Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maximilian Clarke

Channel

Maximilian Clarke

@mticlarke

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,509subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710460978
TypeChannel
Username@mticlarke
Created5 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mticlarke

Growth

2,5092,5162,512.57 August 2026 — 2,516 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,516 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,513 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,510 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,509 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,508–2,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:482,509-1
14 Aug 2026, 21:162,510-3
11 Aug 2026, 05:242,513-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:532,516no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:162,516first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 March 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,737 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢1,73936.7%
1,53532.4%
👍1,12523.7%
🤬1463.08%
😱751.58%
👏470.992%
🔥270.57%
💩190.401%
😁140.296%
🥰40.084%
🤔30.063%
👎20.042%
🙏10.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,737reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2022 to 6 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2023, 09:01 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

27 Sept 2023, 01:19 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

17 Apr 2022, 00:24 UTC≈63,700 views244 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Mariupol front with Chechen https://youtu.be/bMBqQf53ER8 Akhmat Sila

155👍75😢8😱6

16 Apr 2022, 19:17 UTC≈78,400 views620 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A member of the Russian military escorts a girl and her family, who had been living in a bombshelter for over a month in eastern Mariupol, towards safer and quieter neighbourhood

508👍64👏33😢8💩6😁1

15 Apr 2022, 19:31 UTC≈64,800 views245 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ilicha iron and steel works: one of the final pockets of Ukrainian resistance in #Mariupol. Video from an #Azov vehicle base with uniforms etc, from my #youtube https://youtu.be/hw5gSzMjIwo

👍222🔥19😱3😁1

15 Apr 2022, 19:22 UTC≈24,100 views231 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍2219💩1

11 Apr 2022, 07:45 UTC≈73,500 views439 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A mother and daughter embrace after their house was destroyed by Ukrainian shelling in the #Donetsk village of Olenivka

👍197😢16267🤬8💩4😁1

5 Apr 2022, 21:09 UTC≈81,600 views256 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#Donetsk - Petrovsky district. Civilians in the frontline still under Ukrainian shelling after 8 years https://youtu.be/6rFuLN_MzL4

😢193🤬37👍25💩1

2 Apr 2022, 10:56 UTC≈46,100 views757 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

War is hell. None of us can handle it. @patricklancaster . We are taking a day off but the death will never leave us.

😢546175👍28🥰4💩3👏1

1 Apr 2022, 16:02 UTC≈53,300 views123 reactionsread 7 August 2026

A week in and around central # Mariupol https://youtu.be/4OIaoOzyCNI

😢83👍40

1 Apr 2022, 14:44 UTC≈18,300 views353 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I don’t support the exploitation of animals. But when the manager of the #Mariupol zoo hands you a tiger cub, it’s impossible to say no

295👍45😁8🔥5

30 Mar 2022, 15:07 UTC≈62,600 views179 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Neighbours exchange an emotional goodbye as one prepares to leave to family in #Donetsk, while the rest remain in their bomb shelters beneath their destroyed homes in #Mariupol

100😢67👍12

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mticlarke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,199,422 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maximilian Clarke” (@mticlarke), 2,509 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mticlarke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.