Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for alter ego

Channel

alter ego

@ncitmaerk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001208168357
TypeChannel
Username@ncitmaerk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 26 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/ncitmaerk

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

12 Nov 2021, 10:30 UTC76 viewsread 27 August 2026

ssup moots, this is Jaspér speaking. due to my personal reasons, i decided to put this channel & my account into inactive for while i'll brb.

11 Oct 2021, 13:15 UTC145 viewsread 27 August 2026

★☆︎. Wa$$up 🅹aspér 🅼arko $mathyrta in here 👋🏻 u can call me Yeri's boyfriend 😮‍💨 I use 🄼🄰🅁🄺 🄻🄴🄴 🐯 as a face claim. She handsome like me 😯 and a Rapper 🎙🤘🏻 in NCT 127, NCT DREAM, and NCT U under the auspices of SM Entertainment. 𝓑orn August 2,1999

11 Oct 2021, 13:13 UTC107 viewsread 27 August 2026

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝗗𝗜𝗦𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗥 𝐃ue to @Telegram's new privacy policy, I would like to emphasize that my channel or personal account is created only for roleplaying Ⓟerpose, There's nothing to do whit the real MaRk Lee??! All photos and videos are not my pribadi property it can be form any platforms. ㅤMore than pleased, converge with you, whomever stumbled upon this humbly cyber channel of him. Knownable as 🅹aspér 🅼ark

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ncitmaerk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2021, 09:32 UTCAnonymous Poll112 voters

wdyt about me?

  1. talkative and friendly, a crackhead, over acting, being fun & noisy 24/7, comfort person, humoris38%
  2. soft, cutie pie, lovely person, super kind & noisy, easy to interact, one of my fav moots27%
  3. barks, might bite you, lowkey intimidating but humble, shy to interact, cool/hot/swag vibes18%
  4. want to be closer, pretty, friendly and kind, noisy, freaky, positive vibes, can heal your day18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2021, 12:04 UTCAnonymous Poll290 voters

select one

  1. 🛼21%
  2. 🛹27%
  3. 🍚30%
  4. 🎟6%
  5. 🧸15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2021 to 12 November 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“alter ego” (@ncitmaerk). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ncitmaerk.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.