Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mr. Satoshik

Channel

Mr. Satoshik

@mrsatoshiken

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,193subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002046133830
TypeChannel
Username@mrsatoshiken
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrsatoshiken

Growth

1,1931,1981,195.56 August 2026 — 1,198 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,198 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,196 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,194 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,193 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,192–1,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:341,193-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:141,194-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:011,196-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:481,198no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:481,198first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.4%
avg views ÷ 1,193 subscribers
Avg views / post
410
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total6,970
Reactions total237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈191 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Opensea was found in the codes in wallet.ton.org. According to rumors: > stickers and gifts will be available on Opensea after stickers are integrated. x / chat / allton.store

1 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC≈345 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

$GRAM wallet integration started: > Telegram Beta for iOS v12.9.3 (34530) begins integrating a built-in TON (Gram) wallet into the app. > Unlike the current Wallet, which operates as a Mini App, the upcoming TON (Gram) wallet will be integrated directly into the Telegram client. It is possible that very soon, every user will see the $TONY character in their wallet :) x / chat / allton.store

31 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC≈237 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

What will happen sooner — Odysseus returns to Ithaca or a memecoin season starts on TON? x / chat / allton.store

30 Jul 2026, 20:18 UTC≈267 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

❤️ Keep only the sticker narrative; everything else is just gambling. x / chat / allton.store

30 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC≈732 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Crash — first-ever repost with the $UTYA ticker mentioned? x / chat / allton.store

29 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC≈652 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

If you believe in memecoin season on TON, now is the perfect time to buy the dip on your favorite memecoins while everyone else is distracted by gambling. x / chat / allton.store

27 Jul 2026, 19:18 UTC≈405 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Perhaps some of the items on this list will be expensive: > memecoins dedicated to Egor Zhgun's stickers will always be relevant, especially $UTYA and $YODA, which will cause huge FOMO among users; > therefore, I expect that users, driven by FOMO, will start searching for and buying other meme coins dedicated to Egor's works. The only problem is that these tokens lack a CTO lead: > if one emerges and is hardworki

26 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC≈512 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Hmmm... Sasha, are stickers a pump-and-dump too, or just a dump? I'm down 68% on my sticker position. x / chat / allton.store

26 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC≈395 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

I have to write this post to explain why I believe $TONY is one of the strongest narratives to emerge recently: > TONY is one of the best stories centered around stickers and the mascot of the TON ecosystem; > Telegram has its own mascot UTYA, while TON has TONY — these are parallel narratives, not competing ones; > TON team gifted us this sticker pack back in 2022, anticipating the rise of memes. They gave this d

25 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈353 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

$55k —> $700k done $TONY — represents one of the best narratives centered around stickers and TON ecosystem's mascot: > even the original TONY artist returned to create new stickers, which were included in the official sticker pack. TONY character might be added to the Gram Wallet announced by Pavel Durov. x / chat / allton.store

23 Jul 2026, 08:19 UTC≈530 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Interesting facts about $道德經: > when we were in the $700K–$1M market cap range, we easily got in touch with guys from OKX Wallet and Bitget Wallet in the Chinese region. They stayed in touch with us and helped us resolve some issues; > we also got an instant listing #道德經 on CoinGecko, even though we didn't submit an application ourselves. Someone from the community probably did it on their own initiative, paying fo

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mrsatoshiken. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 192,068 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mr. Satoshik” (@mrsatoshiken), 1,193 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrsatoshiken.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.