Channel
@nan6986
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,185subscribers
+25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002086391099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nan6986 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nan6986 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 1,185 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 1,173 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 1,161 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1,160 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (20 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 909 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
上次約完纖細型舞蹈生後 這次來約大奶豐滿型可愛小妹妹！ #感謝信任 —————— 🎓 歐蕾 160-E-43-22歲 🎓 歐蕾更多客評點此處 清純高學歷大奶尤物，身材纖修長 曲線很有存在感明顯反差，視覺上特別吸引人。高智背景 談吐有內容、有邏輯，聊天不只是表面互動，能聊生活也能聊想法，溫柔俏皮 清新＋反差感 外表無害、內在有層次 #高雄客評 #高雄可約
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
勇敢的人先享受正妹~ 第一次外約找到我這邊 可以放心的把下半身和下半生交給我了😂 見到妹妹後立馬拿下兩節~ 跟小婭介紹的無誤 甚至更好看！ 非常開心~~ 完美的初次體驗！ ————— ⭐ 伊納 168-C-48-21歲 ⭐ 伊納 更多客評點此處 美腿高顏藝術生 修長纖細美腿清新耐看的輕盈與感。溫柔親切，健談好聊，細心、有耐心 女友系陪伴型 #高雄可約 #高雄客評 很好看欸 薇婭是第一間 感覺運氣很好 找對人了 鼓起勇氣是對的 跟介紹的一樣 很開心啊 妹妹很好聊 服務很棒 人又很好看 下次要約肯定再找薇婭 沒道理不回衝 很享受
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
特意從台南來高雄找小婭解鎖正妹~之前在別家踩雷太多次，不是照騙就是服務落差超大，今天跟小婭體驗完後，懸著的心終於放下了！原來真的可以符合需求、服務到位、不用擔心被套路、更不用一直踩雷。 ————— ⭐ 怡依 160-C-43-23歲 ⭐ 怡依更多客評點此處 鄰家清秀氣質的瑜伽老師 白皙溫柔。纖細雙腿線條漂亮 ，溫柔體貼 總是帶著甜甜的笑容，態度細心認真 輕鬆又溫暖的相處體驗 #高雄可約 #高雄客評
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
瑜伽老師三節拿下~ 氣質出眾 仙氣飄飄有沒有？🤩🤩 ————— ⭐ 怡依 160-C-43-23歲 ⭐ 怡依更多客評點此處 鄰家清秀氣質的瑜伽老師 白皙溫柔。纖細雙腿線條漂亮 ，溫柔體貼 總是帶著甜甜的笑容，態度細心認真 輕鬆又溫暖的相處體驗 #高雄可約 #高雄客評
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
超有女友感的辣妹唷~ 喜歡豐滿型 女友感的可以衝！ ————— 🏊♀️ 寶藏 167-D-48-25歲 🏊♀️ 寶藏 更多客評點此處 陽光泳教・蜜桃辣妹 高挑健康身形，胸型飽滿自然、腰線緊實 有在認真運動保養。很有親和力 陽光又性感的反差火辣感，也很懂怎麼照顧對方情緒，整體相處感很輕鬆 #高雄可約 #高雄客評 臉蛋好看，身材中等以上 若是再纖細一些就完美了 但今天這位不錯喔！ 臉蛋服務都很好 身材是剛剛好的勻稱 有大D奶 感覺不止C！ 可以多多推薦 感覺就像是很熟悉自己身體的女朋友一樣 先說優點，人很👌，身材比例，長相，膚色，舒服程度都很OKk，說良心話，這個價格在這裡，還有服務，還有小婭的服務也沒話說，再加上安排的妹妹長相身材都不錯，所以沒有缺點，大實話 妹妹口活和吻技很好，讓我驚豔到了，人照9分 說話很溫柔，且會認真幫忙洗澡，做愛整體過程非常愉悅，做愛反饋非常真實也不會瞎叫，做愛時表現的一種很享受的感覺，越幹越有勁…
❤1
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
兩節拿下溫柔似水的柔情護理師~~ 顏值好又貼心小女友說的就是她了！ —————— 🩺 柔柔 158-C-43-22歲 🩺 柔柔更多客評點此處 可愛溫柔護理師｜甜美療癒系兼具青春感 細心、有耐心，溫柔體貼 愛笑好聊天，讓人忍不住想親近 #高雄可約 #高雄客評
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
連續三天的安排都交給小婭~~ 從溝通到實際見面 每一位都各有特色 水準一直在線！ 過幾天的生日 依然放心交給小婭處理 —————— 🩺 柔柔 158-C-43-22歲 🩺 柔柔更多客評點此處 可愛溫柔護理師｜甜美療癒系兼具青春感 細心、有耐心，溫柔體貼 愛笑好聊天，讓人忍不住想親近 #高雄可約 #高雄客評
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
這種霸道我可以接受😘 我想要多優惠給他 他想讓我少優惠一點 回約美腿藝術生五小時 本人高顏 體型好看 女友感足~ ————— ⭐ 伊納 168-C-48-21歲 ⭐ 伊納 更多客評點此處 美腿高顏藝術生 修長纖細美腿清新耐看的輕盈與感。溫柔親切，健談好聊，細心、有耐心 女友系陪伴型 #高雄可約 #高雄客評
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
可愛的骨感大奶荔枝妹妹~ 短髮甜心就是她啦！ ————— 🍒 荔枝 160-E-40-20歲 🍒 荔枝 更多客評點此處 元氣田徑校隊女孩 運動甜心寶貝 學生短髮甜度爆表，青春活力 可愛討喜。嬌小纖細卻有豐滿E奶 反差十足。平時熱愛運動與戶外活動 朝氣與活力 開朗愛笑 #高雄客評 #高雄可約
Signed 🇹🇼只賣優茶的 薇婭 【八年穩定高檔資源/來者皆是客~】
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @nan6986. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 69,875 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍬薇婭の南部約妹客評回饋區” (@nan6986), 1,185 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nan6986.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.