Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Nicki.li

@nickilibert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,546subscribers

-33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509092967
TypeChannel
Username@nickilibert
DescriptionПо вопросам сотрудничества и предложениям обращайтесь к админу •админ~> https://t.me/nicki2112 •Делаем книжный мир ЛУЧШЕ✨
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nickilibert

Growth

6,5466,5806,5636 August 2026 — 6,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,580 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,546 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,541–6,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:036,546-34
7 Aug 2026, 16:346,580+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:486,579first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.7%
avg views ÷ 6,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,840
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held22 (20 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total84,490
Reactions total5,256
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,690
Videos
121
Links
107

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,256 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53435772992560919672,08139.6%
custom 534608948146209528594518.0%
custom 522882809107318067082915.8%
custom 542497283509532974255510.6%
custom 52063018766639034674819.15%
custom 53120930414927784402234.24%
custom 54047611742668839221422.70%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,256reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nickilibert. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,870 views186 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Завтра …🌚

custom 5404761174266883922111custom 534357729925609196753custom 542497283509532974222

9 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈2,680 views269 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ни на что не намекаю…🌚

custom 5228828091073180670163custom 542497283509532974249custom 531209304149277844034custom 534608948146209528513custom 534357729925609196710

7 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈3,270 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 534608948146209528549

7 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈2,840 views227 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @yacherdakPhoto

🎬 Amazon экранизирует цикл книг Холли Блэк «Воздушный народ». #экранизации #холлиблэк #воздушныйнародец 💙 чердак с историями в ВК

custom 5228828091073180670142custom 534357729925609196749custom 534608948146209528524custom 53120930414927784406custom 54249728350953297426

3 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC≈3,990 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Обновление по «Разрушь Меня»: мы получили книги, и на данный момент они находятся на стадии упаковки. Это дело небыстрое, помните об этом. Также напоминаю, что если вам не хочется ждать, то всегда можно забрать книгу самовывозом из г. Химки. Скоро начнутся первые рассылки Не забывайте проверять личные кабинеты СДЭКа Для самовывоза свяжитесь с админом в описании канала

custom 5343577299256091967132custom 520630187666390346738custom 542497283509532974217

3 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈3,870 views285 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мечта детства наконец-то у меня😭 Я счастлив Осталось только мини книгу с другими медальонами нарыть 🕺

custom 5228828091073180670177custom 534608948146209528566custom 534357729925609196740custom 54249728350953297422

2 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈3,840 views337 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

А это всё то, что вам может попасться с первой книгой.🌚 Помните, что в каждом наборе есть редкий брелок. (В данном наборе это Риз) Собрав 3 редких, вы получите уникальный приз~ Позже гачи можно будет докупать✨

custom 5343577299256091967217custom 534608948146209528569custom 522882809107318067041custom 54047611742668839224custom 52063018766639034673custom 53120930414927784403

1 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC≈3,650 views262 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Одни из будущих гача брелков для первого кшира~✨

custom 5346089481462095285174custom 531209304149277844041custom 534357729925609196741custom 54249728350953297426

31 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC≈4,170 views476 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ни одна порнушная сцена кшира не сравнится со сценой во Дворе Кошмаров….🥵

custom 5343577299256091967321custom 520630187666390346795custom 531209304149277844043custom 53460894814620952859custom 54249728350953297428

30 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈3,970 views211 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Мини Ризанды приехали🌚

custom 5343577299256091967139custom 534608948146209528551custom 531209304149277844021

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈4,240 views493 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

У нас тут кое какие визуальные пробнички 🌚

custom 5206301876663903467284custom 5346089481462095285122custom 522882809107318067061custom 534357729925609196713custom 54047611742668839228custom 53120930414927784405

29 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,880 views162 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ща вам такую имбу покажу🌚

custom 534608948146209528599custom 520630187666390346730custom 534357729925609196718custom 540476117426688392210custom 54249728350953297425

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @nickilibert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,440 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Nicki.li” (@nickilibert), 6,546 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nickilibert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.