Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mr.YTR

Channel

Mr.YTR

@mrytr123

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,255subscribers

-241 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002058960778
TypeChannel
Username@mrytr123
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrytr123

Growth

18,25518,49618,375.516 August 2026 — 18,496 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,481 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,463 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,445 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,423 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,405 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,375 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,350 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,328 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,325 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,318 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,295 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,281 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,255 subscribers16 August 202631 August 2026
14 measurements spanning 14 days, net -241. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,219–18,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 02:2518,255-26
29 Aug 2026, 22:5518,281-14
28 Aug 2026, 20:1818,295-23
27 Aug 2026, 22:3418,318-7
27 Aug 2026, 00:2318,325-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:4218,328-22
25 Aug 2026, 01:3518,350-25
23 Aug 2026, 15:0618,375-30
21 Aug 2026, 21:5818,405-18
20 Aug 2026, 15:4218,423-22
19 Aug 2026, 13:5518,445-18
18 Aug 2026, 17:2418,463-18
17 Aug 2026, 20:1418,481-15
16 Aug 2026, 19:3118,496first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 18,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.591%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held11 (27 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,740
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6085.7%
👎68.57%
👍45.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈2,270 views23 reactionsread 31 August 2026

👆New Capcut Pro 2026 use Without VPN Is Capcut Pro main von ke jarurat nahi hoti hai kyunki is Capcut mein no internet connection wali problem nahi aati hai ismein sabhi effects or template bhi sahi se work karte hain

13👎6👍4

30 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC≈5,040 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026

150+ Viral Background Music Pack 🔥 👇 https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ejpm7C4u1phKm1aYPU4JifqAF8j1pd9j

8

7 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTC≈5,020 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Poll

Video Editing ke liye aap kaun sa software use karte ho, jaldi btao main aapko unke editing assets dunga

  1. Premiere pro28%
  2. Capcut70%
  3. Vn Video Editor11%
  4. Others8%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3

16 May 2026, 11:51 UTC≈7,010 views7 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Chatgpt Photo Editing Prompt :- 👇 Edit this photo in a trendy Instagram influencer style with premium bright color grading, smooth clean skin retouching, soft glow, and vibrant natural colors. Keep the face realistic while removing blemishes, acne, dark circles, and harsh shadows professionally. Enhance eyes, hair details, and slightly whiten teeth. Add soft luxury lighting, warm tones, balanced highlights, smooth c

7

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mrytr123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jun 2026, 13:15 UTCAnonymous Poll413 voters

Video Editing ke liye aap kaun sa software use karte ho, jaldi btao main aapko unke editing assets dunga

  1. Premiere pro28%
  2. Capcut70%
  3. Vn Video Editor11%
  4. Others8%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jayanta Bhai
@jayantabhai06 · 102,528
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 16 August 2026
Rajan editz
@Rajaneditzofficial · 79,961
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mr.YTR” (@mrytr123), 18,255 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrytr123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.