Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ن

Channel

ن

@mutadayyina

On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,817subscribers

+146 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002414480912
TypeChannel
Username@mutadayyina
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mutadayyina

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

3,210 average views per post against 3,817 subscribers — an engagement rate of 84.0%. Across the 763 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,175–9,982 subscribers, posting mainly in Turkish — the middle half sit between 5.61% and 21.0%, with a median of 11.7%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 August 2026 5 September 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (3 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled60,923
Mature posts only96.5% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers3,817 measured 2 September 2026
Cohortb3162:tur · 763 channels · p10 2.47% · p25 5.61% · p50 11.7% · p75 21.0% · p90 35.4%
Position in cohort99.213th percentile · 7.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.078% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageTurkish · 83.3% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

3,6713,8173,74430 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,757 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,817 subscribers30 August 20262 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net +146. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,649–3,839 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:433,817+60
30 Aug 2026, 15:323,757+86
30 Aug 2026, 09:153,671no change
30 Aug 2026, 09:003,671first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.0%
avg views ÷ 3,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held19 (12 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total60,923
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
64
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 19 we hold a reading for · 89%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mutadayyina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC367 viewsread 30 August 2026

Ko’k yozuvlar ustiga bosib, o’zingizga yoqqan kanallarga ulanib oling, xo’p💝

30 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC676 viewsread 30 August 2026

Kanalimiz kuzatuvchilari uchun eng sara kanallar to’plamini jamladik, ulanib oling, xo’p) 🩰 Liboslarga ikkinchi hayot 🌟 Sen va men jannatda 🫂 O’qi gulim, o’qi 🤩 Ayolning koʻngli qolsa 🌷 Mahzunlikka chora 💌 Von dem buch | kitobdan 💙 Burchak qizi 🧕 Muhammadning onasi ❣️ Qanday sevilishni xohlaysan ❤️ Siz tanlangansiz 📖 Qur’on nur baxsh etadi

29 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC960 views0 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

Toʻgʻrisini aytganda, men zikrni ko‘p narsaning kaliti deb o‘ylayman. o‘ylab qarasak, Alloh hayotimizning deyarli har bir holatida U zotni eslash yo‘lini bizga ko‘rsatgan. xato qilsak, istig‘for aytamiz. biror ne’matga erishsak, “Alhamdulillah” deymiz. qiynalsak, yo‘l topolmay qolsak, Allohni eslaymiz. go‘yo zikr shunchaki kun davomida vaqti vaqti bilan aytib qo‘yiladigan so‘zlar emas, balki hayotga qanday munosabatd

28 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈1,660 views0 reactions9 Starsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Allohim, menga hamma havas qiladigan insonni emas, Sen rozi bo‘ladigan insonni nasib qil, iymoni samimiy, xulqi muloyim bo‘lgan va muhabbati ikkimizni ham Senga qaytishga yetaklaydigan insonni menga ber. 📍mutadayyina

27 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,790 views0 reactions16 Starsread 30 August 2026

U shunchaki tinchgina, o‘z dinini unutmagan holda chiroyli yashashni istaydigan bir qiz. uning uchun eng muhimi Alloh bilan bo‘lgan munosabati. odamlar uni qanday ko‘rishi yoki nima deb o‘ylashi emas, yolg‘iz qolganida qalbi qanday ekanligi muhim. u namozini shunchaki bajarib qo‘yiladigan vazifa emas, qaytib boradigan joyi deb bilishni xohlaydi. qalbi charchaganda ham, hech kimga ayta olmagan gaplarini Allohga aytib,

26 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈2,640 views0 reactions5 Starsread 30 August 2026

be a good one, focus on deen, hit the gym, be an honest person, have standards, smaller circle, have respect, have haya, educate yourself, take care of yourself, eat well, protect your peace, guard your salah, trust Allah, have pure intentions, let Allah swt handle the rest, become better, think positive, thank Allah. 📍mutadayyina

25 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC≈2,950 views0 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

Alloh sizning qalbingiz eng qattiq bog‘langan narsangiz bilan ham sinashi mumkin va buning hikmati bor. Chunki ba’zan nasihat insonni o‘zgartira olmaydi, kitoblar ham, motivatsion videolar ham bizni ich-ichimizdan o‘zgartirmasligi mumkin. Ammo ayriliq, yo‘qotish yoki hayotdagi og‘ir sinovlar insonni o‘ziga qayta qarashga majbur qiladi. Alloh ba’zan qiyinchiliklarni bizni sindirish uchun emas, bu dunyo doim bir xil da

23 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈3,280 views0 reactions3 Starsread 30 August 2026
Voice message

bizga hamma narsa allaqachon taqdir qilingan. qayerdan bilasan? balki sening ajaling ertagadir. balki men shu yerdan chiqaman-u, birozdan keyin vafot etarman. ammo men hali tavba qilishga ulgurmadim, hali namoz o‘qishga ulgurmadim. qayerdan bilasan? atrofimizda qanchadan-qancha voqealarni ko‘ryapmiz: odamlar avariyaga uchraydi, yoqilg‘i shoxobchalarida portlashlar bo‘ladi, kimdir giyohvand moddalardan vafot etadi. se

22 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈2,980 views0 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

Ba’zan biz mehribonlikni faqat yaxshi gapirish, birovga yordam berish yoki chiroyli muomala qilish deb o‘ylaymiz. Aslida esa mehribonlik boshqa insonning qalbini ehtiyot qilishni ham bilishdir. Kimningdir kiyimi sizga yoqmasligi mumkin, lekin bu haqda aytishingiz shart emas. Kimdir hayotida siz tanlamagan qarorni qilishi mumkin, lekin har bir qarorga o‘z fikringizni qo‘shishingiz shart emas. Kimningdir yashash tarzi,

21 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC≈3,220 views0 reactions2 Starsread 30 August 2026
Voice message

ba’zi insonlar shu qadar kambag‘alki, ularning qo‘lida bor yagona narsa boylikdir. ular to‘shak sotib olishlari mumkin, ammo uyquni sotib ololmaydilar. uy sotib olishlari mumkin, ammo unda iliq xonadonni his qila olmaydilar. e’tibor sotib olishlari mumkin, ammo muhabbatni sotib ololmaydilar. ular pul sotib olishi mumkin bo‘lgan hamma narsaga ega, ammo qalbni boylik hissi bilan to‘ldiradigan narsaga ega emaslar. chunk

20 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈3,510 views0 reactions1 Starread 30 August 2026

In islam, if you want a clearer sign, pray istikhara. If you really want it, Pray tahajjud. 📍mutadayyina

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mutadayyina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ن” (@mutadayyina), 3,817 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutadayyina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.