Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

夢雅閣|日本高端總站·私人安排入口

@nai4626

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,337subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003967653031
TypeChannel
Username@nai4626
Description📍東京・大阪資訊整合 📖 頻道導航|最新公告|資源索引 🔗 所有官方入口統一收錄於此 悠奈個人號: @nai881
Created18 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nai4626

Growth

1,3377 Aug 2026, 18:46 — 1,337 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:22 — 1,337 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:467 Aug 2026, 22:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,336–1,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 22:221,337no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:461,337first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.80%
avg views ÷ 1,337 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (18 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total24
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC24 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤩哥哥們看過來~奈奈來整理一下自己的「秘密基地入口」啦 最近有些哥哥問: 「奈奈到底哪個號是真的呀?」 「頻道好多,要看哪一個呀?」 所以我偷偷整理了一份《奈奈官方導航地圖》 以後找我、看資訊,不用像在迷宮探險啦~ 🦋聯絡奈奈🦋⤵️ 主號: @nai881 備用小號: 1️⃣@xia421 2️⃣@xia0712 3️⃣@nai993 小助理⤵️ @tea489 (PS:如果主號忙碌,哥哥可以找備用號喔~) 🚨官方資訊頻道 主頻道:https://t.me/younai301 頻道2:https://t.me/yuluqin1686 English:https://t.me/nai523 🇯🇵日本語:https://t.me/nai489 🐇不同主題的小天地⤵️ 奈の日常:https://t.me/nai852 大阪の妹妹:https://t.me/nai152415 🗼 東京の妹妹:https://t.me/n

1 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC443 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

中文選妹①:https://t.me/younai301 中文選妹②:https://t.me/yuluqin1686 日本語:https://t.me/nai489 English:https://t.me/nai523 奈 の日常:https://t.me/nai852 av:https://t.me/nai88542 總站:https://t.me/nai4626 新手頻道:https://t.me/nai698

31 May 2026, 07:25 UTC55 viewsread 7 August 2026

中文頻道:https://t.me/younai301 https://t.me/yuluqin1686

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @nai4626. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 391,272 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“夢雅閣|日本高端總站·私人安排入口” (@nai4626), 1,337 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nai4626.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.