Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аскер Тумов | Кавказ

Channel

Аскер Тумов | Кавказ

@mr_tumov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,853subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002103047937
TypeChannel
Username@mr_tumov
Created10 May 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mr_tumov

Growth

2,8532,8572,8556 August 2026 — 2,856 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,856 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,857 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,856 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,853 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,852–2,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:522,853-3
12 Aug 2026, 13:042,856-1
9 Aug 2026, 07:162,857+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:052,856no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:512,856first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.8%
avg views ÷ 2,853 subscribers
Avg views / post
936
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total9,359
Reactions total303
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

591 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍14123.9%
🤣14123.9%
🔥9315.7%
8814.9%
💯498.29%
🗿244.06%
🐳213.55%
😱183.05%
🤬91.52%
👏71.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 591reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mr_tumov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC696 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Опрос удался, многие поделились комментариями. У нас уже были нарты, галлы, гуроны и абу-бандиты. Колы (от "колхозники"). Мамбеты (у казахов). Чилийцы (от "чылэ" - на адыгском "село"). Джохары (в КЧР). Индейцы и орки (Средиземье). Корсаки (в Астрахани). Поступил очень важный комментарий от надежного источника из Абхазии - в разных местах говорят "казик", "казбич", "казман", "казманбей". Говорит, это эвфемизм от сове

🤣12🔥4🐳31👏1

3 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC586 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Парижский актер Этьен Мелинг, который в 1850-е играл в театре роль имама Шамиля. Во Франции о Шамиле знали, подробности его борьбы против России с удовольствием смаковали в светской прессе. Даже в театре постановки с его участием смотрели. С очень важной оговоркой - в его существовании никто не был уверен. Потому что у французов перед глазами был Абд аль-Кадир - лидер алжирского сопротивления, который долго боролся

🤣105🔥4👍2🗿1

30 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC938 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересно, что в 2000-е у термина "нартики" появился конкурент. Отныне этих людей стали называть "галлы". Кто это ввел в оборот, мне неизвестно. Почему народ Астерикса и Обеликса так публично унизили, тоже не знаю. Но в каком-то смысле произошла частичная реабилитация нартов. Сейчас термины "галлы" и "нартики" мирно сосуществуют. Кстати, в Чечне мне рассказывали про аналогичный термин, обозначающий группы интеллекту

🤣175👍5🗿4👏3🐳1💯1

29 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC959 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сильные нартики создают хорошие времена. Хорошие времена создают слабых манкуртов. Слабые манкурты создают плохие времена. Плохие времена создают сильных нартиков.

🤣32💯5🔥3🐳1

29 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC937 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Процесс сжимания малых языков на Кавказе начался не вчера и не одновременно. Вот пример кабардинского - как я понимаю, дело пошло в 1960-е, когда модернизация и индустриализация вмешались в привычный аграрный уклад. Именно тогда Нальчик перестал быть "русским" городом, сюда хлынул поток сельской молодежи, которой открыли доступ к образованию, карьере и культурной жизни. Условий получения этого доступа было несколько,

🔥136👍6

29 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC796 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Для одной статьи о малых языках последнее время пришлось полазить в дебрях социолингвистики и пропустить через себя много интересных и не очень исследований о языковых сдвигах. По всему миру малые языки вытесняются и как-то трансформируются в целях выживания. Тибетский, корсиканский, шотландский, ирландский и несть им числа. Другой вопрос, что перспективы этого выживания не очень радужные, ниже поделюсь. Первое инте

👍8🔥8💯52👏1

28 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC782 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скрин с одной из моих последних лекций на Машуке по интернет-фейкам. Что произошло: пару недель назад в Нальчике существо мужского пола зашло в супермаркет в никабе и унесло банку с деньгами, которые собирали больному ребенку. Банка стояла под камерой; мама ребенка запостила видео, которое разошлось буквально везде. Насколько я знаю, вора еще не нашли, его личность неизвестна. Теперь мое описание новости сравните с

31💯18🐳4👍2🤣2

25 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,270 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

7. В чем достоинство этого канона? Помимо объективности, он ориентирован на нас сейчас и на нас в будущем. Только в таком виде канон может спасти нас от разделения, этнических стереотипов, взаимной вражды, исторических споров, дележки земли и много другого. Раз уж мы обручены жить вместе, пусть история служит консолидирующим фактором. Близость кабардинцев и балкарцев к жителям Северо-Западного Кавказа не должна забыв

👍25💯8🔥5

25 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,420 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

0. В Нальчике строят 34-метровую башню, символизирующую 200-летие добровольного вхождения Балкарии в состав России. Новость ожидаемо вызвала яркую (и полярную) реакцию в соцсетях. Кабардино-Балкария (как и Карачаево-Черкесия) уже не раз попадала в ситуацию, где бытовые стереотипы, исторические споры и драка за ресурсы сливаются в фактор противостояния и взаимных обвинений. Это контекст. Дальше очень прошу следить за

🔥163

24 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC975 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, меня с этого порвало, но. Я в этом вопросе идеалист и считаю, что в любом вузе можно хотя бы попытаться учиться. А эти две позиции - с одной стороны жалобы, с другой поиск обходных путей - разговоры в пользу бедных. За исключением редких случаев реальной несправедливости.

🤣164

15 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC≈1,500 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У жителей Краснодарского края довольно пестрая картина самоопределения. Понятно, там россияне, христиане, мусульмане и т.д. Но если брать именно этно-локальный контекст, то можно выделить несколько групп. Во-первых, это казаки, те самые кубаноиды. Во-вторых, это городские космополиты, в основном живут в Краснодаре, Сочи, Новороссийске. В-третьих, это проживающие здесь кавказские этносы - шапсуги, армяне. В-четвертых,

👍9😱5🤣3🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC≈1,500 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На днях выступал Фальков (Минобрнауки), выдал базу. «Массовая технология проверки знаний, как у нас контрольно-измерительные материалы, — это написание дипломных или курсовых работ. То, что было 20–30 лет назад и работало вполне себе хорошо, сегодня по целому ряду направлений изменилось... Дипломные работы уже не выполняют той функции, которую они выполняли в высшем образовании еще 10–15–20 лет назад». После этого в

👍20🔥11💯73👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mr_tumov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 152,967 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аскер Тумов | Кавказ” (@mr_tumov), 2,853 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr_tumov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.