Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for НЕ СПАЛ НЕДЕЛЮ

Channel

НЕ СПАЛ НЕДЕЛЮ

@nespalnedely

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

1,773subscribers

+56 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002045469411
TypeChannel
Username@nespalnedely
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nespalnedely

Growth

1,7161,7791,747.57 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,717 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,716 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,723 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,737 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,728 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,721 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,734 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,779 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,773 subscribers1,7737 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,707–1,788 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 05:421,773-6
27 Aug 2026, 07:081,779+45
24 Aug 2026, 00:441,734+13
20 Aug 2026, 11:331,721-7
17 Aug 2026, 12:521,728-9
14 Aug 2026, 06:361,737+14
10 Aug 2026, 22:511,723+7
8 Aug 2026, 02:581,716-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:031,717no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:181,717first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 1,773 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total856
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8657.0%
💩2617.2%
🔥2214.6%
👍53.31%
💯53.31%
👏31.99%
👎21.32%
🗿10.662%
😎10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nespalnedely. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC233 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ало новый видос на канале! Многие просили и я это сделал!!!!! https://youtu.be/G9EroGZrHUE?is=rBXLviqMVq8pe9Rf

🔥4💩2👎1

3 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC310 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ебнуло так ебнуло 🫡

4👍2

3 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC313 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Был на этих выходных на глобальной битве. В этом году - ивент кринж вонючего бомжа….. Создатели проекта сделали всё для того чтобы выиграли США 🇺🇸, нам банили типов, ремуволи фобки, пинг на сервере достигал 16000 тысяч, а у америкосов был в этот момент 200) получение ядерной бомбы сделали таким чтобы они точно была у америкосов… но даже находясь в полной жопе, мы не сдались и сделали красиво… И КСАТИ у меня была с

25 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC547 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Плыву перехватывать ОИЛ РИГ на чиле на расслабоне, так как знаю что Влад сделает всё сам, а я просто буду это снимать и чилить А на втором фото, надел СЕТ для перехвата

6🔥4😎1

25 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC508 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не понимаю Вы чилеры или не чилеры???? Да-♥️ Я потный растер 💩

21💩8

24 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC465 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не могу упускать чистый день для дропа, поэтому новый ролик уже на канале!!! Попрошу максимальную поддержку « лайки и комментарии» ПАРАЗИТЫ! ВЗЯЛИ В ПЛЕН ГЛАВУ КЛАНА И В НАС ЗАПУСТИЛИ 100 МЛРС В РАСТ / RUST https://youtu.be/PSx86LVysok

4

24 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC446 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Без лишних слов. Максим Глутон выпустил угарный видос, так ещё и я принял там участие. Смотрим, лайки ставим!!!! https://youtu.be/APf35SnhEF4

🔥21

17 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC590 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Все готово Один Пк - для раста Второй Пк - для монтажа «научу девушку будет видосы монтировать мне» Короче надеюсь что видосов будет больше с двумя пк, но это не точно ♥️

11👏2

16 Jul 2026, 16:35 UTC580 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Короче подготавливаем новое рабочее место на 2 пк. Завтра придут столы общей длинной 2 метра 20 см. Сегодня был куплен монитор 34 диагонали для монтажа. Короче работаем

10

15 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC521 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПРИЁМ ТОВАРИЩИ!!! я почти закончил с монтажём ролика думаю осталось 3-4 дня, решил сделать не большой перерыв и глянуть ролик коллеги по цеху katari . РОЛИК РЕАЛЬНАЯ ИМБА! ИДЕЯ ПРОСТО ТОПЧИК! ПОДДЕРЖИТЕ АВТОРА ПОСТАВЬТЕ ЛАЙК И НАПИШИТЕ КОММЕНТАРИЙ! https://youtu.be/vxjf1D_7ECc https://youtu.be/vxjf1D_7ECc https://youtu.be/vxjf1D_7ECc

🔥4

13 Jul 2026, 23:25 UTC517 views5 reactions25 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сижу новый ролик монтирую на новой пэкарне.. это такой топчик. Все летает, я могу и монтировать и в раст играть и всё одновременно. Ну старый компудактор продавать не буду так же пойдет в дело, для более быстрого монтажа и если что на камерах сидеть когда нас будут рейдить чтоб со стороны снимать

🔥5

12 Jul 2026, 20:57 UTC636 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера при записи нового ролика я перезаходил в рис раз наверное 10 потому что спустя час игры, фпс падал до 30-40 и играть было не реально… Записав ролик я начал думать как решить эту проблему. Гуглил смотрел всякие видосики где челы тупо врубают графику 🥔 (картошка) и говорят вот это хороший способ, используют разные программы после которых они остаются без стим аккаунта и прочих меседжеров🦖 Мне все эти способы не

💯31👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @nespalnedely. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“НЕ СПАЛ НЕДЕЛЮ” (@nespalnedely), 1,773 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nespalnedely.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.