Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Netlas.io

@netlas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,257subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001444335477
TypeChannel
Username@netlas
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/netlas

Growth

2,2512,2572,2546 August 2026 — 2,252 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,252 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,252 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,257 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,250–2,258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 04:372,257+5
9 Aug 2026, 09:112,252+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:212,251-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:022,252no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:502,252first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 2,257 subscribers
Avg views / post
391
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (2 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total5,087
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8245.6%
6133.9%
👍2111.7%
👾126.67%
🕊21.11%
😱21.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC133 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-64638: Pre-auth reflected XSS in WordPress, 8.9 rating ‍🔥 WordPress is vulnerable to a pre-auth reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) on the login screen, which can be escalated to RCE. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/SjACB 👉 Dork: tag.name:"wordpress" Vendor's advisory: https://github.com/WordPress/wordpress-develop/security/advisories/GHSA-52p2-r8wf-jcrf

🔥21

6 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC182 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🤖 Desktop AI Supercomputers and Automated Cyberattacks AI supercomputers now fit on a desk. Combine them with uncensored open models and autonomous agents, and cyberattacks become cheaper, faster, and far easier to scale. ✔ Why local AI changes the economics of offensive operations ✔ How model guardrails can be removed or bypassed ✔ How agents automate reconnaissance, exploitation, and retries ✔ Why defenders must

4🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC233 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-15307: Server-side file-write and request forgery via spatial lookups in Django, 8.8 rating ‍🔥 Recently disclosed Django vulnerability allows an attacker to write a file to disk (in some cases enabling remote code execution) or issue a network request as the Django process user. This flaw is reachable by staff users with view permissions on any registered model containing a spatial field. Search at Netlas.

2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC312 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-16347: Possible brute-force attack in Mikrotik RouterOS, 8.8 rating ‍🔥 MikroTik RouterOS contains a weakness in its API authentication handling that allows attackers to brute-force logins for unauthorized system access. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/mMq91 👉 Dork: http.favicon.hash_sha256:6e08f1f90e778da22f07537040dfcdab9c29ac443d8386ba5be71fcbc418ff47 OR http.title:"RouterOS" OR http.body:"img

🔥31

30 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC446 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-56846, CVE-2026-56848 & CVE-2026-58043 and other: 3 high-severity and 8 medium or low vulnerabilities in Node.js ‍🔥 Recently disclosed vulnerabilities in Node.js touch HTTP/2, the Permission Model, and several core modules. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/AAg1f 👉 Dork: tag.name:"node_js" Vendor's advisory: https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/july-2026-security-releases

4🔥4👍2

29 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC412 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Command injection in Mittel MiCollab, no CVE assigned yet, 9.8 rating ‍🔥 A command injection vulnerability has been discovered in the AWV component of Mitel MiCollab. A successful exploit of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands and potentially gain control of the system. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/t8Tk9 👉 Dork: tag.name:"micollab" Vendor's advisory: https://www.m

3🔥3🕊2

28 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC390 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-16812: OS Command injection in VeloCloud Orchestrator, 10.0 rating ‍🔥 A new vulnerability in Arista VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker run OS commands on the VCO host. A compromise can also expose managed devices. This vulnerability is already being actively exploited in the wild! Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/PkM4n 👉 Dork: http.body:"single-spa-application:

4🔥4

27 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC521 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-61511: Pre-auth RCE vulnerability in vBulletin, 9.3 rating 🔥 The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary PHP code as the web server, which can mean full site takeover. PoC is now available! Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/c7BPf 👉 Dork: tag.name:"vbulletin" Read more: https://ssd-disclosure.com/vbulletin-runtime-template-runmaths-preauth-rce/

🔥6👍42

23 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC527 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

High-severity LPE in Exim, no CVE assigned yet 🤷‍ A new vulnerability in Exim allows a local attacker to read files outside the mail spool. This could lead to privilege escalation. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/qEnbs 👉 Dork: tag.name:"exim" Vendor's advisory: https://www.exim.org/static/doc/security/EXIM-Security-2026-06-22.1/EXIM-Security-2026-06-22.1.txt

🔥65😱2👍1

22 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC473 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-60291, CVE-2026-60292, CVE-2026-60294 and other: A lot of vulnerabilities in Oracle Weblogic Server, 9.8 rating 🔥 Recently disclosed easily exploitable vulnerabilities in Oracle Weblogic Server allow unauthenticated attacker to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/NdCqq 👉 Dork: tag.name:"weblogic" Vendor's advisory: https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026

🔥64👍3

21 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC451 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

HollowByte: DoS vulnerability in OpenSSL, no CVE assigned yet 🤷‍ By sending a malicious payload of just 11 bytes, a remote, unauthenticated attacker can freeze server memory and to crush a host. Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/be55E 👉 Dork: tag.name:"openssl" Read more: https://sec.okta.com/articles/2026/06/openssl-hollowbtye-a-dos-hiding-in-11-bytes/

🔥42👍1

20 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC474 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-63030: Pre-Auth RCE in WordPress Core, 9.8 rating 🔥 Recently disclosed WordPress pre authentication RCE vulnerability can be exploited by an anonymous user in a stock install of WordPress with no plugins. PoC exists! Search at Netlas.io: 👉 Link: https://nt.ls/Yvd0s 👉 Dork: tag.name:"wordpress" Read more: https://slcyber.io/research-center/wp2shell-pre-authentication-rce-in-wordpress-core

🔥43👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @netlas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 766,457 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Netlas.io” (@netlas), 2,257 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/netlas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.