Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 夢如家の正妹評價

Channel

夢如家の正妹評價

@mr4641

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,218subscribers

+67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003730983210
TypeChannel
Username@mr4641
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 29 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mr4641

Growth

1,1511,2181,184.57 August 2026 — 1,151 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,154 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,175 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,179 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,197 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,201 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,218 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 17 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,141–1,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 13:571,218+17
20 Aug 2026, 20:021,201+4
17 Aug 2026, 23:431,197+18
14 Aug 2026, 16:251,179+4
10 Aug 2026, 23:411,175+21
7 Aug 2026, 16:091,154+3
7 Aug 2026, 05:321,151first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 1,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
136
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held8 (29 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,087
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#北部客評碎片分享 幼齒學生妹小榛 ① ② ③ 名字:小榛 年齡:19 身高:160 體重:42kg 胸圍:C左右 顏值:10 類型:清純可愛 有/無刺青:無 服務態度打分:10 互動過程真實感想:妹妹很可愛 皮膚白、笑起來有點害羞,穿得很簡單就T恤配短裙 ,一開始還怕她年輕會生澀,結果完全不會,該主動的時候很主動,該配合的時候也很配合。幫吹的時候完全沒有那種敷衍的感覺,眼神還會看著你,那個畫面真的很暈,挑逗完 用手摸妹妹下面發現超級濕 很緊 抽插超爽的。姿勢的部分也幾乎都可以配合,我換了好幾個姿勢她都ok,也沒催時間,整個過程大概快一個小時,不會趕時間,做完還躺在我旁邊聊天撒嬌 ,女友fu滿滿 是否想要回約:會 對夢如評價:相信夢如真的會性福滿滿😃 ⭐Gleezy:mr520t 🌐賴@mr502t @mr520t 🌐 電報@mr520t @mr502t 🌐Telegram喝茶總頻道 ⭐點擊加入Gleezy本人照

4 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC101 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#北部客評碎片分享 高挑精緻美麻豆小羽客評來啦~ 點擊查看小羽客評 ① ② ③ 名字:小羽 年齡:目測21左右 身高:170 體重:47 胸圍:B+ 顏值:很正 類型:漂亮麻豆 服務態度打分:100 互動過程真實感想:老實說一開始還有點怕照片跟本人有落差,畢竟踩過太多次雷了😂 結果見到本人直接放心,真的跟照片一模一樣,甚至本人更好看。 妹妹蠻高的,腿超級長又很直,站在一起直接到我肩膀以上…皮膚很白很嫩,不是那種粉底蓋出來的白,是真的白裡透紅那種。臉小小的,五官很精緻,笑起來很甜。 進房間之後先聊天了一下,後來洗澡也很仔細,到上床之後真的不得不說服務超級好😏 不是那種死魚型的,很會配合,姿勢幾乎都可以配合我,我想要的都有做到,而且不會臭臉也不會催,過程中還會主動親我、抱我,真的很有女友感。 整體來說,顏值高、身材好、服務又在線,這種真的很難遇到。 想約的可以直接問夢如,cp值超高,不會後悔😂 是否想要回約:一

4 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC103 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#高雄客評碎片分享 名字:小靜 年齡:26 身高:155 體重:50 胸圍:大D小E(奶很挺型很美) 顏值:8 類型:暗藏胸器的鄰家妹妹 服務態度打分:9.5 互動過程真實感想:一開始跟妹妹先洗澡,妹妹幫洗的很仔細,從脖子到腳,很少遇到這麼仔細的了。到了床上,妹妹從奶頭開始挑逗,舔到肚子再到大腿內側再到小弟,不得不說這前奏很有感覺就是不一樣,遇到很多都直接三點處理,看著那對漂亮的胸配上靈巧的舌頭,小弟只能昂首期盼進入溫暖的地方了。套上之後,妹妹直接騎了上來,穴真的有緊,搖起來又很有力,很想問怎麼練的,給點面子啊。接著輪到正常味,緊穴搭配抽插擺動的漂亮大奶,真的是視覺觸覺都滿了,只能不爭氣的衝刺射出啊。第一次完簡單沖一下,妹妹竟然還問要不要幫洗,真的服務態度好到不行。雙方躺在床上聊天然後手也忙起來,摸著摸著光滑的皮膚跟超讚的胸,小弟告訴我它又可以了,妹妹又是在上面來搖,在變型整個趴在上面搖起來。越夾越緊,只能讓小弟趕快換個背

31 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC153 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

第一次配合直接回約名單 寶說好想蜜蜜 以後只約她了🤣

31 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC194 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

都向這位寶貝學習 沒有及時回復直接打電話喲~ 🙏🙏🙏 兮兮預約走起~

29 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

超級阿莎力的寶 剛開始還擔心不滿意打槍 見到妹妹直接ok啦~

29 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC38 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

超級阿莎力的寶 回來台灣就找夢如預約啦~ 開房間的效率也是超高的 🤣

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mr4641. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 69,263 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“夢如家の正妹評價” (@mr4641), 1,218 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr4641.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.