7 measurements spanning 13 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,404–1,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 17:42
1,405
-3
16 Aug 2026, 21:33
1,408
-2
13 Aug 2026, 08:47
1,410
-3
10 Aug 2026, 11:36
1,413
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:15
1,414
+1
6 Aug 2026, 11:47
1,413
no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:00
1,413
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
186 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
186
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 25 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام عزیزم
من یه جذب خیلی قشنگ داشتم ولی چون روزی نبود که شما باشین پیام ندادم
حدود ده روز پیش رابطم به کات رسید جوری که طرفم نمیخواست باهام حرف بزنه گفت حتی نمیخوام یه لحظه ببینمت خیلی عصبی بود
هیچ جوری نتونستم رابطه رو درست کنم هرکاری میکردم بدتر میشد
من کلاس رو از قبل داشتم اما برا این رابطم شروع نکرده بودم
قبل شروع کلاس فقط پاکسازی کردم بعدش خودش بهم یه پیام کوتاه داد ولی حرف نزد
من شروع کردم از قدم اول پاکسازی…
🌸 #نتیجه #جذب_ازدواج_موفق #شخص_خاص از دوره بینظیر #جذب_عشق😍❤️
🌸 با شخص خاصم ازدواج کردم
🌸 #ثبت_نام 👇
🌸 @SabtteNam28
✅ همراه با #پشتیبانی_سوالات در طی دوره
❤️ #نتیجه ی دوست عزیزمون از دوره ی جذب عشق و جذب همسر الهی
♥️ فقط چند روزه دارم دوره رو انجام میدم و نامزدم .....
❤9
Signed ساناز
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @natayejeshgh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نتایج جذب عشق ( ساناز اسبقی)” (@natayejeshgh), 1,405 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natayejeshgh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
