждали зеленый свет на островке безопасности.
За рулем отечественной легковушки находился 64-летний мужчина. По предварительным данным, ему стало плохо за рулем, и он не справился с управлением.
Пострадавших с различными травмами госпитализировали. В больницу увезли и водителя «Гранты».
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
В Дагестане на перекрестке даже на главной дороге преимущество нужно брать самому и уверенно, иначе можно долго прождать, когда тебя пропустят.
Махачкалинцы, например, говорят: кто привык ездить в столице республики уверенно, в других городах теряются, ведь там не действуют «дагестанские ПДД». А если ездить в Дагестане по федеральным правилам — ДТП не избежать.
Разбирались в особенностях езды по дорогам республики,…
«Газпром нефть» сняла ограничения на продажу топлива в 13 регионах России.
Это Москва, Подмосковье, Петербург, Ленобласть, а также Омская, Ярославская, Нижегородская, Владимирская, Вологодская и Кемеровская области, Краснодарский край, Чувашия и Татарстан.
Теперь автовладельцы могут покупать и заливать топливо в любом объеме в бак машины или в канистру.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
🔞В Петербурге водитель «Ауди» жестко сбил ехавшего на красный свет велосипедиста — после удара молодой человек подлетел в воздух и приземлился на машину, разбив лобовое стекло и сильно помяв крышу.
Пострадавшего с тяжелыми травмами увезли в больницу.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
Хитрые продавцы подержанных авто научились мастерски использовать физиологию человека в своих целях. Например, один из самых сильных психологических механизмов принятия решения — эффект дефицита.
Покупателя накручивают фразами «только сегодня, только сейчас, завтра уже не будет» и у него включается древняя система реагирования на упущенную возможность. В итоге человек готов подписать что угодно, лишь бы забрать жела…
Два человека погибли и шесть пострадали в ДТП с микроавтобусом в Ахтубинском районе Астраханской области.
Авария произошла ночью на 131-м километре дороги Волгоград — Астрахань. Предварительно, легковушка выехала на встречку и врезалась в микроавтобус.
Оба водителя скончались. Шестеро пассажиров, среди которых четверо детей, находятся в больнице.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
Из-за взрыва в ресторане в центре Москвы перекрыли часть улиц.
Временно закрыто движение на:
▪️съезде с внешней стороны Садового кольца на Баррикадную улицу;
▪️съезде с внешней стороны Садового кольца в Кудринский переулок;
▪️съезде с Конюшковской улицы на Баррикадную улицу в сторону Садового кольца;
▪️съезде с Конюшковской улицы в Малый Конюшковский переулок.
🟩 Подписаться на НТВ | МАКС
Два трамвая столкнулись лоб в лоб в Улан-Удэ. Пострадали вoдитeль и дeвять пaccaжиpoв, в тoм чиcлe двoe дeтeй.
Трамваи ехали по одному маршруту. Причиной столкновения стал тexничecкий cбoй в paбoтe cтpeлoчнoгo пepeвoдa нa пyтяx.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
⛔️Проезд по Садовому кольцу и ряду прилегающих улиц перекроют сегодня из-за проведения велогонки и велофестиваля.
Ограничения начнут действовать с 15:00.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
Один водитель выполняет поворот налево, не убедившись по зеркалам, что нет помехи, другой обгоняет по встречке с явным превышением скорости. Итог — ДТП со смертью пешехода.
Какое нарушение опаснее и кто виноват в аварии? Узнали у адвоката.
🟢 Подписаться на НТВ.Авто | 🟢 НТВ.Авто в МАКС
😱3🤯2❤1😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ntvauto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 765,307 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ntvauto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ntvnews named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 8 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НТВ.Авто 🟢” (@ntvauto), 2,467 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ntvauto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.