Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Никитствование

Channel

Никитствование

@nikitstvovanie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,368subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001249051402
TypeChannel
Username@nikitstvovanie
Created23 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nikitstvovanie

Growth

3,3563,3683,3627 August 2026 — 3,356 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,356 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,362 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,368 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,364 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,367 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,368 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,354–3,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 04:353,368+1
22 Aug 2026, 17:583,367+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:133,364-4
13 Aug 2026, 12:073,368+6
10 Aug 2026, 06:373,362+5
7 Aug 2026, 16:353,357+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:183,356no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:083,356first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 3,368 subscribers
Avg views / post
976
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (21 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,831
Reactions total284
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

681 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520422176816786657119728.9%
custom 523550784755022156619428.5%
custom 52267912586676240948812.9%
custom 5217608395250485583568.22%
custom 5460677478047554090466.75%
🤣365.29%
🗿294.26%
custom 5224222400073179308162.35%
custom 5244514806286792534152.20%
custom 522660337961822757420.294%
custom 523104840877658229420.294%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 681reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nikitstvovanie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC418 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возвращаемся домой к Ницше https://www.twitch.tv/ndobryakov Поблагодарить стримера Записи стримов

custom 52355078475502215667

6 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC496 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Через 45 минут начнём

custom 52176083952504855839custom 52042217681678665712custom 52355078475502215662

5 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC701 views44 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

На прошлой неделе начал работу закрытый философский клуб «Чтойность». Продуктивно обсудили «Похвалу глупости» Эразма, уже на следующей неделе — Хайдеггер + Делез. Вступить

custom 521760839525048558319custom 520422176816786657112custom 52355078475502215667custom 52267912586676240945🗿1

5 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC706 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Завтра в 20:00 мск возвращаемся к чтению Ницше на твиче 🤿

custom 523550784755022156611custom 52267912586676240944🗿3custom 52310484087765822942custom 52176083952504855831

3 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,170 views97 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Два раза сходил на «Одиссею» и оба раза рыдал. Тяжелое, очень тяжелое, но очистительное воздействие.

custom 520422176816786657168custom 522679125866762409412custom 522422240007317930810custom 54606774780475540905custom 52266033796182275742

30 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,570 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На этой неделе Ницше в отпуске — а мы с ним🗿 Надеюсь с августа вернемся к нашему темпу 🤗

custom 546067747804755409032custom 52042217681678665716🗿1custom 52176083952504855831

29 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,770 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мой дорогой и любимый друг Ваня, вместе с которым мы прошли огонь, воду и философский факультет, поднимает швейное дело в России. Сейчас ему требуется помощь — тонна вещей сгорела на складах. Передаю ему слово: Привет, очень нужна ваша помощь и репост! У нас швейный цех и магазин на WB. Как вы знаете, на той неделе сгорело несколько складов, на них было много нашего товара, стоимость которого никто не собирается воз

custom 520422176816786657149custom 54606774780475540909custom 52355078475502215664

27 Jul 2026, 20:13 UTC≈1,450 views108 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Как вы могли заметить, я собираю все скажем так странные названия. - никитствование - чтойность А в «Похвале глупости» Эразм напомнил мне, как Аристофан называл школу Сократа, а именно — размышляльня. Или мыслильня. Чувствуете, да. Ну мое. Ну как влитое. Видит бог, я сделаю сайд-проект с таким названием.

custom 522679125866762409467custom 520422176816786657118🤣17custom 52176083952504855836

24 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC≈1,820 views117 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Когда буду готов, я напишу великий трактат о философии миньонов, произнесу в пустоте своего кабинета пафосную фразу на банановом языке и уйду. Уйду навсегда. 🍌

custom 523550784755022156671🗿20custom 521760839525048558317🤣9

24 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC≈1,520 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Весь мир: идет на Одиссею Никита: идет на новых миньонов И знаете КАК ЖЕ Я ОБОЖАЮ МИНЬОНОВ PS. Мультик отличный. После второй части гадкого я было все очень плохо, а это, внезапно, ооооочень смешно.

custom 523550784755022156644🤣10custom 52242224000731793086

23 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,320 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Полтора часа прошло https://www.twitch.tv/ndobryakov

custom 52042217681678665713custom 52355078475502215662

23 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,370 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Практика медленного чтения Ницше — через полтора часа

custom 520422176816786657115custom 52445148062867925344custom 52355078475502215662

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @nikitstvovanie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 909,763 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Никитствование” (@nikitstvovanie), 3,368 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nikitstvovanie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.