Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for надо будет посмотреть

Channel

надо будет посмотреть

@nadosmotr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,032subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747987653
TypeChannel
Username@nadosmotr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nadosmotr

Growth

6,0326,0576,044.57 August 2026 — 6,057 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,054 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,047 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,032 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,028–6,061 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 02:356,032-15
11 Aug 2026, 11:136,047-7
8 Aug 2026, 11:486,054-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:036,057first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,592 reactions across 20 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣75028.9%
custom 524467345808373440732612.6%
custom 545653685040134391927810.7%
😢2248.64%
🔥1636.29%
1505.79%
1094.21%
💅833.20%
💯793.05%
🫡783.01%
🙏732.82%
🤡602.31%
🥰532.04%
🎉220.849%
👎180.694%
😍150.579%
💔130.502%
🌭110.424%
😁110.424%
👌90.347%
19 further kinds672.58%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nadosmotr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 February 2026 to 28 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Apr 2026, 09:09 UTC≈2,940 views181 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

в общем, пока отдыхаю от регулярной выкладки контента, у меня освободилось немного времени, чтобы подумать. и могу сказать честно: мне открылась истина. короче, я пришел к выводу, что кинематограф – это низшая ступень в иерархии видов искусств. все эти киношки-хуёшки, блять, Тарантины, Скорсезичи, Куросавы, Тарковские и даже Ноланы – все это безделушки, не представляющие никакой просветительской ценности. из всего о

🤣100custom 52446734580837344074517custom 545653685040134391984🤡4😐2🍌1

17 Apr 2026, 07:04 UTC≈3,680 views90 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣53😢20custom 5244673458083734407103🌭1👀1💯1🤪1

12 Apr 2026, 09:07 UTC≈3,920 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

поздравляю всех православных с праздником Святой Пасхи. хочу напомнить, что Иисус – единственный человек, у которого был сиквел. это ли не круто? Христос Воскресе, друзья!

🙏4919custom 54565368504013439199custom 52446734580837344077🔥1

3 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTC≈4,300 views149 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

АБСОЛЮТ СИНЕМА

custom 54565368504013439197834🔥25❤‍🔥4custom 52446734580837344074🗿3🌭1

1 Apr 2026, 05:31 UTC≈4,070 views213 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Zарегался V MAX❤️🇷🇺 — сначала было немного непривVычно🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 после телеги, но быстро Vтянулся🇷🇺🤫💪. Интерфейс удобный✅✅✅, Vсё❤️🇷🇺 работает чётко, а главное — SVOя, отечестVенная платформа❤️❤️❤️❤️✅✅✅🙏🙏🙏🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺. Приятно осоZнаVать✅🇺🇸✅🇺🇸✅🇺🇸✅🇺🇸✅🇺🇸, что можно не ZаVисеть от иностранных серVисоV.🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 СоVетую попробоVать!❤️🙏✅🙏🇷🇺❤️🇷🇺❤️✅⚡⚡⚡⚡

🤣131custom 524467345808373440738🤡17custom 5456536850401343919116👎6💊4

24 Mar 2026, 09:59 UTC≈4,180 views86 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

один в один «Схватка» Майкла Манна, только с другими актерами и чуть более слабой драматургией. но крепкая и уверенная категория «под пивас». рак на нынешнем безрыбье.

51🔥19👌9😁4🌭2🌚1

20 Mar 2026, 14:12 UTC≈4,360 views177 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Чак Норрис (1940-2026) F

😢93🫡53💔13🕊7😭43custom 54565368504013439193🌭1

16 Mar 2026, 05:37 UTC≈4,830 views113 reactions21 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

АХАХАХХАХАХАХАХАХА Я ХУЕЮ думаю, может, просто негром стать и быть счастливым? ладно-ладно, я ж не расист какой-нибудь. остальные победители тут.

🤣77custom 524467345808373440718custom 5456536850401343919113🤡3😁1

8 Mar 2026, 09:53 UTC≈4,650 views122 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

должен вам признаться: я сходил в кино на МЮЗИКЛ. а ведь я, как вы знаете, их терпеть не могу. все дело в том, что моя мадам – большая поклонница «Короля и Шута». у меня не было выхода... а недели две назад мы посмотрели сериал «Ландыши», КОТОРЫЙ ТОЖЕ МЮЗИКЛ. и если быть честным, мне даже немножко понравилось. то ли еще будет, ребят. то ли еще будет... словом, чего не сделаешь ради вас, женщин. с праздником, дороги

💅83🤣18custom 5456536850401343919138

5 Mar 2026, 09:44 UTC≈4,060 views95 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ABSOLUTE CINEMA

🔥57custom 545653685040134391921💯5🤡5custom 52446734580837344074custom 52921538533895815202🥱1

2 Mar 2026, 10:29 UTC≈4,490 views119 reactions13 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

собственно, не удивительно, что человек, до сих пор вставляющий в свои ролики доисторические мемы по типу «ДВЕРЬ МНЕ ЗАПИЛИ БЛЯ» и цепляющийся к заклепкам на подводной лодке в художественном произведении, не в состоянии принять нечто новое и понять, что абсурд, творящийся на изолированном на протяжении 28 лет острове, АБСОЛЮТНО БЛЯТЬ УМЕСТЕН. блииин, Алекс Гарленд и Дэнни Бойл захотели сделать что-то большее, чем пр

custom 524467345808373440750🤣28💯14🤡11custom 5456536850401343919654👎1

24 Feb 2026, 06:17 UTC≈4,340 views160 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

4 года

😢111🙏24custom 545653685040134391916❤‍🔥2🕊2😁211

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nadosmotr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,393,258 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“надо будет посмотреть” (@nadosmotr), 6,032 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadosmotr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.