Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Настя Ивлева

Channel

Настя Ивлева

@nastivleva

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

4,465subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001931643849
TypeChannel
Username@nastivleva
Created12 March 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/nastivleva

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,4654,5974,5317 August 2026 — 4,597 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,586 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,575 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,567 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,557 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,548 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,542 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,536 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,534 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,534 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,525 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,513 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,502 subscribers30 September 2026 — 4,475 subscribers6 October 2026 — 4,465 subscribers7 August 20266 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 60 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,445–4,617 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 23:594,465-10
30 Sept 2026, 09:574,475-27
15 Sept 2026, 18:374,502-11
11 Sept 2026, 16:154,513-12
7 Sept 2026, 00:584,525-9
3 Sept 2026, 12:144,534no change
2 Sept 2026, 08:144,534-2
30 Aug 2026, 12:354,536-6
27 Aug 2026, 22:474,542-6
24 Aug 2026, 22:164,548-9
21 Aug 2026, 01:224,557-10
18 Aug 2026, 08:034,567-8
15 Aug 2026, 01:374,575-11
11 Aug 2026, 07:354,586-11
7 Aug 2026, 12:214,597first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя Ивлева” (@nastivleva), 4,465 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nastivleva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.