Guys, how are you? The bot should work for Reddit, X, TikTok, Facebook & VK short video links in most cases. naked.bot π
π101β€34π―8π₯7π1

Channel
@nakedbotch
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
12,399subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001483104300 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nakedbotch |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nakedbotch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 12,399 | -13 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 12,412 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 12,418 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 12,419 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 12,411 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 12,413 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 12,410 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 12,421 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 12,426 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 12,426 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 October 2021 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,828 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 1,249 | 68.3% | |
| β€ | 353 | 19.3% | |
| π₯ | 96 | 5.25% | |
| π― | 66 | 3.61% | |
| π | 64 | 3.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,828reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2021 to 12 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @nakedbotch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 October 2021 to 12 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Guys, how are you? The bot should work for Reddit, X, TikTok, Facebook & VK short video links in most cases. naked.bot π
π101β€34π―8π₯7π1
Hey guys, Twitter finally enforced new free limits for apps, that's why twitter links no longer parsed. As long as I got only one donation for this bot since it was started I don't spend much time making it work. It looks like nobody really needs it. I will try to find a solution though but I don't want to make huge efforts in this situation. Hope you get it. Thanks.
π674β€172π₯32π―31π23
[reddit fix] The bot works with Reddit links again If you have any questions/suggestions please feel free to drop me a message here: @asknaked_bot naked.bot π
π174β€42π₯22π15π―10
[twitter fix] Multiple media handling The bot now supports tweets with arbitrary number of photo/video/gif media. If you have any questions/suggestions please feel free to drop me a message here: @asknaked_bot naked.bot π
π82β€20π5π―3
Invoice, posted without a caption
β€23π17π6
Multi-use invoice. π¬ Donate to naked.bot π
π28β€7π7
As long as Twitter API is going to be paid, there's a chance that some features of the bot will become paid as well or I must take them down. It's funny that Elon's fight for free speech turned out to be a fight for money (in a very dumb way though). Fun fact: donations never work. I got zero from them since the beginning. https://telegra.ph/twitterdev-956f2-02-02 naked.bot π
π34β€10π―4π1
Fun fact: some think that the bot makes deep fake nude images. That's why I regularly receive female images in the support chat. Another fun fact: the bot turned 10 000 users recently. Most of them probably think the same. naked.bot π
π₯32π25β€7π4π―4
[big new feature] Groups & channels The bot now replies to Reddit & Twitter links in groups and channels. For groups: just add the bot as a member (or re-add if it's here already). For channels: add the bot as an administartor and give a posting permissing to it. If the bot detects some suitable link it replies with media content when possible. No other messages posted. If you have any questions/suggestions pleasβ¦
π32β€7π―4
Invoice, posted without a caption
β€9π6
how do you like the naked.bot π so far?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
β€7π2π―2
[facebook] now it's possible to save Facebook videos https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=β¦ https://www.facebook.com/username/videos/β¦/ https://fb.watch/β¦
π2π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nakedbotch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
how do you like the naked.bot π so far?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2021 to 12 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 314,639 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βnaked.bot π channelβ (@nakedbotch), 12,399 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nakedbotch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.