Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МУВИ

Channel

МУВИ

@muviiik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22,731subscribers

+1,459 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002066816911
TypeChannel
Username@muviiik
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/muviiik

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

21,27223,36922,320.57 August 2026 — 21,272 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,272 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,519 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,918 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,133 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,286 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,329 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,446 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,577 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,691 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,851 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,976 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,062 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,068 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,082 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,138 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,179 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,108 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,088 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,147 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,089 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,079 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,036 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,020 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,009 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,859 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,849 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,859 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,840 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,839 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,927 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,924 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,014 subscribers19 September 2026 — 23,064 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,369 subscribers4 October 2026 — 23,362 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,021 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,951 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,939 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,943 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,993 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,999 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,924 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,820 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,798 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,863 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,853 subscribers24 October 2026 — 22,846 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,778 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,754 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,731 subscribers22,7317 August 202626 October 2026
51 measurements spanning 80 days, net +1,459. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,957–23,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 20:5422,731-23
26 Oct 2026, 00:1922,754-24
25 Oct 2026, 03:0922,778-68
24 Oct 2026, 01:5722,846-7
23 Oct 2026, 03:3422,853-10
22 Oct 2026, 02:2622,863+65
20 Oct 2026, 22:1422,798-22
19 Oct 2026, 18:4022,820-104
18 Oct 2026, 17:2722,924-75
17 Oct 2026, 15:1622,999+6
16 Oct 2026, 18:3122,993+50
15 Oct 2026, 15:2922,943+4
14 Oct 2026, 12:3922,939-12
13 Oct 2026, 02:4622,951-70
8 Oct 2026, 21:5423,021-341
4 Oct 2026, 09:0023,362-7
25 Sept 2026, 20:3523,369+305
19 Sept 2026, 02:1923,064+50
16 Sept 2026, 15:3723,014+90
14 Sept 2026, 18:1922,924first reading

Engagement

106 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.8%
avg views ÷ 22,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,320
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 106 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held106 (28 July 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total132,620
Reactions total3,864
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Oct 2026, 08:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

28,640 reactions across 106 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14,81751.7%
💘2,6199.14%
❤‍🔥2,3318.14%
😭1,9866.93%
🤣1,2834.48%
🔥1,1464.00%
💔9353.26%
😍8983.14%
💋6662.33%
💯4811.68%
👍3411.19%
🤩2220.775%
🙏1720.601%
🦄1610.562%
💅1500.524%
😇1250.436%
🍾1230.429%
😈1170.409%
🎄410.143%
🏆260.091%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
44
of 106 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @muviiik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 106 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,620 views82 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤58💘9😍6❤‍🔥3💅3🔥3

23 Oct 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,620 views57 reactionsread 24 October 2026

было вкусно а теперь КАТАТЬСЯЯЯЯ

❤45🔥9💘3

23 Oct 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,890 views110 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤71❤‍🔥19💘10😍5💯3💋2

22 Oct 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,630 views105 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

Когда-то я думал, что для хорошей жизни нужно годами строить карьеру и работать с 9 до 18. Но оказалось, что есть и другой путь 🤑✨ Сейчас я могу работать из любой точки мира, сама влиять на свой доход и не откладывать жизнь на потом, и я очень рад, что открыл для себя онлайн-работу 🤩 И самое интересное, что для заработка в онлайне необязательно вести блог, набирать подписчиков или становиться публичным человеком. Мо…

❤72💘17🔥8💋4❤‍🔥2👍2

22 Oct 2026, 12:07 UTC≈3,270 views93 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💘54❤‍🔥20❤16🔥3

20 Oct 2026, 06:36 UTC≈2,350 views62 reactionsread 21 October 2026
Forwarded from @beautybelkinaPhoto

😱 Кажется, мне подарили пол- ИЛЬ ДЕ БОТЭ ИЛЬ ДЕ БОТЭ в этом году исполняется 25 лет, и по такому случаю еще в начале месяца я получила невероятный подарок - целую коллекцией средств. ♥️ Нет, ну вы посмотрите на это роскошество! Я открыла пакет, достала косметичку, потом первую - вторую баночку, потом аромат, потом еще что-то… 🛍 Выбрать фаворитов из такого количества красивых баночек оказалось практически невозможн…

❤45😍7💘5🔥4🦄1

19 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC≈5,060 views350 reactions1 Starread 24 October 2026
Photo

мы рисовали всю ночь вот что у меня получилось оцениваем !

❤230❤‍🔥49💘38👍8🤣8🔥7💯6😍3

18 Oct 2026, 21:50 UTC≈5,760 views213 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤139❤‍🔥32👍20💋8🔥4😍4💘3🙏2

18 Oct 2026, 21:19 UTC≈5,800 views157 reactionsread 24 October 2026

У НАС НОЧЕВКА ЖДИТЕ КОНТЕНТ !

❤114💘22❤‍🔥16🔥3👍2

18 Oct 2026, 21:18 UTC≈5,910 views230 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥94🤣90❤33💋6😭5💘2

18 Oct 2026, 13:09 UTC≈6,150 views112 reactionsread 24 October 2026

Бесплатный впн 🙏 👉ВПН👈 Берите кому надо 🤗

❤89💔8🙏7😇3💘2❤‍🔥1👍1🔥1

12 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTC≈3,160 views74 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Forwarded from @beautybelkinaPhoto

🤩 У кожи есть особенный талант - напоминать о себе именно тогда, когда ты уже решила, что с ней все хорошо) Воспаления у меня бывают редко, зато есть пигментация и я прекрасно понимаю, как хочется, чтобы кожа выглядела ровной не только при удачном освещении в ванной. 🤩С начала лета в моем уходе живет сыворотка STOP ACNE от MIXIT - уже третий флакон) Я рассказывала о ней раньше, но за это время она не отправилась в …

❤52❤‍🔥7😍7💘5🦄2💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @muviiik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTCAnonymous Poll2,200 voters approx.

ИЩЕМ ВАМ ПАРУ ???

  1. ДААА84%
  2. НЕЕЕТ19%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 23 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МУВИ” (@muviiik), 22,731 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muviiik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.