Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sidenkov textile

Channel

sidenkov textile

@msidenkov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,761subscribers

+225 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765748868
TypeChannel
Username@msidenkov
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/msidenkov

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5364,7614,648.57 August 2026 — 4,536 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,540 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,541 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,544 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,570 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,592 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,599 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,644 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,674 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,740 subscribers8 September 2026 — 4,743 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,746 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,761 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,502–4,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 06:154,761+15
12 Sept 2026, 07:364,746+3
8 Sept 2026, 05:574,743+3
2 Sept 2026, 19:464,740+66
30 Aug 2026, 10:074,674+30
27 Aug 2026, 10:464,644+45
24 Aug 2026, 10:354,599+7
20 Aug 2026, 23:154,592+22
17 Aug 2026, 17:554,570+26
14 Aug 2026, 13:264,544+3
11 Aug 2026, 06:524,541+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:104,540+4
7 Aug 2026, 05:034,536first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥6771.3%
custom 53891053312782080821212.8%
custom 53889720799178474221010.6%
💔55.32%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:21 UTC418 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥7custom 53891053312782080822

9 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC441 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

рейв по золотому кольцу Чжэцзян — Цзянсу: 嘉兴濮院 — 无锡 — 常州 — 杭州 Самая высокая плотность коммуникации, которая у меня когда-либо была в Китае’ • Были на фабрике фабриках по производству пряжи в провинции Цзянсу • Были на встрече с одними из лидеров категории домашней одежды (тоже в Цзянсу) • Ездили на встречу с фабрикой-микрокорпорацией, которая производит одежду для COS и других международных брендов, а параллельно

❤‍🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC677 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Отец пряжи из Цзянсу» Сегодня мы были на фабрике по производству пряжи в провинции Цзянсу, город Чанчжоу (常州), район Уцзинь (武进区). Босс, просто мировой мужик, сын которого только закончил учиться в Стэнфорде, поэтому mindset у него очень нетипичный для фабриканта’ Годовой объем 6 000 тонн в год, около 200 сотрудников, занимается этим бизнесом уже 22 года. Работает с H&M, Zara, Uniqlo, GAP, китайскими брендами: 海

❤‍🔥20💔5custom 53889720799178474222custom 53891053312782080821

5 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC534 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Так получилось, что в последнее время я, мягко говоря, очень глубоко интегрировался в китайскую бизнес-среду. Наверное, примерно так, как когда-то и хотел. И мне очень интересно наблюдать за тем, как здесь люди думают, как двигаются, насколько быстро принимают решения. У китайцев совершенно особенное отношение к деньгам и бизнесу. Особенно у южан. И особенно у тех, кто родом из Чаошаня — 潮汕. Мне сложно это до конц

❤‍🔥16custom 53891053312782080824custom 53889720799178474223

4 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC511 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥8custom 53889720799178474223custom 53891053312782080822

4 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC554 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Рейв по обувным мануфактурам» Самая недооценённая часть рынка, куда идёт минимум брендов — это обувь! хотя объем рынка сумасшедший’ Колодки, комплектующие, примерки, материалы, постоянные доработки — короче, как говорят китайцы: (麻烦 máfan — хлопоты) Но именно там сидит очень жирная маржа’ На фото — часть того, что сейчас есть на производствах, которые потихоньку начинают баловаться: (开发 kāifā — теми самыми разра

❤‍🔥11custom 53891053312782080823custom 53889720799178474222

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @msidenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sidenkov textile” (@msidenkov), 4,761 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msidenkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.