Channel
@nooschool_brain
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,079subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001977471507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nooschool_brain |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nooschool_brain |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 1,079 | -1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 1,080 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 1,082 | +1 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 1,081 | -1 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:21 | 1,082 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 1,084 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 1,086 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 1,087 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:47 | 1,087 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
65 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 32.3% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 27.7% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 23.1% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 16.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Куда уходит тренировка мозга, если каждый день только кроссворды и судоку? Мы привыкли думать: решаю кроссворд - значит, тренирую мозг. Но это как ходить каждый день на беговой дорожке и считать, что вы в отличной физической форме. Тренируетесь? Да. Всесторонне? Нет. Мозгу, как и телу, нужна разная нагрузка: на память, на внимание, на скорость обработки информации, на переключение между полушариями, на координаци…
🔥4❤2
Куда исчезает ваш год? Мы привыкли считать деньги, планировать покупки, считать калории. Но почти никогда не считаем главное - своё время. Сколько часов в году мы спим? Работаем? Стоим в пробках? Листаем телефон? Выполняем чужие планы и «обязательства»? Я начала считать. И цифры получаются очень отрезвляющие. Потому что время очень важный ресур - это и есть наша жизнь Присоединяйтесь, если хотите перестать жить…
❤4
Молодость мозга с Алёной Ладной pinned a video
Молодость мозга с Алёной Ладной pinned «То, какой будет наша жизнь через 10, 20 или 30 лет, во многом определяется тем, что мы делаем сегодня Если вас не устраивает ваша жизнь, то недостаточно просто хотеть перемен. Нужно уже сейчас принимать решения и совершать действия, которые приведут вас к…»
🎓 А что происходит после курса «Педагог по развитию мозга»? Мы спросили об этом у тех, кто уже прошёл обучение. Задавали им самые популярные вопросы о курсе: 👉🏻 сложно ли было учиться? 👉🏻 где потом применять знания? 👉🏻 получается ли работать педагогом после обучения? 👉🏻 сколько можно зарабатывать? 👉🏻 и главное, действительно ли курс помогает начать новую профессиональную деятельность? Сегодня своей историей делится…
🔥1
Это простое упражнение тренирует дивергентное мышление - способность находить несколько вариантов решения вместо того, чтобы застревать на одном😉 А теперь напишите в комментариях, ваши 5 способов 👇
❤🔥2
Вчера мы с вами говорили о 6 когнитивных функциях, которыми мы пользуемся каждый день, не замечая этого: Внимание. Память. Мышление. Восприятие. Исполнительные функции. Скорость обработки информации. Они влияют на то, как мы учимся, работаем, принимаем решения, общаемся, справляемся с повседневными задачами и адаптируемся к изменениям 🔹 Мышление - умею ли я задавать правильные вопросы, могу ли спокойно реагировать …
6 когнитивных функций, которыми мы пользуемся каждый день Вы используете эти функции постоянно, просто никогда не смотрели на них, как на систему👇 1. Внимание, когда вы удерживаете фокус на задаче 2. Память, когда сохраняете и извлекаете информацию 3. Мышление, когда анализируете, сравниваете и принимаете решения 4. Восприятие, когда мозг интерпретирует поступающую информацию 5. Исполнительные функции, когда пл…
❤3
3️⃣ Бывает ли, что вы реагируете быстрее, чем успеваете подумать (резкое слово, импульсивная покупка, машинальное действие)?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2️⃣ Трудно ли вам довести одно дело до конца, не отвлекаясь на другое?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1️⃣ Часто ли вы теряете нить разговора или забываете, что хотели сказать?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👇👇👇
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nooschool_brain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
3️⃣ Бывает ли, что вы реагируете быстрее, чем успеваете подумать (резкое слово, импульсивная покупка, машинальное действие)?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2️⃣ Трудно ли вам довести одно дело до конца, не отвлекаясь на другое?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1️⃣ Часто ли вы теряете нить разговора или забываете, что хотели сказать?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 7 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Молодость мозга с Алёной Ладной” (@nooschool_brain), 1,079 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nooschool_brain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.